Use for the pre-submission preflight to 《会计研究》 (Accounting Research) — checking footnote (当页下注) conventions, the 著者—出版年制 reference style, abstract/keyword limits, article length, the online-only submission system via the Accounting Society of China site, double-blind anonymity, and document hygiene. Use right before submitting; verify every rule against the journal's current 投稿指南.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
体例与字数以官网**最新《投稿指南》**为准。规则会变，投前务必复核，不要凭记忆。
acr-fit-positioning）acr-measurement）acr-institutional-standards）acr-identification）acr-mechanism）acr-implications）《会计研究》由中国会计学会主办，是 CSSCI 唯一权威顶级会计学期刊，初审常因体例与匿名问题直接退回，与稿件质量无关。下表把易错点与退稿模式对齐（具体数值一律以官网最新《投稿指南》为准）：
| 审查点 | 达标线（以最新指南为准） | 常见退稿/退修模式 |
|---|---|---|
| 注释体例 | 当页下注（脚注），每页「①②」单独排序 | 用尾注或文中夹注 [1][2] |
| 参考文献 | 著者—出版年制，文末先中文后外文 | 用顺序编码制 [1][2] |
| 摘要/关键词 | 摘要 200–300 字、关键词 3–8 个 | 摘要过短或关键词超限 |
| 篇幅 | 全文一般不低于 16000 字 | 不足字数下限 |
| 匿名 | 去除作者身份、清文件属性、自引第三人称化 | 正文/文件属性泄露身份 |
| 投稿渠道 | 仅线上（中国会计学会网站系统） | 走邮箱或纸质邮寄 |
虚构稿《关键审计事项披露与分析师预测准确性》准备投稿，自检（示意）：正文 18200 字（≥16000 达标）、中文摘要 248 字（200–300 达标）、关键词 5 个（3–8 达标）、注释为当页下注每页单独排序、参考文献著者—出版年制且中文在前。匿名核查发现一处自引写作"我们之前的研究（作者，2021）"——改为第三人称占位"已有研究（XXX，2021）"；文件属性中作者单位未清，已清除。结论：体例与匿名达标，可投。
上述字数为演示自检流程的示意值，实际限值以最新《投稿指南》为准。
本刊为月刊、三审终审 + 双向匿名，审稿周期约三个月。摘要字数、篇幅上下限、关键词数、是否需结构化摘要等具体规则可能调整，投前务必以编辑部最新《投稿指南》为准，不要凭本文记忆。
【体例】当页下注□ 著者—出版年制□ 中英摘要□ 引文对应□
【字数】正文 X 字（≥16000）/ 摘要 X 字 / 关键词 X 个
【匿名】已清理 / 待清理 <点>
【系统】asc.net.cn 在线投稿（仅线上）已确认入口
【内容复核】落点□ 度量□ 制度□ 识别□ 机制□ 启示□
【结论】可投 / 待修 <清单>
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.