Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

advmat-length-management

Use when an Advanced Materials manuscript must be fit to its article-type format — Communication versus Research Article — where word count and display items are budgeted together against a typeset page limit. Manages the length budget; does not restructure the science or polish prose line by line.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md5.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Advanced Materials Length Management (advmat-length-management)

When to trigger

  • You are unsure whether the work is a Communication or a full Research Article
  • The manuscript overruns the typeset page limit for its article type
  • Figures/schemes are large and you must trade display items against text
  • A reviewer or editor asked you to condense to a Communication, or expand to an Article
  • You are in late polish, after the science and figures are stable

Article type sets the budget

Advanced Materials counts length in typeset published pages, not manuscript pages — a double-spaced 25-page manuscript may typeset to far fewer pages in the two-column layout. Word count and display items (figures, schemes, tables) count together against the page budget. Approximate targets (verify current limits on the author page):

Article typeTypeset budget (approx.)AbstractDisplay items (approx.)
Communication~4 published pages (~3500 words)none — opening paragraph acts as abstract~4 figures/tables
Research Article~10 published pages (~3000–8000 words)short abstract (~200 words) + 3–7 keywords~3–8 display items
Review / Progresslonger, by invitation/agreementstructured per typemany

A large or multi-panel figure consumes a disproportionate slice of the page budget: adding a panel can cost a paragraph of text.

Choosing Communication vs. Article

  • Communication — one sharp, urgent advance that a specialist audience needs now; concise, high-impact, no room for exhaustive characterization in the body (it goes to the SI).
  • Research Article — the same class of advance but requiring the full structure → property → function story, multiple device configurations, or a mechanism study that a Communication cannot hold.
  • If your "Communication" needs eight figures to be believed, it is an Article. If your "Article" has one figure and one claim, it is a Communication.

Trimming order (cut in this sequence)

Trim only after the central advance, characterization, and figures are stable, so you cut padding, not evidence:

  1. Hype and boilerplate — delete "novel/unprecedented/facile/remarkable"; collapse background paragraphs to one sentence (see advmat-writing-style).
  2. Redundant prose — remove sentences that transcribe figure values; interpret instead.
  3. Optimization and secondary data — move process sweeps, extra samples, and control experiments to the SI (see advmat-supplementary).
  4. Display items — merge panels that prove one link; move non-essential figures to the SI; avoid double-column figures unless the data demand it.
  5. Reference pruning — keep the citations that establish novelty and support trust; drop padding.

Never trim: the decisive characterization, the benchmarking, or the headline metric's statistics.

Fit-check routine

  • Typeset a draft in the Wiley template to see real page count, not manuscript pages.
  • Budget each figure by its printed area; tally figures + text together.
  • Leave a margin under the limit so revision additions do not overrun.
  • If still over after trimming padding, the honest fixes are: promote to a Research Article, or move a supporting result wholesale to the SI — not shrinking fonts or figures below legibility.

Checklist

  • Article type chosen deliberately (Communication vs. Research Article) and matches the content
  • Length measured as typeset pages in the Wiley template, not manuscript pages
  • Display items counted together with text against the budget
  • Hype words and background padding removed first
  • Optimization/secondary data moved to the SI, not deleted
  • No double-column figure unless the data require it
  • Abstract/keywords conform to the article type
  • Decisive characterization, benchmarking, and statistics untouched

Anti-patterns

  • Trimming characterization or benchmarking to hit the page limit
  • Counting manuscript pages instead of typeset pages and being surprised at proof
  • Shrinking figures below legibility to save space
  • Forcing a full study into a Communication by hiding the evidence in the SI
  • Padding a thin Communication into an Article with filler characterization
  • Discovering the overrun only at production, after acceptance

Output format

【Article type】Communication / Research Article — matches content?  yes / reconsider
【Typeset page estimate】within budget?  yes / over by ~X
【Display items】counted with text?  N figures + M tables
【Trim done】hype / prose / secondary-data-to-SI / figures / refs
【Untouched】characterization + benchmarking + statistics intact?  yes
【Next】advmat-cover-letter or advmat-submission

Page limits, word counts, abstract/keyword rules, and display-item allowances differ by article type and change — verify all on the official Wiley Advanced Materials author page.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

See all skills by brycewang-stanford

Report a problem with this skill