Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

advmat-submission

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Advanced Materials manuscript — article type, format, files, Supporting Information, TOC graphic, ORCID, and metadata for the Wiley submission system. Verifies submission readiness; does not write content.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (3)

  • SKILL.md6.7 KB
  • templates/checklist.md4.3 KB
  • templates/manuscript_template.md4.8 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Advanced Materials Submission Preflight (advmat-submission)

When to trigger

  • "Submitting tonight" — the last check before the upload button
  • You are unsure which files the Wiley submission system expects
  • You need to confirm the manuscript fits its article-type format
  • You want a single gate before handing off to peer review

Pre-submission checklist

Article type and format

  • Correct article type selected (Communication vs. Research Article) and content matches (see advmat-length-management)
  • Within the typeset page budget for that type (display items counted with text)
  • Prepared in the Wiley Advanced Materials template / accepted format
  • Communication: opening paragraph written to serve as the abstract; Research Article: short abstract (~200 words) + 3–7 keywords
  • SI units, consistent significant figures, all abbreviations and formulae defined

Files

  • Main manuscript (with Experimental Section) + figures
  • All figure files at Wiley's required resolution/format (vector for line art; high-DPI raster for micrographs)
  • Supporting Information as a separate file, clearly labeled (see advmat-supplementary)
  • Table-of-Contents (TOC) graphic + blurb prepared to spec
  • Cover letter (see advmat-cover-letter)
  • Bibliography in current Wiley Advanced Materials reference style

Metadata and identifiers

  • Title, abstract, author list entered consistently with the manuscript
  • ORCID provided for authors as required (corresponding author at minimum)
  • Affiliations and corresponding-author contact correct
  • Funding recorded per Wiley instructions
  • Data-availability statement and any required declarations present

Authors and integrity

  • All authors meet authorship criteria and approved submission
  • Author contributions (CRediT) recorded if required
  • Originality / not-under-consideration-elsewhere confirmed
  • Prior preprint (ChemRxiv / arXiv) disclosed
  • Competing-interest statement provided
  • Ethics / biosafety statements included if biomaterials or animal/human-derived samples are involved

Referees

  • Suggested referees entered (see advmat-referee-strategy)
  • Opposed referees entered with a brief, professional rationale

Self-consistency

  • Every "see Supporting Information" / "Figure Sx" pointer resolves
  • Figure/scheme/table numbering continuous and matching in-text callouts
  • SI items use the S-prefix and are each cited from the main text
  • The main text stands alone without the SI (cross-check advmat-supplementary)

Submission-system notes

  • Submit through Wiley's online submission system for Advanced Materials (verify the current portal — Wiley has been migrating journals to the Research Exchange / "ReX" platform); confirm account and ORCID requirements on the author page.
  • Color figures are free in Adv. Mater. (online and print) — but still budget figures against the page limit.
  • Keep the SI as a distinct upload, not appended to the main manuscript PDF.
  • Open access is optional: the OnlineOpen APC is high (on the order of ~US$6,000+ — confirm the live figure) and may be covered by a Wiley transformative/DEAL agreement for eligible institutions.
  • If transferred from another Wiley journal, check that the transfer carried the correct files and that the article type is right for Adv. Mater.

Night-before dry run

  1. Clean typeset. Build the manuscript in the Wiley template from scratch to catch the real page count and any broken references.
  2. Page-budget check. Confirm it fits the article-type format with a margin (see advmat-length-management).
  3. Pointer audit. Confirm every "Supporting Information" and "Figure Sx" callout resolves, and no S-item is uncited.
  4. Asset check. TOC graphic + blurb ready; figures at required resolution; SI a separate file.
  5. Metadata dry-fill. Draft the portal fields (title, abstract, keywords, ORCID, funders, declarations) in a text file so the live session is transcription, not composition.
  6. Freeze. No content edits after the dry run; any change reopens the page-budget and pointer audits.

Desk-return triggers to eliminate

TriggerWhy editors bounce it
Wrong article type for the contentRouted off the intended track
Missing / off-spec TOC graphicIncomplete submission
SI appended inside the main PDFBreaks separate-SI production
No benchmarking / incremental framingReads as specialist → desk reject
Missing ORCID / declarationsHeld in editorial screening

Anti-patterns

  • Discovering an overrun only when typeset at production
  • Uploading the SI glued onto the main manuscript PDF
  • Wrong article type (Communication vs. Research Article) for the content
  • Broken "see SI" cross-references after last-minute trimming
  • Forgetting the TOC graphic, ORCID, or a required declaration
  • Not disclosing a prior preprint

Output format

【Article type】Communication / Research Article — matches content?  yes / fix
【Format】Wiley template; within page budget?  yes / fix
【Files】manuscript / figures / SI / TOC graphic / cover letter / bib — all present?
【Metadata】ORCID + keywords + declarations?  yes / fix
【Integrity】originality, preprint disclosure, competing interests, ethics
【Referees】suggested + opposed entered?  yes / fix
【Stands alone】yes / fix
【Next】await reports → advmat-revision; plan referees → advmat-referee-strategy

Attached resources

Portal (Research Exchange/ReX vs. legacy), file specs, TOC-graphic format, APC, and required statements are volatile — verify all on the official Wiley Advanced Materials author page before submitting.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

See all skills by brycewang-stanford

Report a problem with this skill