Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

aejmic-workflow

Use when deciding which aejmic-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md6.8 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

AEJ: Micro Workflow Router (aejmic-workflow)

Overview

This is the router. It tells you which aejmic- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) — the American Economic Association's quarterly journal (founded 2009, one of four AEJs) for microeconomic THEORY and its applications: game theory, mechanism and market design, industrial-organization theory, contract theory, information economics, decision theory, behavioral theory, and theory-grounded experiments. AEJ: Micro is theory-first — it rewards a clean, general, well-motivated result, with structural/experimental applications welcome when the economics is the point.

Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as AEJ: Micro. Operational tells that you are at AEJ: Micro and not a sibling: it wants broad micro interest + the AEA editorial process (vs. specialist JET / GEB / Theoretical Economics); it is less abstract/methodological than TE or Econometrica; and it is theory, not empirical applied micro (that is AEJ: Applied). Process tells: single-blind review via the AEA submission system (author revealed to referees; referees anonymous), a submission fee (AEA member rate — volatile), JEL classification per AEA practice, and the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy for any paper with data, code, experiments, or numerical results. Re-verify volatile specifics on the official AEA pages (see resources/official-source-map.md).

When to trigger

  • The user asks "what should I do next?"
  • A draft needs its current bottleneck diagnosed
  • Work is ping-ponging between the model, the proofs, the framing, and the response letter
  • An AEJ: Micro decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode

Routing table

Current symptomNext skill
Unsure the question is broad-micro-interesting theory (not JET/TE/AEJ:Applied)aejmic-topic-selection
Contribution vs. the closest existing result is fuzzy or oversoldaejmic-literature-positioning
The model, equilibrium concept, or proof architecture is the bottleneckaejmic-theory-model
Unclear what makes the result tight / which assumption is doing the workaejmic-identification
Extensions, edge cases, or (applied) robustness checks are missingaejmic-robustness
Propositions, numerical examples, or experimental exhibits are messyaejmic-tables-figures
Prose buries the result; abstract/intro do not landaejmic-writing-style
Proof appendix, numerical/structural/experimental code deposit, READMEaejmic-replication-package
Want to anticipate referee objections / calibrate desk-reject oddsaejmic-referee-strategy
Ready to submit via the AEA system; need a preflightaejmic-submission
Received an R&R; need a response-letter strategyaejmic-rebuttal

Default order

  1. aejmic-topic-selection — lock a broad-interest microeconomic-theory question
  2. aejmic-literature-positioning — stake the result against the closest theorem
  3. aejmic-theory-model — the central skill: model, equilibrium concept, proof strategy
  4. aejmic-identification — what makes the result tight / what identifies parameters
  5. aejmic-robustness — extensions, edge cases, applied robustness
  6. aejmic-tables-figures — propositions, numerical examples, experimental tables
  7. aejmic-writing-style — make the result land (abstract + intro last)
  8. aejmic-replication-package — proof appendix + code (AEA Data Editor)
  9. aejmic-referee-strategy — pre-empt the objections theory referees raise
  10. aejmic-submission — AEA system preflight (single-blind, JEL, fee)
  11. aejmic-rebuttal — after the R&R

aejmic-writing-style is a late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before the model and proofs settle.

Anti-patterns

  • Polishing prose or exhibits while the model or main proof is still moving — aejmic-theory-model must settle first
  • Treating AEJ: Micro like JET/GEB (specialist, maximal generality) or AEJ: Applied (empirical) — wrong fit gate
  • Deferring the proof appendix and any numerical/experimental code until acceptance — the AEA Data Editor checks before publication
  • Reporting an applied result with significance asterisks instead of standard errors

Routing by paper archetype

AEJ: Micro spans several branches; the bottleneck differs. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.

ArchetypeLikely first bottleneckEnter at
pure theory (mechanism/game/decision)equilibrium concept + proof strategy + generalityaejmic-theory-model
theory with structural estimationparameter identification + counterfactual validityaejmic-identification → aejmic-theory-model
theory-grounded experimentdesign maps to the model's prediction; pre-registrationaejmic-topic-selection → aejmic-identification
IO theory / applied micro-theorythe mechanism's robustness to modeling choicesaejmic-theory-model → aejmic-robustness

Worked routing example (illustrative)

A user says: "My mechanism-design result is proved, but a referee says it hinges on a knife-edge tie-breaking assumption and asks whether it survives a continuum of types." That is two distinct AEJ: Micro pushbacks — which assumption is doing the work (owned by aejmic-identification) and does the mechanism extend (owned by aejmic-robustness), both anchored to aejmic-theory-model. Route to aejmic-theory-model to restate the proof under the relaxed assumption, then aejmic-robustness for the continuum extension; only once the proposition is stable do you return to aejmic-tables-figures and aejmic-rebuttal.

Minimal decision snippet

if decision_letter_arrived:          -> aejmic-rebuttal
elif ready_to_submit:                -> aejmic-submission
elif anticipating_referees:          -> aejmic-referee-strategy
elif proof_appendix_or_code:         -> aejmic-replication-package
elif prose_or_intro:                 -> aejmic-writing-style
elif exhibits_or_examples:           -> aejmic-tables-figures
elif extensions_or_edge_cases:       -> aejmic-robustness
elif which_assumption_or_id:         -> aejmic-identification
elif model_or_proof_unsettled:       -> aejmic-theory-model
elif fit_or_positioning_fuzzy:       -> aejmic-topic-selection / aejmic-literature-positioning
else:                                -> aejmic-topic-selection

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

See all skills by brycewang-stanford

Report a problem with this skill