Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

aeri-submission

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) via the AEA/ScholarOne submission system — the word-count and exhibit-count gates, abstract limit, fees, author metadata, declarations, and the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy. Final checks; it does not draft content.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB
  • templates/checklist.md3.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Submission Preflight (aeri-submission)

When to trigger

  • "Submitting tomorrow" — last check before pressing submit on the AEA portal
  • Verifying the word count and exhibit count clear the auto-return gates
  • Unsure which files, fees, and declarations the AEA system expects
  • Confirming single-blind author metadata, declarations, and the data/code statement

Process facts (official AEA baseline checked 2026-06-20)

  • AER: Insights is an AEA journal for short, single-idea general-interest papers. Submission is through the AEA-linked ScholarOne Manuscripts system.
  • Hard length gate: main text ≤7,000 words with no exhibits; each exhibit subtracts 200 words; maximum five exhibits (figures + tables combined), each ≤1 page. The word count includes body, footnotes, endnotes, and in-paper appendices; it excludes title, authors, abstract, acknowledgement footnote, references, exhibits, and the Supplemental Appendix. Papers over the word or exhibit limit are returned unreviewed.
  • Abstract: ≤100 words.
  • Fees: AEA members — high-income US$200 / middle-income US$100 / low-income US$0; nonmembers — US$300 / US$200 / US$0; papers rejected without review receive a 50 percent submission-fee refund. Publication fee: US$15 per typeset page for applicable submissions.
  • Single-blind review: author identity is visible to referees; referee identity remains anonymous to authors. The manuscript should include title, byline, and author affiliations on the first page, not a separate title page.
  • Metadata: prepare keywords and JEL classifications if the portal prompts for them; use the AEA JEL guide for classification choices.
  • Data and code: submission must comply with the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy; data, code, and documentation sufficient for replication are required before acceptance, verified by the AEA Data Editor (deposit to the AEA Data and Code Repository / openICPSR). See aeri-replication-package.

Preflight checklist

Length & format (the auto-return gates)

  • Main text ≤ 7,000 − 200 × (#exhibits) words, counted per the AEA scope rules above
  • ≤5 exhibits (figures + tables), each ≤1 page
  • Abstract ≤100 words
  • No asterisks/boldface for significance; SEs / confidence sets reported
  • Supplemental Appendix carries everything pushed out of the main text

Author metadata & declarations

  • Title, byline, and author affiliations appear on the manuscript first page; no separate title page
  • Acknowledgement footnote covers email, author order, funding, personal acknowledgements, IRB details if applicable, and RCT registration if applicable
  • Keywords and JEL classifications prepared if requested by the portal

Files, fees & declarations

  • Main manuscript PDF, word-count PDF/record, and Supplemental Appendix uploaded as the system expects
  • Submission fee ready for the correct member/income band; publication-fee implications understood
  • AEA Data and Code Availability Policy acknowledged; data/code plan ready
  • Separate disclosure statement for each author; AI not listed as an author; AI use disclosed if applicable; not under review elsewhere

Counting words the way the AEA counts them

The auto-return gate is enforced on a specific scope, so count it correctly:

  • Include: the main body, footnotes, endnotes, and in-paper appendices.
  • Exclude: title, author names, abstract, the acknowledgement footnote, the reference list, the exhibits themselves, and the Supplemental Appendix.
  • Then subtract 200 words per exhibit from the 7,000 ceiling: a paper with five exhibits has a 6,000-word main-text budget. A common mistake is counting only the body and forgetting footnotes/in-paper appendices, then discovering the true count is over at the portal.

Reconcile this with aeri-writing-style (cutting to the cap) and aeri-tables-figures (the exhibit budget) before you reach the portal.

Anti-patterns

  • Submitting over the word or exhibit cap (auto-return without review)
  • Abstract over 100 words; exhibits over one page
  • Stripping author information as if identities were hidden from referees, contrary to AEA single-blind instructions
  • Significance asterisks/boldface in exhibits
  • Treating the data/code policy as a post-acceptance afterthought

Output format

【Word count】main text = __ ; cap = 7000 − 200×__ = __ ; under? [Y/N]
【Exhibits】__ / 5, each ≤1 page? [Y/N]
【Abstract】__ words (≤100?) [Y/N]
【Author metadata】title/byline/affiliations and acknowledgement footnote complete? [Y/N]
【Classifications】keywords/JEL ready if portal prompts? [Y/N]
【Fee + declarations + data/code】fee ready; disclosures/AI/data policy acknowledged? [Y/N]
【Next step】submit via AEA portal → aeri-referee-strategy for what to expect

Supplementary resources

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

See all skills by brycewang-stanford

Report a problem with this skill