Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

aistats-camera-ready

Use when preparing accepted AISTATS papers for PMLR camera-ready submission, covering the 9-page final body, two-column layout reflow, author de-anonymization, proceedings forms, metadata, final appendix handling, registration, in-person presentation obligations, and public artifact release.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.4 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

AISTATS Camera Ready

Use this after acceptance. Reopen the current AISTATS camera-ready instructions, PMLR author kit, registration page, presentation policy, and OpenReview decision email before advising authors.

Camera-ready audit

  • Convert the anonymous submission to the public proceedings version: names, affiliations, acknowledgements, funding, code/data links, and author metadata.
  • Apply the current final-page limit. AISTATS 2026 allowed a 9-page camera-ready body, excluding references and supplementary material.
  • Check PMLR formatting, title/abstract metadata, author order, bibliography, appendix placement, and any required release or copyright forms.
  • Resolve reviewer and meta-review concerns without changing the accepted contribution beyond normal camera-ready clarification.
  • Prepare public artifacts: repository, data, model checkpoints, environment files, and archival links after anonymity no longer matters.
  • Confirm registration and presentation obligations. AISTATS 2026 required in-person attendance by at least one author for each accepted paper, with no remote presentation.

PMLR two-column reflow

  • AISTATS proceedings use a two-column PMLR layout; switching the style file from anonymous to accepted mode changes spacing, so recheck every page break, figure placement, and table width after the flip.
  • Wide theorem environments, long display equations, and multi-panel rate plots often need full-width spans; verify nothing is clipped at column boundaries.
  • Material that fit the submission body can overflow once the author block, acknowledgements, and funding lines are added; the extra camera-ready page usually absorbs this, but confirm rather than assume.
  • Keep theorem, assumption, and equation numbering identical to the reviewed version so the meta-review and discussion record remain traceable to the final text.

De-anonymization sweep

  • Restore the author block, acknowledgements, grants, and any contribution statements the anonymous version stripped.
  • Rewrite self-citations into natural first-person form where it improves clarity.
  • Replace anonymized repository placeholders with the public, licensed, citable archive and test every link from a logged-out browser.

Worked example: integrating a reviewer fix

The meta-review asked that a bounded-noise assumption move from the appendix into the main text. Camera-ready move: add the assumption to the theorem statement, one justification sentence, and a pointer to the appendix discussion — without strengthening the result into something the reviewers never evaluated.

Hedged logistics

  • Registration pricing, copyright-form mechanics, and exact camera-ready dates change every cycle; confirm against the decision email and the current proceedings instructions.

Output format

[Camera-ready status] Ready / Needs fixes / Blocked
[Final package] <PDF/source/bib/metadata/PMLR forms/artifacts>
[Policy checks] <page/authors/presentation/registration/artifact release>
[Reviewer-change map] <concern -> final edit>
[Remaining owner] <person -> task>

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

See all skills by brycewang-stanford

Report a problem with this skill