Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

aos-tables-figures

Use when building the exhibits of an Accounting, Organizations and Society (AOS) manuscript — data-inventory and evidence tables for qualitative work, cell-means and process-test tables for experiments, and figures that carry theoretical weight — in Elsevier-compatible format. Builds exhibits; it does not run the analysis (aos-data-analysis).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Tables & Figures (aos-tables-figures)

When to trigger

  • A field paper has long quotations but no exhibit showing the evidentiary base
  • Experimental results lack a clean cell-means or contrast table
  • A figure decorates rather than argues (or a needed process figure is missing)
  • Formatting must be reconciled with Elsevier submission requirements

Exhibits by tradition — what AOS reviewers look for

Qualitative field / historical papers

  • Data-inventory table: interviews (number, roles, duration, period), observations (events, hours), documents (types, spans) — the single exhibit that preempts "how much data is behind this?"
  • Evidence table(s): conceptual claim or second-order theme in one column, representative field excerpts in the other, so the interpretive chain is inspectable without bloating the text.
  • Coding-structure exhibit where the paper's method warrants it: first-order codes → second-order categories → aggregate concepts, showing movement from informant language to theory.
  • Timeline or process figure for change studies: phases, key events, and where the accounting practice intervened.
  • Anonymize consistently — pseudonyms and role labels in exhibits must match the text and betray no site identity.

Experimental / survey papers

  • Cell-means table: means, SDs, n per condition; the predicted pattern visible at a glance.
  • Contrast/ANOVA table plus process results (mediation with bootstrap CIs) as exhibits, not prose asides.
  • An interaction figure with error bars when a moderation is the theory's signature; axis units interpretable, no truncated scales that exaggerate effects.
  • Survey papers: construct table (items, sources, reliabilities) and a correlation matrix.

Archival-with-theory papers

  • Descriptives, the main estimation table with clustering and fixed-effects structure stated in the notes, and magnitudes interpreted in institutional terms.

Self-containment and format

  • Every exhibit readable alone: title stating what it shows, sample/period, definitions, and the meaning of any markers in the notes.
  • Number tables and figures consecutively; place callouts in the text; Elsevier prefers editable source files for tables and high-resolution figure files at final stages — confirm current artwork specs in the AOS Guide for Authors before submission.
  • Keep exhibits inside the double-anonymized envelope: no author names in captions, file names, or embedded metadata.
  • Ration exhibits: each one must carry evidence or structure the argument; move genuinely supplementary material to an appendix or online supplement.

The one-sentence test

For every exhibit, write the sentence it proves ("Table 2 shows the interpretation rests on 74 interviews across four roles over 26 months"; "Figure 3 shows the effect reverses under high accountability"). If no sentence exists, cut the exhibit; if the sentence is central and no exhibit backs it, build one.

Checklist

  • (Qualitative) data-inventory table present; evidence/coding exhibits trace claims to material
  • (Experimental) cell means, contrasts, process tests, and the key interaction figure present
  • Every exhibit passes the one-sentence test and is self-contained
  • Pseudonyms/labels consistent across text and exhibits; anonymity preserved
  • Numbering, callouts, and artwork specs match the current Guide for Authors
  • No exhibit metadata or file name identifies the authors or the site

Anti-patterns

  • Quote dumps in tables — excerpts without the conceptual column that gives them a job.
  • Decorative frameworks: boxes-and-arrows figures that restate the table of contents.
  • Cell-means tables missing n or SDs, or interaction plots without uncertainty.
  • Exhibit inflation: ten tables where three would carry the argument.
  • Anonymity leaks through logos, letterheads, or document scans reproduced in figures.

Output format

【Exhibit list】each with its one-sentence job ...
【Data inventory (qual)】interviews / observations / documents tabulated? ...
【Process exhibits (exp)】cell means, contrasts, mediation, interaction figure ...
【Self-containment】titles, notes, definitions complete? ...
【Anonymity & format】pseudonyms consistent; Elsevier artwork specs checked ...
【Next step】aos-writing-style

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1.3KUpdated Sep 27, 2026

See all skills by brycewang-stanford

Report a problem with this skill