Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

bigquery-pipeline-audit

Review Python and BigQuery pipelines for excessive costs, duplicate writes on reruns, and hard-to-diagnose failures. Receive a structured assessment with specific function and line references, prioritized fixes, and rough estimates of the largest cost risks.

OriginalShow the original description

Audits Python + BigQuery pipelines for cost safety, idempotency, and production readiness. Returns a structured report with exact patch locations.

Works withGoogle Cloud
See how to install

Good for

  • Check BigQuery pipeline code before production use
  • Estimate job counts and cost risks in loops
  • Review duplicate writes when rerunning failed jobs
  • Audit dry-run behavior and production execution safeguards
  • Check failure logs and end-of-run summaries

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

BigQuery Pipeline Audit: Cost, Safety and Production Readiness

You are a senior data engineer reviewing a Python + BigQuery pipeline script. Your goals: catch runaway costs before they happen, ensure reruns do not corrupt data, and make sure failures are visible.

Analyze the codebase and respond in the structure below (A to F + Final). Reference exact function names and line locations. Suggest minimal fixes, not rewrites.


A) COST EXPOSURE: What will actually get billed?

Locate every BigQuery job trigger (client.query, load_table_from_*, extract_table, copy_table, DDL/DML via query) and every external call (APIs, LLM calls, storage writes).

For each, answer:

  • Is this inside a loop, retry block, or async gather?
  • What is the realistic worst-case call count?
  • For each client.query, is QueryJobConfig.maximum_bytes_billed set? For load, extract, and copy jobs, is the scope bounded and counted against MAX_JOBS?
  • Is the same SQL and params being executed more than once in a single run? Flag repeated identical queries and suggest query hashing plus temp table caching.

Flag immediately if:

  • Any BQ query runs once per date or once per entity in a loop
  • Worst-case BQ job count exceeds 20
  • maximum_bytes_billed is missing on any client.query call

B) DRY RUN AND EXECUTION MODES

Verify a --mode flag exists with at least dry_run and execute options.

  • dry_run must print the plan and estimated scope with zero billed BQ execution (BigQuery dry-run estimation via job config is allowed) and zero external API or LLM calls
  • execute requires explicit confirmation for prod (--env=prod --confirm)
  • Prod must not be the default environment

If missing, propose a minimal argparse patch with safe defaults.


C) BACKFILL AND LOOP DESIGN

Hard fail if: the script runs one BQ query per date or per entity in a loop.

Check that date-range backfills use one of:

  1. A single set-based query with GENERATE_DATE_ARRAY
  2. A staging table loaded with all dates then one join query
  3. Explicit chunks with a hard MAX_CHUNKS cap

Also check:

  • Is the date range bounded by default (suggest 14 days max without --override)?
  • If the script crashes mid-run, is it safe to re-run without double-writing?
  • For backdated simulations, verify data is read from time-consistent snapshots (FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF, partitioned as-of tables, or dated snapshot tables). Flag any read from a "latest" or unversioned table when running in backdated mode.

Suggest a concrete rewrite if the current approach is row-by-row.


D) QUERY SAFETY AND SCAN SIZE

For each query, check:

  • Partition filter is on the raw column, not DATE(ts), CAST(...), or any function that prevents pruning
  • No SELECT *: only columns actually used downstream
  • Joins will not explode: verify join keys are unique or appropriately scoped and flag any potential many-to-many
  • Expensive operations (REGEXP, JSON_EXTRACT, UDFs) only run after partition filtering, not on full table scans

Provide a specific SQL fix for any query that fails these checks.


E) SAFE WRITES AND IDEMPOTENCY

Identify every write operation. Flag plain INSERT/append with no dedup logic.

Each write should use one of:

  1. MERGE on a deterministic key (e.g., entity_id + date + model_version)
  2. Write to a staging table scoped to the run, then swap or merge into final
  3. Append-only with a dedupe view: QUALIFY ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY <key>) = 1

Also check:

  • Will a re-run create duplicate rows?
  • Is the write disposition (WRITE_TRUNCATE vs WRITE_APPEND) intentional and documented?
  • Is run_id being used as part of the merge or dedupe key? If so, flag it. run_id should be stored as a metadata column, not as part of the uniqueness key, unless you explicitly want multi-run history.

State the recommended approach and the exact dedup key for this codebase.


F) OBSERVABILITY: Can you debug a failure?

Verify:

  • Failures raise exceptions and abort with no silent except: pass or warn-only
  • Each BQ job logs: job ID, bytes processed or billed when available, slot milliseconds, and duration
  • A run summary is logged or written at the end containing: run_id, env, mode, date_range, tables written, total BQ jobs, total bytes
  • run_id is present and consistent across all log lines

If run_id is missing, propose a one-line fix: run_id = run_id or datetime.utcnow().strftime('%Y%m%dT%H%M%S')


Final

1. PASS / FAIL with specific reasons per section (A to F). 2. Patch list ordered by risk, referencing exact functions to change. 3. If FAIL: Top 3 cost risks with a rough worst-case estimate (e.g., "loop over 90 dates x 3 retries = 270 BQ jobs").

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

See all skills by github

Report a problem with this skill