Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

bug-reproduction-brief

Turn incomplete or intermittent bug reports into a minimal reproduction backed by recorded evidence. Capture the environment, expected and actual results, commands, and remaining unknowns in a brief before diagnosis or repair.

OriginalShow the original description

Turn a vague, intermittent, or environment-specific bug report into a minimal evidence-backed reproduction before proposing a fix.

See how to install

Good for

  • Clarifying an incomplete bug report
  • Recording how often an intermittent failure occurs
  • Documenting an environment-specific failure
  • Reducing a failing test to a minimal fixture

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Bug Reproduction Brief

Use this skill when a bug report is incomplete, intermittent, environment-specific, or mixed with an assumed cause. The goal is to prove the smallest observable failure before diagnosis or repair begins.

1. Record the observed failure

Capture the exact error, incorrect output, timestamp, affected route or command, and the smallest known input. Preserve relevant logs without secrets or personal data. Label second-hand descriptions as unverified.

2. Identify the environment

Record only facts you can inspect:

  • repository and commit;
  • runtime and package-manager versions;
  • operating system or container;
  • dependency lockfile;
  • relevant feature flags;
  • whether the target is local, test, staging, or production.

Never guess credentials or production configuration.

3. Separate expected from actual behaviour

Write two explicit observable statements:

Expected: [observable result]
Actual:   [observable result, including status or error]

Do not put the suspected cause in either statement.

4. Reduce the reproduction

Start from the reported path, then remove unrelated data, services, and steps one at a time. Keep the smallest fixture that still fails. If the failure stops, restore the last removed condition and record it.

Prefer an isolated test, minimal script, or smallest safe request over reproducing against production.

5. Prove repeatability

Run the minimal reproduction at least twice where safe. Record commands and outputs. If the failure is intermittent, report the observed frequency and duration instead of calling it deterministic.

6. Stop before repair

A verified reproduction is the deliverable. Do not edit implementation code while building the brief because that can destroy the evidence or mix diagnosis with remediation.

Output

# Bug Reproduction Brief

- Target and commit:
- Environment:
- Expected:
- Actual:
- Minimal steps:
- Minimal fixture:
- Reproduced: yes / no / intermittent
- Evidence:
- Unknowns:
- Safe next hypothesis to test:

Safety boundaries

  • Do not change production data merely to reproduce a bug.
  • Do not publish secrets, customer records, or private source.
  • Do not claim a root cause from correlation alone.
  • Use read-only or reversible discovery first.
  • Stop after a verified reproduction; diagnosis and repair are separate workflows.

Example prompt

Use the Bug Reproduction Brief skill on the failing checkout test. Do not fix it yet. Reduce it to the smallest safe failing fixture and report the exact command evidence, expected result, actual result, and remaining unknowns.

Source and licence

Adapted from the MIT-licensed workflow at https://github.com/skyestrela/ai-agent-skill-preview.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 20, 2026

See all skills by github

Report a problem with this skill