Review Git changes and prepare consistent commit messages using Conventional Commits, a format that labels each change by type and scope. The workflow includes message validation, optional explanatory details, and committing changes through Copilot.
Prompt and workflow for generating conventional commit messages using a structured XML format. Guides users to create standardized, descriptive commit messages in line with the Conventional Commits specification, including instructions, examples, and validation.
Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
<description>This file contains a prompt template for generating conventional commit messages. It provides instructions, examples, and formatting guidelines to help users write standardized, descriptive commit messages in accordance with the Conventional Commits specification.</description>
Follow these steps:
git status to review changed files.git diff or git diff --cached to inspect changes.git add <file>.git commit -m "type(scope): description"
<commit-message>
<type>feat|fix|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|chore|revert</type>
<scope>()</scope>
<description>A short, imperative summary of the change</description>
<body>(optional: more detailed explanation)</body>
<footer>(optional: e.g. BREAKING CHANGE: details, or issue references)</footer>
</commit-message>
<examples>
<example>feat(parser): add ability to parse arrays</example>
<example>fix(ui): correct button alignment</example>
<example>docs: update README with usage instructions</example>
<example>refactor: improve performance of data processing</example>
<example>chore: update dependencies</example>
<example>feat!: send email on registration (BREAKING CHANGE: email service required)</example>
</examples>
<validation>
<type>Must be one of the allowed types. See <reference>https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#specification</reference></type>
<scope>Optional, but recommended for clarity.</scope>
<description>Required. Use the imperative mood (e.g., "add", not "added").</description>
<body>Optional. Use for additional context.</body>
<footer>Use for breaking changes or issue references.</footer>
</validation>
<final-step>
<cmd>git commit -m "type(scope): description"</cmd>
<note>Replace with your constructed message. Include body and footer if needed.</note>
</final-step>
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.
Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.
Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.
Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.
Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.
Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.