Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

csharp-docs

Write consistent XML documentation comments for C# types and public members. Follow specific rules for summaries, parameters, return values, properties, exceptions, examples, and inherited documentation so API behavior and usage are clearly described alongside the code.

OriginalShow the original description

Ensure that C# types are documented with XML comments and follow best practices for documentation.

See how to install

Good for

  • Adding documentation to public APIs
  • Standardizing parameter and return value descriptions
  • Documenting exception conditions and usage examples
  • Clarifying inherited behavior and complex internal members

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

C# Documentation Best Practices

  • Public members should be documented with XML comments.
  • It is encouraged to document internal members as well, especially if they are complex or not self-explanatory.

Guidance for all APIs

  • Use <summary> to provide a brief, one sentence, description of what the type or member does. Start the summary with a present-tense, third-person verb.
  • Use <remarks> for additional information, which can include implementation details, usage notes, or any other relevant context.
  • Use <see langword> for language-specific keywords like null, true, false, int, bool, etc.
  • Use <c> for inline code snippets.
  • Use <example> for usage examples on how to use the member.
    • Use <code> for code blocks. <code> tags should be placed within an <example> tag. Add the language of the code example using the language attribute, for example, <code language="csharp">.
  • Use <see cref> to reference other types or members inline (in a sentence).
  • Use <seealso> for standalone (not in a sentence) references to other types or members in the "See also" section of the online docs.
  • Use <inheritdoc/> to inherit documentation from base classes or interfaces.
    • Unless there is major behavior change, in which case you should document the differences.

Methods

  • Use <param> to describe method parameters.
    • The description should be a noun phrase that doesn't specify the data type.
    • Begin with an introductory article.
    • If the parameter is a flag enum, start the description with "A bitwise combination of the enumeration values that specifies...".
    • If the parameter is a non-flag enum, start the description with "One of the enumeration values that specifies...".
    • If the parameter is a Boolean, the wording should be of the form "<see langword="true" /> to ...; otherwise, <see langword="false" />.".
    • If the parameter is an "out" parameter, the wording should be of the form "When this method returns, contains .... This parameter is treated as uninitialized.".
  • Use <paramref> to reference parameter names in documentation.
  • Use <typeparam> to describe type parameters in generic types or methods.
  • Use <typeparamref> to reference type parameters in documentation.
  • Use <returns> to describe what the method returns.
    • The description should be a noun phrase that doesn't specify the data type.
    • Begin with an introductory article.
    • If the return type is Boolean, the wording should be of the form "<see langword="true" /> if ...; otherwise, <see langword="false" />.".

Constructors

  • The summary wording should be "Initializes a new instance of the <Class> class [or struct].".

Properties

  • The <summary> should start with:
    • "Gets or sets..." for a read-write property.
    • "Gets..." for a read-only property.
    • "Gets [or sets] a value that indicates whether..." for properties that return a Boolean value.
  • Use <value> to describe the value of the property.
    • The description should be a noun phrase that doesn't specify the data type.
    • If the property has a default value, add it in a separate sentence, for example, "The default is <see langword="false" />".
    • If the value type is Boolean, the wording should be of the form "<see langword="true" /> if ...; otherwise, <see langword="false" />. The default is ...".

Exceptions

  • Use <exception cref> to document exceptions thrown by constructors, properties, indexers, methods, operators, and events.
  • Document all exceptions thrown directly by the member.
  • For exceptions thrown by nested members, document only the exceptions users are most likely to encounter.
  • The description of the exception describes the condition under which it's thrown.
    • Omit "Thrown if ..." or "If ..." at the beginning of the sentence. Just state the condition directly, for example "An error occurred when accessing a Message Queuing API."

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

See all skills by github

Report a problem with this skill