Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

csharp-tunit

Write C# unit tests with TUnit using clear test structure, asynchronous checks, and multiple input cases. Get guidance on setup and cleanup, execution controls, test organization, and converting existing xUnit tests to TUnit.

OriginalShow the original description

Get best practices for TUnit unit testing, including data-driven tests

See how to install

Good for

  • Setting up a TUnit test project
  • Testing one behavior with multiple input cases
  • Organizing test setup and cleanup
  • Migrating xUnit tests to TUnit

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md5.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

TUnit Best Practices

Your goal is to help me write effective unit tests with TUnit, covering both standard and data-driven testing approaches.

Project Setup

  • Use a separate test project with naming convention [ProjectName].Tests
  • Reference TUnit package and TUnit.Assertions for fluent assertions
  • Create test classes that match the classes being tested (e.g., CalculatorTests for Calculator)
  • Use .NET SDK test commands: dotnet test for running tests
  • TUnit requires .NET 8.0 or higher

Test Structure

  • No test class attributes required (like xUnit/NUnit)
  • Use [Test] attribute for test methods (not [Fact] like xUnit)
  • Follow the Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern
  • Name tests using the pattern MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior
  • Use lifecycle hooks: [Before(Test)] for setup and [After(Test)] for teardown
  • Use [Before(Class)] and [After(Class)] for shared context between tests in a class
  • Use [Before(Assembly)] and [After(Assembly)] for shared context across test classes
  • TUnit supports advanced lifecycle hooks like [Before(TestSession)] and [After(TestSession)]

Standard Tests

  • Keep tests focused on a single behavior
  • Avoid testing multiple behaviors in one test method
  • Use TUnit's fluent assertion syntax with await Assert.That()
  • Include only the assertions needed to verify the test case
  • Make tests independent and idempotent (can run in any order)
  • Avoid test interdependencies (use [DependsOn] attribute if needed)

Data-Driven Tests

  • Use [Arguments] attribute for inline test data (equivalent to xUnit's [InlineData])
  • Use [MethodData] for method-based test data (equivalent to xUnit's [MemberData])
  • Use [ClassData] for class-based test data
  • Create custom data sources by implementing ITestDataSource
  • Use meaningful parameter names in data-driven tests
  • Multiple [Arguments] attributes can be applied to the same test method

Assertions

  • Use await Assert.That(value).IsEqualTo(expected) for value equality
  • Use await Assert.That(value).IsSameReferenceAs(expected) for reference equality
  • Use await Assert.That(value).IsTrue() or await Assert.That(value).IsFalse() for boolean conditions
  • Use await Assert.That(collection).Contains(item) or await Assert.That(collection).DoesNotContain(item) for collections
  • Use await Assert.That(value).Matches(pattern) for regex pattern matching
  • Use await Assert.That(action).Throws<TException>() or await Assert.That(asyncAction).ThrowsAsync<TException>() to test exceptions
  • Chain assertions with .And operator: await Assert.That(value).IsNotNull().And.IsEqualTo(expected)
  • Use .Or operator for alternative conditions: await Assert.That(value).IsEqualTo(1).Or.IsEqualTo(2)
  • Use .Within(tolerance) for DateTime and numeric comparisons with tolerance
  • All assertions are asynchronous and must be awaited

Advanced Features

  • Use [Repeat(n)] to repeat tests multiple times
  • Use [Retry(n)] for automatic retry on failure
  • Use [ParallelLimit<T>] to control parallel execution limits
  • Use [Skip("reason")] to skip tests conditionally
  • Use [DependsOn(nameof(OtherTest))] to create test dependencies
  • Use [Timeout(milliseconds)] to set test timeouts
  • Create custom attributes by extending TUnit's base attributes

Test Organization

  • Group tests by feature or component
  • Use [Category("CategoryName")] for test categorization
  • Use [DisplayName("Custom Test Name")] for custom test names
  • Consider using TestContext for test diagnostics and information
  • Use conditional attributes like custom [WindowsOnly] for platform-specific tests

Performance and Parallel Execution

  • TUnit runs tests in parallel by default (unlike xUnit which requires explicit configuration)
  • Use [NotInParallel] to disable parallel execution for specific tests
  • Use [ParallelLimit<T>] with custom limit classes to control concurrency
  • Tests within the same class run sequentially by default
  • Use [Repeat(n)] with [ParallelLimit<T>] for load testing scenarios

Migration from xUnit

  • Replace [Fact] with [Test]
  • Replace [Theory] with [Test] and use [Arguments] for data
  • Replace [InlineData] with [Arguments]
  • Replace [MemberData] with [MethodData]
  • Replace Assert.Equal with await Assert.That(actual).IsEqualTo(expected)
  • Replace Assert.True with await Assert.That(condition).IsTrue()
  • Replace Assert.Throws<T> with await Assert.That(action).Throws<T>()
  • Replace constructor/IDisposable with [Before(Test)]/[After(Test)]
  • Replace IClassFixture<T> with [Before(Class)]/[After(Class)]

Why TUnit over xUnit?

TUnit offers a modern, fast, and flexible testing experience with advanced features not present in xUnit, such as asynchronous assertions, more refined lifecycle hooks, and improved data-driven testing capabilities. TUnit's fluent assertions provide clearer and more expressive test validation, making it especially suitable for complex .NET projects.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

See all skills by github

Report a problem with this skill