Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

gen-specs-as-issues

Compare project documentation with existing code to identify missing core features. Rank the gaps and create GitHub issues with practical specifications, implementation plans, acceptance criteria, effort estimates, and dependencies.

OriginalShow the original description

This workflow guides you through a systematic approach to identify missing features, prioritize them, and create detailed specifications for implementation.

See how to install

Good for

  • Find documented features missing from the implementation
  • Prioritize gaps in core product functionality
  • Turn feature gaps into actionable GitHub issues
  • Split large features into smaller tasks with clear dependencies

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md5.7 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Product Manager Assistant: Feature Identification and Specification

This workflow guides you through a systematic approach to identify missing features, prioritize them, and create detailed specifications for implementation.

1. Project Understanding Phase

  • Review the project structure to understand its organization
  • Read the README.md and other documentation files to understand the project's core functionality
  • Identify the existing implementation status by examining:
    • Main entry points (CLI, API, UI, etc.)
    • Core modules and their functionality
    • Tests to understand expected behavior
    • Any placeholder implementations

Guiding Questions:

  • What is the primary purpose of this project?
  • What user problems does it solve?
  • What patterns exist in the current implementation?
  • Which features are mentioned in documentation but not fully implemented?

2. Gap Analysis Phase

  • Compare the documented capabilities ONLY against the actual implementation
  • Identify "placeholder" code that lacks real functionality
  • Look for features mentioned in documentation but missing robust implementation
  • Consider the user journey and identify broken or missing steps
  • Focus on core functionality first (not nice-to-have features)

Output Creation:

  • Create a list of potential missing features (5-7 items)
  • For each feature, note:
    • Current implementation status
    • References in documentation
    • Impact on user experience if missing

3. Prioritization Phase

  • Apply a score to each identified gap:

Scoring Matrix (1-5 scale):

  • User Impact: How many users benefit?
  • Strategic Alignment: Fits core mission?
  • Implementation Feasibility: Technical complexity?
  • Resource Requirements: Development effort needed?
  • Risk Level: Potential negative impacts?

Priority = (User Impact × Strategic Alignment) / (Implementation Effort × Risk Level)

Output Creation:

  • Present the top 3 highest-priority missing features based on the scoring
  • For each, provide:
    • Feature name
    • Current status
    • Impact if not implemented
    • Dependencies on other features

4. Specification Development Phase

  • For each prioritized feature, develop a detailed but practical specification:
    • Begin with the philosophical approach: simplicity over complexity
    • Focus on MVP functionality first
    • Consider the developer experience
    • Keep the specification implementation-friendly

For Each Feature Specification:

  1. Overview & Scope

    • What problem does it solve?
    • What's included and what's explicitly excluded?
  2. Technical Requirements

    • Core functionality needed
    • User-facing interfaces (API, UI, CLI, etc.)
    • Integration points with existing code
  3. Implementation Plan

    • Key modules/files to create or modify
    • Simple code examples showing the approach
    • Clear data structures and interfaces
  4. Acceptance Criteria

    • How will we know when it's done?
    • What specific functionality must work?
    • What tests should pass?

5. GitHub Issue Creation Phase

  • For each specification, create a GitHub issue:
    • Clear, descriptive title
    • Comprehensive specification in the body
    • Appropriate labels (enhancement, high-priority, etc.)
    • Explicitly mention MVP philosophy where relevant

Issue Template Structure:

[Feature Name]

Overview

[Brief description of the feature and its purpose]

Scope

[What's included and what's explicitly excluded]

Technical Requirements

[Specific technical needs and constraints]

Implementation Plan

[Step-by-step approach with simple code examples]

Acceptance Criteria

[Clear list of requirements to consider the feature complete]

Priority

[Justification for prioritization]

Dependencies

  • Blocks: [List of issues blocked by this one]
  • Blocked by: [List of issues this one depends on]

Implementation Size

  • Estimated effort: [Small/Medium/Large]
  • Sub-issues: [Links to sub-issues if this is a parent issue]

5.5 Work Distribution Optimization

  • Independence Analysis

    • Review each specification to identify truly independent components
    • Refactor specifications to maximize independent work streams
    • Create clear boundaries between interdependent components
  • Dependency Mapping

    • For features with unavoidable dependencies, establish clear issue hierarchies
    • Create parent issues for the overall feature with sub-issues for components
    • Explicitly document "blocked by" and "blocks" relationships
  • Workload Balancing

    • Break down large specifications into smaller, manageable sub-issues
    • Ensure each sub-issue represents 1-3 days of development work
    • Include sub-issue specific acceptance criteria

Implementation Guidelines:

  • Use GitHub issue linking syntax to create explicit relationships
  • Add labels to indicate dependency status (e.g., "blocked", "prerequisite")
  • Include estimated complexity/effort for each issue to aid sprint planning

6. Final Review Phase

  • Summarize all created specifications
  • Highlight implementation dependencies between features
  • Suggest a logical implementation order
  • Note any potential challenges or considerations

Remember throughout this process:

  • Favor simplicity over complexity
  • Start with minimal viable implementations that work
  • Focus on developer experience
  • Build a foundation that can be extended later
  • Consider the open-source community and contribution model

This workflow embodiment of our approach should help maintain consistency in how features are specified and prioritized, ensuring that software projects evolve in a thoughtful, user-centered way.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

See all skills by github

Report a problem with this skill