Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

pester-should-migration

Update Pester test assertions, checks of expected results, from classic v5 syntax to v6 Should-* commands. Identify behavior changes involving booleans, empty values, and collections, then verify the suite and report conversions needing human judgment.

OriginalShow the original description

Experimental (preview) Pester skill for migrating classic Should -Be (v5) assertion syntax to the new Should-* (v6) assertions (note the hyphen, no space), e.g. `Should -Be` -> `Should-Be`, `Should -Not -Be` -> `Should-NotBe`. Tracks Pester 6, which is still a release candidate, so this guidance may change; verified against Pester 6.0.0-rc2. Use when converting Pester v5 assertions to Pester v6 Should-* operators, modernizing a Pester test suite, or when a user asks to migrate, convert, or rewrite `Should -...` calls in .Tests.ps1 / PowerShell files.

See how to install

Good for

  • Convert assertions in PowerShell test files
  • Adopt Should-* syntax one file at a time
  • Review boolean, empty-value, and collection checks
  • Disable classic syntax after completing migration

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md7.7 KB
  • references/assertion-map.md9.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Pester Should -* → Should-* Migration

Convert classic Pester v5 assertions (Should -Be, space then parameter) to the new Pester v6 Should-* assertions (Should-Be, hyphen, no space).

Status: experimental / preview. Verified against Pester 6.0.0-rc2. The classic Should -Be style still works in v6, so migrate incrementally and keep the suite green.

Companion skill. This skill covers the optional move to the new Should-* operators. To upgrade a suite across major Pester versions (v3→v4→v5→v6 — the runtime, mocks, and config), use the separate pester-migration skill. In v6 the classic Should -Be keeps working, so adopting Should-* is independent of any version bump.

When to Use

  • Modernizing a Pester suite to the v6 Should-* assertions.
  • A user asks to migrate / convert / rewrite Should -... calls.
  • You want clearer, type-aware failure messages from the new assertions.

Know This First

  • Both syntaxes work side by side in Pester v6. Migration is optional and can be done one test (or one file) at a time. Nothing breaks if you leave some classic.
  • Requires Pester v6+. The Should-* commands do not exist in v5.
  • Negation is a separate command, not a -Not switch: Should -Not -Be → Should-NotBe. There is no -Not parameter on the new assertions.
  • The actual value still comes from the pipeline ($x | Should-Be 1) or from -Actual (Should-Be -Actual $x -Expected 1). -Because carries over unchanged.
  • Most renames are mechanical, but several have behavior changes you must check by hand — see Gotchas.

Procedure

Step 1 — Find the classic assertions

Search the target for the classic space-separated syntax (the tell is Should -, or Should followed by -Not):

Should -          # any classic operator
Should -Not -     # negated classic operator
Assert-MockCalled # also removed in v6 -> Should-Invoke

Limit the scope to PowerShell test files (*.Tests.ps1, *.ps1).

Step 2 — Apply the mapping

Most-used conversions (full list in references/assertion-map.md):

Classic (v5)New (v6)
$x | Should -Be 1$x | Should-Be 1
$x | Should -Not -Be 1$x | Should-NotBe 1
$x | Should -BeExactly 'A'$x | Should-BeString 'A' -CaseSensitive
$x | Should -BeGreaterOrEqual 2$x | Should-BeGreaterThanOrEqual 2
$x | Should -BeLessOrEqual 2$x | Should-BeLessThanOrEqual 2
$x | Should -BeLike 'a*'$x | Should-BeLikeString 'a*'
$x | Should -Match 're'$x | Should-MatchString 're'
$x | Should -BeOfType [int]$x | Should-HaveType ([int])
$x | Should -BeNullOrEmptydepends — see gotchas (no single equivalent)
$c | Should -HaveCount 3$c | Should-BeCollection -Count 3
$c | Should -Contain 2$c | Should-ContainCollection 2
{ ... } | Should -Throw 'msg'{ ... } | Should-Throw -ExceptionMessage 'msg'
Should -Invoke Get-ThingShould-Invoke Get-Thing
Should -InvokeVerifiableShould-Invoke -Verifiable

Step 3 — Check the behavioral gotchas (do NOT skip)

These do not translate by a plain rename. Read each before converting:

  1. Case sensitivity. Classic Should -Be is case-insensitive on strings; so is Should-Be. But classic Should -BeExactly (case-sensitive) has no plain equivalent — use Should-BeString -CaseSensitive. (Should-Be is never case-sensitive.) Same pattern for BeLikeExactly → Should-BeLikeString -CaseSensitive and MatchExactly → Should-MatchString -CaseSensitive.
  2. Truthy vs. true. Classic Should -BeTrue / -BeFalse accept any truthy / falsy value (1, 'x', 0, '', $null, @()). The new Should-BeTrue / Should-BeFalse are strict (exactly $true / $false). To preserve the old loose behavior use Should-BeTruthy / Should-BeFalsy. Only use the strict ones when the value really is a boolean.
  3. BeNullOrEmpty has no single equivalent. Pick by intent: $null → Should-BeNull; empty string → Should-BeEmptyString; empty collection → Should-BeCollection -Count 0; broad "falsy" → Should-BeFalsy. The negation Should -Not -BeNullOrEmpty similarly splits into Should-NotBeNull / Should-NotBeEmptyString / Should-NotBeWhiteSpaceString.
  4. Collections. Classic Should -Be also compares arrays; the new Should-Be is a value assertion and errors if -Expected is a collection ("You provided a collection to the -Expected parameter"). Use Should-BeCollection to compare arrays. Should -Contain (single-item membership) → Should-ContainCollection. The new command also takes a collection of expected items and checks they are all present, in the right order (1, 2, 3 | Should-ContainCollection @(1, 2)). For exact, whole-collection equality use Should-BeCollection instead.
  5. Pipeline unwrapping. The pipeline unwraps input: a value assertion sees @(1) as 1 and @() as $null, and a typed collection ([int[]]) is re-collected as [object[]]. When the exact value or concrete collection type matters (e.g. Should-HaveType), pass it with -Actual instead of piping.
  6. No Should-* equivalent. Should -Exist and the Should -FileContentMatch* family have no new counterpart. Either keep the classic assertion, or rewrite with PowerShell: Test-Path $p | Should-BeTrue, (Get-Content $p -Raw) | Should-MatchString 're'.
  7. Should -BeIn direction. No Should-BeIn. Reverse the operands: $value | Should -BeIn $collection → $collection | Should-ContainCollection $value (note the actual/expected swap), or keep the classic form.

Step 4 — Verify

Run the suite and confirm it's still green — the new messages differ, but passes must stay passes:

Invoke-Pester -Path ./tests

If a converted assertion newly fails, re-check the gotchas above (most often #2 truthy/falsy, #3 null-or-empty, or #4 collections).

Step 5 — (Optional) Enforce the new style

Once a suite is fully migrated, switch off the classic syntax so it can't creep back:

$config = New-PesterConfiguration
$config.Should.DisableV5 = $true

With this set, any remaining Should -Be throws and points at the Should-Be form.

Output

Summarize what changed: files touched, count of assertions converted, any classic assertions intentionally left (e.g. Should -Exist), and any conversions that need a human decision (truthy/falsy, null-or-empty, collection semantics).

Reference

  • references/assertion-map.md — full operator-by-operator table with before/after examples and workarounds.
  • Live command reference: https://pester.dev/docs/commands/Should-Be (swap in any Should-* name) for exact parameters and examples.
  • Concepts: https://pester.dev/docs/assertions/should-command (value vs. collection assertions, pipeline vs. -Actual).
  • v5→v6 upgrade guide: https://pester.dev/docs/migrations/v5-to-v6.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.

  • Get oriented in an unfamiliar codebase
  • Prepare documentation for a project handover
  • Compare documented architecture with implementation
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.

  • Assessing a repository’s readiness for AI agents
  • Prioritizing improvements from assessment results
  • Reviewing scores under an organization’s own policy
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.

  • Create project instructions for VS Code Copilot
  • Refresh agent rules after project changes
  • Split monorepo instructions by project area
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.

  • Set shared readiness standards across an organization
  • Focus assessments on AI tooling
  • Adjust the importance of individual checks
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.

  • Identify ads and keywords to pause
  • Find campaigns and audiences worth scaling
  • Assess whether A/B test results are meaningful
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.

  • Add beginner-friendly explanations to existing code
  • Document the reasoning behind syntax and design choices
  • Adjust comment depth for readers with different experience
github/awesome-copilot40.2KUpdated Oct 17, 2026

See all skills by github

Report a problem with this skill