Set up Phoenix tracing for LLM applications in Python or TypeScript. The skill guides automatic and custom recording of individual operations, conversation grouping, metadata, feedback, and production settings such as batching and personal data masking.
OpenInference semantic conventions and instrumentation for Phoenix AI observability. Use when implementing LLM tracing, creating custom spans, or deploying to production.
Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Comprehensive guide for instrumenting LLM applications with OpenInference tracing in Phoenix. Contains reference files covering setup, instrumentation, span types, and production deployment.
Reference these guidelines when:
| Priority | Category | Description | Prefix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Setup | Installation and configuration | setup-* |
| 2 | Instrumentation | Auto and manual tracing | instrumentation-* |
| 3 | Span Types | 9 span kinds with attributes | span-* |
| 4 | Organization | Projects and sessions | projects-*, sessions-* |
| 5 | Enrichment | Custom metadata | metadata-* |
| 6 | Production | Batch processing, masking | production-* |
| 7 | Feedback | Annotations and evaluation | annotations-* |
Navigation Patterns:
# By category prefix
references/setup-* # Installation and configuration
references/instrumentation-* # Auto and manual tracing
references/span-* # Span type specifications
references/sessions-* # Session tracking
references/production-* # Production deployment
references/fundamentals-* # Core concepts
references/attributes-* # Attribute specifications
# By language
references/*-python.md # Python implementations
references/*-typescript.md # TypeScript implementations
Reading Order:
Phoenix Documentation:
Python API Documentation:
arize-phoenix-otel API referencearize-phoenix-client API referenceTypeScript API Documentation:
@arizeai/phoenix-otel, @arizeai/phoenix-client, and other TypeScript packagesNo reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Map an existing codebase into seven documents covering its technology, structure, architecture, conventions, integrations, tests, and concerns. Link findings to file evidence, mark unknowns, and highlight differences between stated plans and the actual implementation.
Assess a repository’s readiness for AI agents with AgentRC and generate a standalone HTML dashboard. Review scores across nine areas, see prioritized improvements, and optionally apply scoring policies tailored to an organization.
Generate coding agent instruction files from a project's actual code using AgentRC. Capture detected languages, frameworks, and conventions in one shared file or split rules by topic and project area, with a preview before writing.
Customize AgentRC readiness assessments to match team or organization standards. Choose or create policies that adjust check importance, disable irrelevant checks, set pass thresholds, and define requirements for automated checks in CI workflows.
Analyze supplied ad performance data to identify wasted spend, strong campaigns, and next tests. Compare channels, assess whether test differences are meaningful, and produce budget reallocation recommendations with a prioritized action plan.
Turn code files into learning resources by adding comments that explain syntax, programming concepts, and design choices. Adjust explanation depth and repetition to the reader’s knowledge while preserving file structure, encoding, and syntax.