Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

competitive-pricing-intel

Monitor competitor pricing pages via live web scrape and Web Archive snapshots. Track plan changes, tier restructuring, new pricing models, and feature gating shifts. Produces a pricing comparison matrix and flags when a competitor changes packaging. Use when a product marketing team needs to stay current on competitive pricing or when preparing for a pricing change of their own.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md8.8 KB
  • skill.meta.json280 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Competitive Pricing Intel

Track competitor pricing pages over time. Detect when they change plans, shift feature gating, adjust pricing models, or introduce new tiers. The output is a living pricing comparison matrix plus alerts when something changes.

Core principle: Pricing is the most under-monitored competitive signal. Most teams only check competitor pricing when they're about to change their own. This skill makes it continuous.

When to Use

  • "What are our competitors charging?"
  • "Has [competitor] changed their pricing recently?"
  • "Build a pricing comparison matrix"
  • "Monitor competitor pricing for changes"
  • "We're rethinking our pricing — show me the competitive landscape"

Phase 0: Intake

  1. Your product name + pricing page URL
  2. Competitors to track — Names + pricing page URLs (2-5 recommended)
  3. Your pricing model — How do you charge? (per seat, usage, flat, freemium, etc.)
  4. Key comparison dimensions — What matters to your buyer? (price per seat, included features, limits, support tiers)
  5. First run or recurring?
    • First run: Full baseline capture + historical analysis
    • Recurring: Compare against last snapshot

Phase 1: Current Pricing Capture

1A: Live Scrape

For each competitor's pricing page:

Fetch: [competitor pricing URL]

Extract:

  • Plan names and prices — Every tier with monthly and annual pricing
  • Feature matrix — What's included in each tier?
  • Limits — Usage caps, seat limits, storage, API calls
  • Add-ons — What costs extra beyond base plans?
  • Enterprise tier — "Contact us" or listed price? What's gated behind sales?
  • Free tier / trial — What's available without paying?
  • Pricing model — Per seat / per user / usage-based / flat / hybrid

1B: Web Archive Historical Check

Search for past versions of their pricing page:

Search: "web.archive.org" "[competitor pricing URL]"
Fetch: web.archive.org/web/*/[competitor pricing URL]

Look for the last 2-3 snapshots to detect:

  • Price increases/decreases
  • Plan restructuring (new tiers added, tiers removed)
  • Feature gating changes (features moved between tiers)
  • Model shifts (e.g., moved from per-seat to usage-based)
  • Free tier changes (expanded or restricted)

1C: Pricing Announcement Research

Search: "[competitor]" pricing change OR "new pricing" OR "updated plans"
Search: "[competitor]" blog pricing OR announcement plans
Search: "[competitor]" site:reddit.com pricing OR "price increase"

Capture any public announcements or community reactions to pricing changes.

Phase 2: Pricing Analysis

2A: Competitive Pricing Matrix

Build a normalized comparison across all competitors:

DimensionYour ProductCompetitor ACompetitor BCompetitor C
Starter price$X/mo$X/mo$X/mo$X/mo
Mid-tier price$X/mo$X/mo$X/mo$X/mo
Enterprise$X/mo or Custom.........
Pricing model[Model][Model][Model][Model]
Free tier[Yes/No + limits].........
Annual discount[X%].........
Key limit (starter)[e.g., 5 seats].........
Key limit (mid)[e.g., 20 seats].........
Overage cost[$/unit or blocked].........
Support included[Email/chat/phone].........

2B: Price-to-Value Ratio

For the ICP's typical use case, calculate effective cost:

Scenario: [Typical ICP — e.g., "10-person growth team, 5,000 contacts, 1,000 emails/month"]

Your Product: $[X]/mo for this scenario
Competitor A: $[X]/mo for this scenario
Competitor B: $[X]/mo for this scenario

This reveals true competitive pricing position, not just list price.

2C: Packaging Strategy Analysis

For each competitor, identify their packaging strategy:

StrategyDescriptionWho Uses It
Good-Better-Best3 tiers, clear upgrade pathMost SaaS
Usage-basedPay for what you useAPI/infrastructure
Per-seatPrice scales with teamCollaboration tools
FreemiumFree forever, premium featuresPLG products
Reverse trialFull features free, then downgradeConversion-optimized
Platform + add-onsBase platform + modular featuresEnterprise

2D: Change Detection (Recurring Runs)

Compare current snapshot against previous:

Change TypeSeverityExample
Price increaseHighStarter: $29 → $39/mo
Price decreaseHighAggressive competitive move
New tier addedMedium"Growth" plan between Starter and Pro
Tier removedMediumSimplified from 4 to 3 plans
Feature ungatedMediumFeature moved from Pro to Starter
Feature gatedMediumFeature moved from Starter to Pro
Model changeCriticalShifted from per-seat to usage-based
Free tier changeHighFree plan limits reduced/expanded

Phase 3: Output Format

# Competitive Pricing Intel — [DATE]
Products tracked: [your product], [competitors]
Previous snapshot: [date or "first run"]

---

## Pricing Change Alerts

### [Competitor Name]
- **Change detected:** [Description of what changed]
- **Previous:** [Old pricing/plan structure]
- **Current:** [New pricing/plan structure]
- **Implication for us:** [What this means for your positioning/pricing]

*(Repeat for each competitor with changes. If no changes: "No pricing changes detected since [last run date].")*

---

## Competitive Pricing Matrix

| | [You] | [Comp A] | [Comp B] | [Comp C] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **Starter** | $[X]/mo | $[X]/mo | $[X]/mo | $[X]/mo |
| **Mid-tier** | $[X]/mo | $[X]/mo | $[X]/mo | $[X]/mo |
| **Enterprise** | [Price] | [Price] | [Price] | [Price] |
| **Model** | [Type] | [Type] | [Type] | [Type] |
| **Free tier** | [Details] | [Details] | [Details] | [Details] |
| **Annual discount** | [X%] | [X%] | [X%] | [X%] |

---

## ICP Scenario Pricing

For: [Typical buyer scenario]

| Product | Monthly Cost | Annual Cost | Notes |
|---------|-------------|-------------|-------|
| [You] | $[X] | $[X] | [Context] |
| [Comp A] | $[X] | $[X] | [Context — e.g., "requires add-on for [feature]"] |
| [Comp B] | $[X] | $[X] | [Context] |

**Your position:** [Cheapest / Mid-range / Premium] for this scenario

---

## Feature Gating Comparison

Features that matter most to ICP — where are they gated?

| Feature | [You] | [Comp A] | [Comp B] |
|---------|-------|----------|----------|
| [Feature 1] | [Tier] | [Tier] | [Tier] |
| [Feature 2] | [Tier] | [Tier] | [Tier] |
| [Feature 3] | [Tier] | [Tier] | [Tier] |

---

## Packaging Strategy Summary

| Competitor | Strategy | Target Motion | Notes |
|-----------|----------|--------------|-------|
| [Comp A] | [Strategy type] | [PLG/Sales-led/Hybrid] | [Key observation] |
| [Comp B] | [Strategy type] | [Motion] | [Observation] |

---

## Pricing Recommendations

Based on competitive analysis:

### If holding current pricing:
- **Strength:** [Where your pricing wins]
- **Vulnerability:** [Where a competitor undercuts you]
- **Messaging guidance:** [How to position price on sales calls]

### If considering a change:
- **Opportunity:** [Gap in market you could fill — e.g., "no one offers usage-based in this category"]
- **Risk:** [What to watch out for — e.g., "Competitor B is already cheaper at scale"]

Save to pricing-comparison-[YYYY-MM-DD].md in the current working directory.

Scheduling

Run monthly (pricing changes are infrequent but impactful):

0 8 1 * * python3 run_skill.py competitive-pricing-intel --client <client-name>

Cost

ComponentCost
Web scraping (pricing pages)Free
Web Archive lookupsFree
Web search (announcements)Free
Analysis and comparisonFree (LLM reasoning)
TotalFree

Tools Required

  • web_search — for pricing announcements and community reactions
  • fetch_webpage — for scraping current pricing pages
  • No API keys required

Trigger Phrases

  • "What are competitors charging?"
  • "Has [competitor] changed their pricing?"
  • "Build a pricing comparison matrix"
  • "Run competitive pricing intel for [client]"
  • "Monitor competitor pricing pages"

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Research supported advertising promises from a specific buyer's context, current product facts, customer language and observed ads. Turn them into static, video or copy ideas; match video ideas to actual recipes and save a product-scoped angle bank for write-video-ad-script. Product-led discovery can use verified facts without reviews. Reference persistence and reach are observations, not proof of performance.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Analyze ad campaign performance data (Google, Meta, LinkedIn) to identify what's working, what's wasting budget, and specific cut/scale/test recommendations. Runs statistical analysis, funnel diagnostics, and multi-channel budget reallocation with specific dollar-amount shift recommendations and scenario modeling.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

For paid lead-gen and participant-recruitment ads, replaces vanity CPA with true CAC per qualified lead by joining ad-platform data with downstream funnel events, surfaces tracking gaps, and classifies every creative into Scale / Keep / Investigate / Cut.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

The intake stage of a Meta ad harness. Researches the brand first, states what it assumes, and asks only what it cannot infer and what would change money, claims or legal exposure if guessed wrong — at most four questions a turn, in plain business language. Writes the brand's stable facts (ads/brand.md), the campaign brief, and a log of what was asked vs assumed. Use it when someone wants to run Meta ads and the brand's ad facts are not yet recorded.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Checks paid ads against the ad platform's rules (Meta, TikTok, Google, LinkedIn and others) and the brand's category rules: the copy, on-image or on-screen text, pictures and people. Rewrites what can be fixed honestly, adds the disclosures that are needed, and flags anything that needs a human or legal review, with one pass, fixed or flag line per ad and platform. Use alone when you already have the ad text or images and know where they will run; otherwise run the playbook for the job (e.g. make-static-ads, make-content, email-lifecycle).

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Analyze the message match between your ads and landing pages. Checks if the promise in the ad copy carries through to the landing page headline, body, and CTA. Flags disconnects that kill conversion rates. Works with Google, Meta, and LinkedIn ads.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills1.3KUpdated Oct 23, 2026

See all skills by gooseworks-ai

Report a problem with this skill