Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

codexkit-risk-register

Build and maintain a project Risk Register per PMBOK 8 Risk Performance Domain. Identify risks, assess probability and impact, define response strategies, and track residual risk. Use throughout the project lifecycle — not just at planning. Do not use for operational incident response or security vulnerability scanning.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md4.3 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml167 B

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Risk Register Manager

Purpose

Systematically identify, assess, and manage project risks using a structured register with probability/impact scoring and defined response strategies.

When to use

  • project kick-off to establish the initial risk baseline
  • sprint or milestone reviews to update and add emerging risks
  • before major decisions to assess risk exposure
  • when stakeholders request a risk assessment report

When not to use

  • live incident response or post-mortem analysis
  • security vulnerability scanning (use security tools)
  • personal task risk assessment

Inputs

  • project scope, objectives, and constraints
  • project type (predictive / adaptive / hybrid)
  • stakeholder list and their risk tolerance
  • known assumptions and dependencies
  • lessons learned from similar projects (if available)

Procedure

  1. Identify risks using multiple sources:
    • Internal: technical complexity, resource gaps, schedule pressure, budget
    • External: market shifts, regulatory changes, vendor reliability, geopolitical
    • PMBOK 8 emphasis: sustainability risks (ESG, climate, social impact)
    • Techniques: brainstorming, PESTLE analysis, Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS)
  2. Assess each risk qualitatively:
    • Probability: Very Low (0.1) / Low (0.3) / Medium (0.5) / High (0.7) / Very High (0.9)
    • Impact: Very Low (0.05) / Low (0.1) / Medium (0.2) / High (0.4) / Very High (0.8)
    • Risk Score = Probability × Impact
    • Red zone (≥ 0.25): immediate response required
    • Yellow zone: response plan needed
    • Green zone: monitor only
  3. Define response strategy:
    • For threats: Avoid / Transfer / Mitigate / Accept (active or passive)
    • For opportunities: Exploit / Share / Enhance / Accept
  4. Assign ownership — every risk has one named owner.
  5. Track residual risk — after response, re-score to verify reduction.
  6. SAFe integration — for SAFe teams, use ROAM board:
    • R = Resolved | O = Owned | A = Accepted | M = Mitigated

Output

  • risk register table: ID | Category | Description | Trigger | Probability | Impact | Score | Owner | Response Strategy | Residual Risk | Status
  • risk heat map summary (red/yellow/green distribution)
  • top 10 risks with detailed response plans
  • escalation list for sponsor or steering committee
  • risk trend over time (risk burn-down if tracked across sprints)

Definition of done

  • every identified risk has a probability, impact, and score
  • every red/yellow risk has a named owner and defined response strategy
  • residual risk is assessed for all mitigated risks
  • register is reviewable by stakeholders

Examples

  • "Build an initial risk register for a 6-month ERP migration project."
  • "Update the risk register after Sprint 5 — add 3 new risks we discovered."
  • "We have 15 risks but no response plans. Help me define strategies for the top 10."

Quality Criteria

  • All dependencies and prerequisites are documented
  • Changes are reversible or include a rollback plan
  • Security implications are assessed for each configuration change
  • Monitoring and alerting are defined for post-deployment validation

Verification (4C)

CheckQuestion
CorrectnessAre all configurations, permissions, and dependencies accurate?
CompletenessDoes the setup cover dev, staging, and prod environments as needed?
Context-fitIs the solution proportional to the problem (not over/under-engineered)?
ConsequenceIf deployed as-is to production, what is the highest-risk failure mode?

Edge Cases

  • Target environment has pre-existing configuration — Scan for conflicts before applying changes. Document what to preserve.
  • Permissions differ between environments — Test in staging first. Document the minimum permissions required.
  • Third-party service is unavailable or deprecated — Document fallback or alternative. Include health-check endpoints.

Changelog

  • v1.0.0 — Initial release

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Design rigorous A/B test plans with hypothesis, sample size calculation, Minimum Detectable Effect (MDE), randomization strategy, and decision rules. Includes guardrail metrics and rollout playbook. Use when planning product experiments, conversion optimization, or data-driven feature decisions.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hoavdc/CodexKit25Updated Oct 11, 2026

Review REST and GraphQL API designs for consistency, usability, and best practices. Covers naming conventions, versioning strategy, error format, pagination, authentication patterns, and breaking change detection. Use when reviewing API specs, designing new APIs, or auditing existing endpoints.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hoavdc/CodexKit25Updated Oct 11, 2026

Write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following the Michael Nygard format. Captures context, options considered, decision rationale, and consequences. Use when making technology choices, framework selections, or any architectural decision that future developers need to understand.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hoavdc/CodexKit25Updated Oct 11, 2026

Assess organizational readiness for financial audits (internal or external). Map assertions to account balances, check evidence completeness, score readiness using a Red/Amber/Green framework, and generate a remediation timeline. Aligned with SOX, IFRS, and GAAP audit standards. Use before scheduled audits or when preparing for first-time compliance.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hoavdc/CodexKit25Updated Oct 11, 2026

Design safe recurring Codex automations with clear prompts, outputs, schedules, and gating rules.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hoavdc/CodexKit25Updated Oct 11, 2026

Refine Product Backlog Items to meet INVEST criteria. Write User Stories with Acceptance Criteria in Given/When/Then format, estimate with Story Points, and flag dependencies. Use before sprint planning when backlog items need grooming. Do not use to prioritize the backlog — that is the Product Owner's decision.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hoavdc/CodexKit25Updated Oct 11, 2026

See all skills by hoavdc

Report a problem with this skill