Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

opsec-discipline

Use when about to take any outward or offensive action (request, payload, persistence, lateral movement, exfil, or feeding captured traffic to the model) — to decide detection footprint, cleanup, and secret redaction first

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.2 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

OPSEC Discipline

Overview

Decide the detection footprint and cleanup before acting, not after. Every offensive technique in this repo pairs with the telemetry it generates and a detection signature — use that pairing to choose the quieter path and to know what you'll need to clean up.

Before acting, answer three questions

  1. Detection — what telemetry does this generate? Which Sigma/EDR rule would catch it? (Each domain skill's OPSEC & Detection table has this.) Pick the lower-noise variant when one exists.
  2. Cleanup — what does this touch (files, registry, services, accounts, tickets)? How is it reverted? Stage the cleanup before you create the artifact.
  3. Secret hygiene — any captured traffic / output that reaches the model or the report must be redacted at the boundary: python skills/coding-mastery/scripts/_lib/redact_headers.py < exchange.txt (or redact_text()), so Authorization/Cookie/API-key/JWT values never land in context or the report.

Red Flags — STOP, decide OPSEC first

  • "I'll worry about cleanup after I'm in" (you won't; decide now)
  • "Just paste the raw request/response" (redact secrets at the boundary first)
  • "Loudest exploit is fine, it works" (pick the variant with the smaller footprint)
  • "Persistence now, document later" (persistence on un-authorized hosts is out — see scope-discipline)
  • "The token's only in a log" (a logged secret is a leaked secret — mask it)

Rationalizations

ExcuseReality
"OPSEC slows me down"Unplanned noise/loot is how engagements get burned and how data leaks.
"It's an internal tool log"Logs get shipped, shared, and indexed. Redact.
"Cleanup is a reporting-phase task"You can't clean what you didn't track. Track at action time.

OPSEC is part of every action, not a phase. Detection-awareness also strengthens the defensive value of the finding (you can tell the client exactly how to catch it).

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when attacking a Windows Active Directory domain — Kerberos roasting/delegation, coercion + NTLM/Kerberos relay (CVE-2025-33073), ADCS ESC1-16 (EKUwu), ticket forgery & DCSync, dMSA BadSuccessor (CVE-2025-53779), BloodHound attack-path enumeration, domain dominance

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude395Updated Oct 22, 2026

Use when red-teaming an agentic AI / LLM application — indirect & zero-click prompt injection, MCP tool poisoning, persistent memory poisoning, excessive-agency tool abuse, multi-turn jailbreaks, PyRIT/Garak/Promptfoo harnesses

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude395Updated Oct 22, 2026

Use when attacking an AI/ML system or model — prompt injection & jailbreaks (Crescendo, Skeleton Key, Best-of-N), RAG/vector poisoning, agentic/MCP exploitation (CVE-2025-54136), ML supply-chain RCE (pickle CVE-2025-32434), model extraction / membership inference / adversarial suffixes (GCG)

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude395Updated Oct 22, 2026

Use when building a client-side browser exploit — V8/JSC JIT type confusion to renderer R/W, V8 heap-sandbox escape, renderer-to-browser sandbox escape (Mojo IPC, GPU/Dawn/ANGLE), Electron/webview IPC abuse, 1-click RCE chains

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude395Updated Oct 22, 2026

Use when attacking or auditing a CI/CD pipeline or software supply chain — pwn requests, poisoned pipeline execution, compromised/mutable-tag actions, dependency confusion, registry worms, runner backdoors, OIDC trust abuse, SLSA/provenance

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude395Updated Oct 22, 2026

Use when attacking AWS/Azure/GCP cloud — IAM/identity privilege escalation, IMDS/metadata SSRF, Entra device-code & PRT theft, GCP impersonation chains, Kubernetes/container escape, IaC/CI-CD federation abuse

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude395Updated Oct 22, 2026

See all skills by hypnguyen1209

Report a problem with this skill