Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

nw-post-mortem-framework

Blameless post-mortem structure, incident timeline reconstruction, response evaluation, and organizational learning

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Post-Mortem Framework

Principles

  • Blameless: focus on systems/processes, not individuals. People make reasonable decisions given available info.
  • Evidence-based: every finding backed by logs, metrics, or documented actions
  • Action-oriented: every finding produces concrete, assigned action item
  • Learning-focused: capture what worked alongside what failed

Post-Mortem Document Structure

# Post-Mortem: [Incident Title]

**Date**: [incident date]
**Duration**: [start to resolution]
**Severity**: [P0-P3]
**Author**: [analyst]

## Summary
[2-3 sentence overview: what happened, impact, resolution]

## Timeline
| Time | Event | Source |
|------|-------|--------|
| HH:MM | [event] | [log/metric/report] |

## Impact
- Users affected: [number/percentage]
- Duration of impact: [time]
- Business impact: [quantified if possible]
- Systems affected: [list]

## Root Cause Analysis
[5 Whys analysis with evidence at each level]

## Detection and Response
- Time to detect: [duration] -- [how detected]
- Time to respond: [duration] -- [first action]
- Time to mitigate: [duration] -- [mitigation applied]
- Time to resolve: [duration] -- [permanent fix]

## What Went Well
- [positive observations about detection, response, recovery]

## What Could Be Improved
- [areas where detection, response, recovery fell short]

## Action Items
| ID | Action | Owner | Priority | Due Date |
|----|--------|-------|----------|----------|
| 1 | [specific action] | [team/person] | [P0-P3] | [date] |

## Lessons Learned
- [key takeaways for the organization]

Incident Timeline Reconstruction

Sources

  1. Monitoring alerts/dashboards (timestamps) | 2. Deployment logs/CI-CD records
  2. Communication channels (Slack, email, incident) | 4. VCS (commits, merges, deploys) | 5. User reports/support tickets

Quality Checks

Events chronological with verified timestamps | gaps >5 min noted/explained | decision points identified with available info | causal relationships noted

Response Effectiveness Evaluation

Detection

Detected by monitoring or users? | Duration onset-to-detection? | Existing alerts relevant? Missing?

Escalation

Right team at right time? | Procedures followed? | Communication clear to stakeholders?

Resolution

Mitigation effective? | Rollback considered/viable? | Duration mitigation-to-permanent-fix?

Organizational Learning

Knowledge Capture

Document root causes as reusable patterns | update runbooks | share in retrospectives

Process Improvements

Update monitoring/alerting per detection gaps | revise deployment per rollback effectiveness | strengthen testing for failure scenario

Action Item Tracking

Every item has owner + due date | track in standups/sprint reviews | verify effectiveness post-deployment

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave620Updated Sep 16, 2026

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave620Updated Sep 16, 2026

Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave620Updated Sep 16, 2026

Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave620Updated Sep 16, 2026

5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave620Updated Sep 16, 2026

Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave620Updated Sep 16, 2026

See all skills by nWave-ai

Report a problem with this skill