Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

nw-roadmap-review-checks

Roadmap-specific validation checks for architecture reviews. Load when reviewing roadmaps for implementation readiness.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Roadmap Review Checks

Six mandatory checks for every roadmap review. Each produces a finding block.

Check 1: External Validity

Verify completing all steps produces an INVOCABLE feature, not just existing code.

Criteria: at least one step targets entry point integration | acceptance tests invoke through driving ports | clear user invocation path after completion

Severity: BLOCKER if no integration step or invocation path. HIGH if tests at wrong boundary.

EXTERNAL VALIDITY CHECK: PASSED|FAILED

Issue: {missing wiring}
Consequence: {what happens without fix}
Required Action: {integration step to add}

Check 2: AC Implementation Coupling

Scan AC for implementation details locking crafter into predetermined structure.

Detection: underscore-prefixed identifiers | method signatures with params | internal class references | specific return types

Severity: HIGH. Flag each coupled AC with rewrite.

  • Coupled: _install_des_module() copies src/des/
  • Rewritten: DES module importable from installation target after install

Rationale: AC = WHAT (observable behavior), never HOW (internal structure). Crafter decides during GREEN + REFACTOR.

Check 3: Step Decomposition Ratio

Calculation: implementation steps / unique production files in files_to_modify

Thresholds: acceptable <= 2.0 | warning 2.0-2.5 | reject > 2.5

Identical pattern check: 3+ steps with identical AC differing by substitution -> require batching.

Check 4: Implementation Code in Roadmap

Verify no implementation code. BLOCKER.

Detection: code snippets/algorithms in descriptions | method implementations in AC | pseudocode/logic | variable names, loops, conditionals

Architect defines WHAT; crafter decides HOW. Roadmap code prevents better solutions via TDD.

Check 5: Roadmap Concision and Precision

Quantitative thresholds: total words 500 (1-3 steps) / 1500 (4-8) / 3000 (9-15) | step description max 50 words | AC max 5 per step, 30 words each | notes max 100 words

Verbosity detection: multi-sentence blocks -> bullets | qualifiers (comprehensive, robust) -> delete | motivational language -> delete | redundancy -> state once | tutorials -> delete, assume expertise

Precision: every AC single interpretation | testable outcome | business over technical jargon

Severity: BLOCKER if word count exceeds threshold.

Check 6: Unit Test Boundary Validation

Verify unit tests respect hexagonal boundaries.

Rules: invoke through driving ports only | no domain entity unit tests | behavior focus | never import internal/private modules

  • Wrong: Tests verify TemplateValidator._validate_schema() handles edge cases
  • Right: When invalid template provided to render_prompt(), ValidationError raised with clear message

Severity: HIGH.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave622Updated Sep 16, 2026

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave622Updated Sep 16, 2026

Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave622Updated Sep 16, 2026

Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave622Updated Sep 16, 2026

5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave622Updated Sep 16, 2026

Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave622Updated Sep 16, 2026

See all skills by nWave-ai

Report a problem with this skill