Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

nw-test-refactoring-catalog

Detailed refactoring mechanics with step-by-step procedures, and test code smell catalog with detection patterns and before/after examples

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md3.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Test Refactoring Catalog

Test Code Smells (Full Detail)

L1 Readability Smells

Obscure Test

  • Problem: test name does not reveal business scenario being tested
  • Detection: generic names like Test1(), ProcessOrderTest(), or names requiring reading test body to understand
  • Solution: rename to Given_When_Then or should_do_expected_thing_when_condition format
Before: public void Test1() { /* ... */ }
After:  public void ProcessOrder_PremiumCustomer_AppliesCorrectDiscount() { /* ... */ }

Hard-Coded Test Data

  • Problem: magic numbers and strings obscure business rules being tested
  • Detection: numbers like 1000, 0.15, strings without explanation
  • Solution: extract to named constants that reveal business meaning
Before: Assert.Equal(850, result.Total);  // What discount?
After:  const decimal EXPECTED_TOTAL = 1000 * (1 - 0.15m);
        Assert.Equal(EXPECTED_TOTAL, result.Total);

Assertion Roulette

  • Problem: multiple assertions without messages make failures unclear
  • Detection: multiple Assert.* calls without message parameter
  • Solution: add descriptive message to each assertion explaining expected business outcome

L2 Complexity Smells

Eager Test

  • Problem: single test verifies multiple unrelated behaviors
  • Detection: multiple arrange/act/assert cycles or assertions testing different concerns
  • Solution: split into focused tests, one per business scenario
Before: ProcessOrderTest() { /* tests discount AND shipping AND tax */ }
After:  ProcessOrder_AppliesDiscount()
        ProcessOrder_CalculatesShipping()
        ProcessOrder_CalculatesTax()

Prefer parameterized tests for variations of the same behavior.

Test Code Duplication

  • Problem: repeated test setup logic across multiple tests
  • Detection: same object creation, mock setup, or data builders copied in 3+ tests
  • Solution: extract helper methods
Extract: CreatePremiumCustomer(), CreateHighValueOrder()

Conditional Test Logic

  • Problem: if/switch statements in test code make tests non-deterministic
  • Detection: if, switch, for loops in test methods
  • Solution: replace with parameterized tests
# Before: if/else in test
# After:
@pytest.mark.parametrize("input,expected", [...])
def test_behavior(input, expected): ...

L3 Organization Smells

Mystery Guest

  • Problem: test depends on external files or hidden dependencies
  • Detection: File.ReadAllText, database queries, external config in tests
  • Solution: inline test data or make dependency explicit in test setup

Test Class Bloat

  • Problem: single test class contains tests for multiple unrelated concerns
  • Detection: test class with 15+ tests covering different features
  • Solution: split by feature
Before: UserServiceTests (31 tests)
After:  UserAuthTests, UserProfileTests, UserNotificationTests

General Fixture

  • Problem: shared fixture used by tests with different needs
  • Detection: SetUp method creates data used by only some tests
  • Solution: move to per-test setup methods or test-specific fixtures

For production code refactoring techniques and mechanics, load the progressive-refactoring skill.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave622Updated Sep 16, 2026

Review dimensions for validating agent quality - template compliance, safety, testing, and priority validation

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave622Updated Sep 16, 2026

Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave622Updated Sep 16, 2026

Detailed 5-phase workflow for creating agents - from requirements analysis through validation and iterative refinement

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave622Updated Sep 16, 2026

5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave622Updated Sep 16, 2026

Architectural style selection decision matrices, trade-off analysis, structural enforcement rules, and combination patterns. Load when choosing or evaluating architecture styles.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

nWave-ai/nWave622Updated Sep 16, 2026

See all skills by nWave-ai

Report a problem with this skill