Compare estimated AI model costs for a task using its complexity and expected text volume. Get a suitable low-cost recommendation, a cheaper but riskier alternative, and a premium option, with explicit assumptions behind the estimates.
Starter: compare model costs for a described task — maps task shape to the cheapest adequate seat and shows the price spread
Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Answer "which model should I use for this, and what will it cost?" with numbers instead of vibes.
The user describes a task (bulk refactor, deep review, quick lookup, long-context analysis) and wants the cheapest seat that is still adequate.
high effort; only a bounded judgment-class call (ambiguous architecture, API design, product tradeoffs) justifies Fable 5.1 at 10/50 USD per MTok.skills/blocks/fable5-prompting.md).No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Interpret the saved results of a completed AI council review. Count verdicts, check whether enough participants responded and whether models are independent, surface substantive dissent, and explain what action the outcome supports.
Turn a technical choice into a structured debate between different AI model families. Assign explicit positions, launch the discussion, and summarize agreement, disagreement, and a recommendation supported by the strongest argument that survives the debate.
Clarify a feature’s requirements with multiple AI providers, combining technical constraints with user and business needs. Produce a scoped definition covering priorities, edge cases, exclusions, and a requirements checklist before implementation begins.
Review code or documents with available AI providers before delivery. Combine findings into a scored validation report that checks prior requirements and decisions, separates critical issues from warnings, and recommends next steps.
Develop complex features or business documents by gathering approaches from available AI providers. Combine their perspectives with prior project decisions and quality checks to produce a proposed plan, then proceed with implementation after user confirmation.
Research technical or business questions through multiple available AI providers, each assigned a different perspective. Combine usable results into a report covering findings, disagreements, evidence gaps, priorities, and recommended next steps.