Create a product requirements document for a new feature or product. Clarify users, problems, goals, and constraints, then organize prioritized requirements, acceptance criteria, implementation phases, and risks into a structured document for AI-assisted development.
Write an AI-optimized PRD using multi-AI orchestration — use when scoping a new feature or product
Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Host: Codex CLI — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex. Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than
/octo:*slash commands. Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it. For host tool equivalents, seeskills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md.
DO NOT call Skill() again. DO NOT load any more skills. Execute directly.
Before writing ANY PRD content, you MUST ask the user these questions:
I need to understand your requirements before creating the PRD.
1. **Target Users**: Who will use this? (developers, end-users, admins, etc.)
2. **Core Problem**: What specific pain point does this solve? Any metrics?
3. **Success Criteria**: How will you measure if this succeeds?
4. **Constraints**: Any technical, budget, or timeline constraints?
5. **Existing Context**: Is this greenfield or integrating with existing systems?
Please answer these (even briefly) so I can create a more targeted PRD.
WAIT for user response before proceeding to Phase 1.
If user says "skip" or provides the feature description inline, extract what you can and note assumptions.
Only search if topic is unfamiliar. Limit to 2 web searches max:
Do NOT over-research. 60 seconds max for this phase.
Structure:
After drafting the PRD but BEFORE self-scoring, dispatch the draft to a second provider for adversarial review. A single-model PRD has blind spots — cross-provider challenge surfaces wrong assumptions, uncovered scenarios, and contradictory requirements.
Dispatch the PRD draft to a different provider (Codex, Antigravity, or Sonnet as fallback) with this prompt:
"Challenge this PRD. What assumptions are wrong? What user scenarios are missing? What requirements contradict each other? What will the first user complaint be? What risk does this PRD ignore?"
After receiving the challenge:
Adversarial review: appliedSkip with --fast or when user requests speed over thoroughness. See prd.md command for full dispatch syntax.
Score against 100-point framework:
Write to user-specified filename or generate based on feature name.
START WITH PHASE 0 CLARIFICATION QUESTIONS NOW.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Interpret the saved results of a completed AI council review. Count verdicts, check whether enough participants responded and whether models are independent, surface substantive dissent, and explain what action the outcome supports.
Turn a technical choice into a structured debate between different AI model families. Assign explicit positions, launch the discussion, and summarize agreement, disagreement, and a recommendation supported by the strongest argument that survives the debate.
Clarify a feature’s requirements with multiple AI providers, combining technical constraints with user and business needs. Produce a scoped definition covering priorities, edge cases, exclusions, and a requirements checklist before implementation begins.
Review code or documents with available AI providers before delivery. Combine findings into a scored validation report that checks prior requirements and decisions, separates critical issues from warnings, and recommends next steps.
Develop complex features or business documents by gathering approaches from available AI providers. Combine their perspectives with prior project decisions and quality checks to produce a proposed plan, then proceed with implementation after user confirmation.
Research technical or business questions through multiple available AI providers, each assigned a different perspective. Combine usable results into a report covering findings, disagreements, evidence gaps, priorities, and recommended next steps.