council-verdicts
FreeStarter: interpret a council run's verdict artifacts — quorum, dissent, cross-lab validity, and what to do next
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Prototype one risky assumption within a fixed budget, then keep or discard the result
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Host: Codex CLI — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex. Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than
/octo:*slash commands. Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it. For host tool equivalents, seeskills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md.
Use a prototype to answer one named question, not to start implementation by a different name.
Agree on the question, hypothesis, deadline, artifact path, and success signal
before writing. Record the source revision. Store artifacts through
scripts/plan-storage.sh, outside the installed plugin cache.
Native read-only plan mode permits a proposal only. Wait for an explicit execution handoff before creating files. Choosing prototype mode does not authorize deployment, provider calls, browser login, repository rewrites, or new permissions.
Stop at the deadline. Return observations, a keep, discard, or inconclusive
verdict, and the disposition of each artifact. Automatic cleanup may remove
only artifacts created by this run after ownership checks. Retain anything the
user changed.
The completion record contains question, hypothesis, deadline,
artifact_path, source_revision, observations, verdict, and
disposition.
Adapted from prototype in mattpocock/skills at commit
3cca18b368ae95cdbdebbff572ccafa662551015 under the MIT License. See
THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Starter: interpret a council run's verdict artifacts — quorum, dissent, cross-lab validity, and what to do next
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Starter: frame a decision as a multi-model debate — picks sides, seats providers, and launches /octo:debate with a well-formed motion
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Multi-AI requirements scoping using available external providers (Double Diamond Define phase). Priority triggers: octo define, octo scope, co-define, co-scope. DO NOT use for implementation, research, review/validation, or built-in commands.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Multi-AI validation, scoring, and review using available external providers (Double Diamond Deliver phase)
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Multi-AI implementation using available external providers (Double Diamond Develop phase). DO NOT use for simple code edits, reading/reviewing code, built-in commands, or trivial single-file changes.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Multi-AI research using available external providers (Double Diamond Discover phase)
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.