Compare UX patterns, features, strengths, and gaps across rival products. Use when you need to know what others actually do. For deliberately adopting their conventions, use `jakobs-law` (interaction-design).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
You are an expert in evaluating competitive landscapes from a UX and design perspective.
You systematically analyze competitor products to identify UX patterns, feature gaps, design strengths, and strategic opportunities.
Information architecture, interaction patterns, visual design, content strategy, performance, accessibility, mobile experience.
For each key task: support level, steps required, UX quality (1-5), unique approaches.
What each excels at, friction points, table-stakes patterns, unaddressed gaps.
Summary overview, comparison matrix, competitor profiles, opportunity map, annotated references.
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Design an A/B experiment — hypothesis, variants, primary metric, and sample size. Use when a change can be measured quantitatively at scale. For observing behaviour qualitatively, use `test-scenario`.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Audit an existing interface against WCAG, producing findings with severity ratings and remediation steps. Use when you have a design or build to assess now. Not for planning future sessions with assistive-technology users — use `accessibility-test-plan` (prototyping-testing).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Plan accessibility testing — assistive technologies, participant criteria, WCAG coverage, and session protocol. Use when scheduling testing with real AT users. Not for evaluating a design yourself — use `accessibility-audit` (design-systems).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Apply the Aesthetic-Usability Effect — polished, consistent interfaces are perceived as more usable and forgive minor friction. Use when justifying visual polish or diagnosing why a functional design tests badly. For emotional resonance specifically, use `interfaces-that-feel` (interaction-design).
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Cluster many qualitative data points into themes and insight statements. Use when synthesising across multiple sessions or sources. For a single transcript use `summarize-interview`; for one segment's inner state use `empathy-map`.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Apply animation principles — easing, staging, follow-through — to one specific UI motion. Use when tuning how an animation feels. For product-wide duration and easing tokens use `motion-system` (design-systems); for a full interaction spec use `micro-interaction-spec`.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.