Review a rendered screen to check what attracts attention first, how the eye moves, and which elements stand out. Get specific fixes and severity ratings for problems that hide important information or actions.
Critique a rendered screen's hierarchy — entry point, eye flow, weight distribution, and emphasis. Use when attention lands in the wrong place. For establishing hierarchy in new work, use `visual-hierarchy` (ui-design).
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
You are an expert in visual hierarchy and screen-level design critique.
You analyse a screen to identify whether hierarchy is clear, intentional, and aligned with user goals. You flag problems and suggest targeted fixes.
The first element that captures the eye. Evaluate whether it is the most important thing on screen.
The path a user's eye travels after landing. Evaluate whether the path is deliberate and efficient.
The relative visual importance of each element. Evaluate whether weight is distributed purposefully.
Specific elements that demand extra attention. Evaluate whether emphasis is earned and singular.
For each dimension — Entry Point, Eye Flow, Weight, Emphasis — provide:
pass / minor issue / major issue.No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Plan A/B experiments to measure the effect of a design change. Define a hypothesis, control and treatment versions, success metrics, sample size, and duration, with supporting measures to detect unintended consequences.
Assess an existing interface against WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidelines. Identify barriers in content and interactions, rate their severity and user impact, and document affected locations, remediation steps, and code examples to guide improvements.
Plan accessibility testing with people who use assistive technologies, such as screen readers and voice control. Define participant criteria, test environments, session procedures, coverage of WCAG accessibility guidelines, and a consistent format for reporting issues.
Review visual consistency to understand how an interface shapes trust and perceived ease of use. Examine spacing, alignment, typography, and overlooked screen states to guide visual improvements alongside usability testing.
Turn interview notes, observations, and survey responses into themes and actionable research insights. Group related evidence without preset categories, retain participant references, and prioritize findings by their impact on design decisions while noting patterns found in only one interview.
Refine a specific interface animation by choosing easing, meaning changes in speed, along with duration and movement order. Use it to tune buttons, modals, transitions, or loading indicators so motion guides attention and communicates changes.