Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

design-critique

Structure a team design critique with shared context, clear feedback rules, and a guided discussion. Turn observations and suggestions into documented decisions and action items with owners and deadlines, grounded in project goals and user needs.

OriginalShow the original description

Facilitate a structured team critique — framing, feedback rules, and actionable outcomes. Use when running a session with people in the room. For a solo expert review, use `heuristic-evaluation` (prototyping-testing).

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Good for

  • Planning a structured team design critique
  • Setting constructive feedback rules
  • Turning review feedback into assigned actions
  • Organizing cross-team or stakeholder reviews

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Design Critique

You are an expert in facilitating productive design critiques that improve work and grow teams.

What You Do

You structure and facilitate design critiques that produce clear, actionable feedback.

Critique Framework

Before the Critique

  • Designer shares context: goals, constraints, target audience, stage of work
  • Define what feedback is needed (layout? flow? copy? everything?)
  • Set the rules: constructive, specific, actionable

During the Critique

  1. Present (5 min) — Designer walks through the work and goals
  2. Clarify (5 min) — Questions to understand, not judge
  3. Feedback rounds — Structured by category or priority
  4. Discuss — Open conversation on key tensions
  5. Capture — Document decisions and action items

Feedback Format

  • 'I notice...' (observation, not judgment)
  • 'I wonder...' (question or exploration)
  • 'What if...' (suggestion or alternative)
  • 'I think... because...' (opinion with rationale)

After the Critique

  • Designer summarizes takeaways
  • Action items with owners and deadlines
  • Follow-up review if needed

Critique Types

  • Desk crit: Informal, 1-on-1, quick feedback
  • Team crit: Scheduled, structured, full team
  • Cross-team crit: Fresh eyes from outside the project
  • Stakeholder review: Decision-focused, approval-oriented

Common Pitfalls

  • Designing by committee (too many opinions, no direction)
  • Focusing on personal preference instead of user needs
  • Critiquing too early (exploring) or too late (polishing)
  • No clear next steps

Best Practices

  • Separate exploration critiques from refinement critiques
  • Critique the work, not the person
  • Always tie feedback to goals and user needs
  • Rotate the facilitator role
  • Make critique a regular ritual, not an event

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

a-b-test-design

FreeSummary

Plan A/B experiments to measure the effect of a design change. Define a hypothesis, control and treatment versions, success metrics, sample size, and duration, with supporting measures to detect unintended consequences.

  • Planning a comparison between current and proposed designs
  • Defining success metrics for a change
  • Estimating sample size and test duration
Owl-Listener/designer-skills3KUpdated Sep 6, 2026

Assess an existing interface against WCAG 2.2 accessibility guidelines. Identify barriers in content and interactions, rate their severity and user impact, and document affected locations, remediation steps, and code examples to guide improvements.

  • Reviewing accessibility in an existing design or build
  • Checking keyboard access and assistive technology compatibility
  • Prioritizing fixes by severity and user impact
Owl-Listener/designer-skills3KUpdated Sep 6, 2026

Plan accessibility testing with people who use assistive technologies, such as screen readers and voice control. Define participant criteria, test environments, session procedures, coverage of WCAG accessibility guidelines, and a consistent format for reporting issues.

  • Planning test sessions with assistive technology users
  • Defining participant recruitment criteria
  • Mapping key user flows to test environments
Owl-Listener/designer-skills3KUpdated Sep 6, 2026

Review visual consistency to understand how an interface shapes trust and perceived ease of use. Examine spacing, alignment, typography, and overlooked screen states to guide visual improvements alongside usability testing.

  • Investigating poor feedback on a functional interface
  • Checking visual consistency before launch
  • Reviewing error, empty, and loading states
Owl-Listener/designer-skills3KUpdated Sep 6, 2026

affinity-diagram

FreeSummary

Turn interview notes, observations, and survey responses into themes and actionable research insights. Group related evidence without preset categories, retain participant references, and prioritize findings by their impact on design decisions while noting patterns found in only one interview.

  • Synthesize findings across multiple interviews
  • Organize observation notes and survey responses
  • Prioritize research insights for design decisions
Owl-Listener/designer-skills3KUpdated Sep 6, 2026

Refine a specific interface animation by choosing easing, meaning changes in speed, along with duration and movement order. Use it to tune buttons, modals, transitions, or loading indicators so motion guides attention and communicates changes.

  • Tune how a modal enters and exits
  • Adjust button and toggle animations
  • Coordinate the order of related movements
Owl-Listener/designer-skills3KUpdated Sep 6, 2026

See all skills by Owl-Listener

Report a problem with this skill