Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

ai-work-assetization-diagnoser

AI 工作资产化诊断器 / Assetization Router:当用户提供 AI 协作会话、重复任务、prompt、工作流描述、 团队 AI 使用场景或一次成功交付过程,并要求判断应该沉淀成 Prompt、Context Pack、Workflow、Skill、 Loop、System,或根本不值得沉淀时使用。

它只做诊断、分层和下一步资产建议,不替代具体 Skill 创建、 PRD 起草、调研、实现或自动化执行。不用于普通事实查询、一次性文案、trace 根因分析或高责任专业判断。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (4)

  • SKILL.md6.8 KB
  • evals/evals.json2.8 KB
  • references/asset-layer-rubric.md1.2 KB
  • scripts/check_assetization_report.py1.0 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

AI 工作资产化诊断器

中文速查

  • 中文名:AI 工作资产化诊断器 / 资产化路由器
  • 英文稳定名:ai-work-assetization-diagnoser
  • 分类:Skill/Agent 治理
  • 你可以这样叫我:这段工作是不是值得做成 Skill、这个 prompt 应该沉淀成 workflow 还是 Skill、帮我判断该资产化到哪层、这个 AI 工作流要不要做成 Loop
  • 适合:判断一段可重复 AI 工作应该沉淀到哪个资产层,给出最小下一步 artifact 和验证信号。
  • 不适合:直接创建 Skill、直接实现自动化系统、普通日志根因定位、一次性事实查询、没有复用价值的闲聊。

Overview

这个 Skill 是 Router / Gate,不是执行器。它回答三个问题:

  1. 这段 AI 工作是否值得沉淀。
  2. 如果值得,最小有用资产层是什么。
  3. 为什么不是相邻层级。

默认输出应短、可执行、有证据。不要把所有重复任务都升级成 Skill,也不要把所有自动化想法都升级成 Loop。

Asset Layers

LayerUse WhenExample Artifact
Do Not Assetize低频、一次性、强主观、输入不可稳定复用、风险高或验收口径不存在。保留聊天记录或一次性笔记。
Prompt步骤简单,主要复用表达方式。Prompt template, checklist prompt.
Context Pack关键难点是资料、约束、样例和反例组织。Context folder, source bundle, glossary.
Workflow有稳定步骤、角色、输入输出和人工推进点。SOP, runbook, workflow doc.
Skill高频可复用,有明确触发语、输入、输出、边界和验收方式。SKILL.md + references/scripts.
Loop需要多轮状态、恢复、触发器、检查点、重试或人工接管。Loop contract, state files, update log.
System多个 Skill/Loop/Agent 组合,涉及权限、成本、审计、评估或团队级运行。Product/system PRD, architecture plan.

Workflow

  1. Identify input shape

    • AI conversation
    • repeated manual task
    • prompt or prompt pack
    • team workflow
    • successful delivery trace
    • failed or over-engineered asset proposal
  2. Extract evidence

    • user goal and business context
    • input materials and constraints
    • repeated steps
    • output artifact
    • human decision points
    • validation or acceptance criteria
    • frequency and reuse audience
    • state, retry, handoff, or automation needs
  3. Score only what matters

    • repeatability
    • input stability
    • output stability
    • validation clarity
    • context dependency
    • human judgment dependency
    • failure cost
    • reuse audience
  4. Recommend one primary asset layer

    • Give the smallest layer that would create real reuse.
    • Explain why the lower layer is insufficient.
    • Explain why the higher layer is overkill.
    • Include do-not-assetize if that is the best answer.
  5. Name the smallest next artifact

    • Prompt: one reusable prompt with slots.
    • Context Pack: file list and required metadata.
    • Workflow: step list and handoff format.
    • Skill: trigger description, non-triggers, output contract, references.
    • Loop: state files, stop conditions, Human Gate.
    • System: PRD / architecture / eval plan before implementation.
  6. Define reuse signal

    • What would prove this asset is worth deepening?
    • What failure signal should stop further investment?

Output Contract

Use this structure:

## Assetization Diagnosis

- Current shape: <conversation / prompt / context / workflow / skill candidate / loop candidate / system candidate>
- Recommended layer: <Do Not Assetize / Prompt / Context Pack / Workflow / Skill / Loop / System>
- Confidence: <High / Medium / Low>

## Evidence
- ...

## Why This Layer
- ...

## Why Not Adjacent Layers
- Lower layer is insufficient because ...
- Higher layer is overkill because ...

## Smallest Next Artifact
- ...

## Reuse Signal To Watch
- ...

## Do Not Do
- ...

For batch scenarios, use a compact table with columns:

  • Scenario
  • Current shape
  • Recommended layer
  • Evidence
  • Smallest next artifact
  • Reuse signal
  • Priority

Boundary Rules

  • If the user asks to create the actual Skill after diagnosis, hand off to skill-creator.
  • If the user asks whether an idea is a good product, use ai-collaboration-calibration or decision-research.
  • If the user asks to turn a product idea into a PRD, use prd-architect.
  • If the user asks to review an existing Skill, use skill-reviewer when available.
  • If the user provides trace/logs and wants root cause, use a trace/debug skill, not this one.
  • If the work is high responsibility, such as medical, legal, financial, safety, hiring, or compliance decisions, recommend human review and avoid closed-loop automation.

Non-Assetization Cases

Recommend not assetizing, or only a lightweight note, when:

  • The task happened once and is unlikely to recur.
  • The input varies so much that templates would mislead.
  • The output depends on taste or senior judgment with no stable rubric.
  • The cost of a wrong answer is high and no verification exists.
  • The user cannot name a reuse audience.
  • A simpler checklist would solve the problem.

Definition Of Done

  • The recommendation is one primary asset layer, not a vague list.
  • Adjacent layers are explicitly accepted or rejected.
  • The next artifact is small enough to create in one focused pass.
  • The answer includes a reuse or failure signal.
  • The diagnosis does not expose private context unless the user supplied and authorized it in this run.

Resources

  • references/asset-layer-rubric.md:当 Prompt / Context Pack / Workflow / Skill / Loop / System 边界不清时读取。
  • scripts/check_assetization_report.py:检查资产化诊断报告是否包含推荐层级、证据、最小下一步和复用信号。

Evaluation

Smoke prompts:

  • 这段工作是不是值得做成 Skill?
  • 这个 prompt 应该沉淀成 workflow 还是 Skill?
  • 我们连续三次做了类似 AI 协作,帮我判断该资产化到哪层。
  • 这只是一次性任务,不要过度沉淀。

Non-trigger prompts:

  • 直接帮我创建一个 Skill。
  • 看下这个 trace,定位根因。
  • 帮我写一个 PRD。
  • 查一下今天的新闻。

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Agent trace 诊断器:当用户提供 trace、日志 JSON、agent 执行记录、工具调用序列,或说“看下这个日志/trace,定位根因”“只说明问题不要改文件”时使用;用中文输出核心根因、可视化执行流程图、trace 证据链、可能文件/行和修复建议,默认只读。不用于没有日志证据的新功能设计、普通代码解释或直接修复代码。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

PANGKAIFENG/ai-product-manager-skills16Updated Aug 31, 2026

协作校准 / 认知校准 / 问题脑暴:当用户有模糊感受说不清问题、方案越补越复杂、想挑战假设、 想重新定义问题、想知道成熟领域里怎么叫这个问题时使用。 可用中文唤起:"帮我想想""先聊一下""一起脑暴""我感觉有问题但不清楚是什么" "先别执行,帮我看清问题""挑战我的假设""这个方案是不是想错了""帮我做认知校准" "双向钢人""钢人论证一下""正反最强论证,给我明确判断"。 也适用于:用户直接说"帮我做 X 功能""接入 Y 平台"但背景复杂、或对话早期感觉方向可能跑偏时, AI 主动识别并建议进入脑暴模式。 这里的“挑战假设”主要指问题定义、目标、约束和领域定位层面的假设;如果问题已确认且用户已有具体方案、 计划、架构或决策要压力测试,应转用 grill-me。不用于翻译、摘要、格式整理、单文件小改等简单执行任务。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

PANGKAIFENG/ai-product-manager-skills16Updated Aug 31, 2026

设计脑暴 / 实现前方案校准:当用户想把已基本成立的想法、功能方向或产品问题,在写 PRD、画 mockup 或进入开发计划前,先比较方案、确认取舍、对齐 UI/视觉约束,并收敛成可执行设计 spec 时使用。 可用中文唤起:“先脑暴一下方案”“先不要写 PRD,帮我设计几种路径”“参考 brainstorming 把这个需求变成设计 spec” “实现前先讨论设计”。问题还没定义清楚时先用 ai-collaboration-calibration;已有方案要压力测试时用 grill-me; 直接写 PRD 时用 prd-architect;grill-me 返回精确设计 gap 时,本 Skill 只输出 Design Delta。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

PANGKAIFENG/ai-product-manager-skills16Updated Aug 31, 2026

竞品决策分析 / Competitive Decision Brief:当用户要调研竞品、替代方案、新产品、SaaS/AI 产品或市场信号, 并希望把官网、定价、评论、文档、更新日志、登录态走查、截图或浏览器取证转成产品定位、路线图、定价、 功能优先级、差异化、Go/No-Go 或 PRD 输入时使用。核心行为是先锚定产品决策,再选择证据渠道, 最后输出可行动的 Product Decision Brief;不要把它降级成泛泛功能清单、纯 UX 走查或“点完所有按钮”报告。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

PANGKAIFENG/ai-product-manager-skills16Updated Aug 31, 2026

复杂探索资产化 / Complex Exploration:当用户面对复杂、不确定、多轮迭代的产品策略、Roadmap、商业化定价、竞品定位、复杂 PRD 前置探索、项目复盘或方法论沉淀任务时使用。它先判断任务类型,暴露隐含假设,重构真正问题,规划探索路径和中间产物,并在结束后沉淀认知、结构、方法论、工具和影响力资产。不用于简单润色、翻译、摘要、明确执行任务;问题只需早期认知校准时优先用 ai-collaboration-calibration,已有方案要压力测试时用 grill-me,系统专题研究用 research-topic-compiler。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

PANGKAIFENG/ai-product-manager-skills16Updated Aug 31, 2026

客户需求发现与澄清助手:当用户是销售、客户成功或售前,拿到客户模糊、宽泛、缺少产品边界的需求,需要先在内部最多五轮补齐关键事实,再生成一次性客户澄清问题清单、需求摘要与通用技术可行性判断时使用;当确认需求将落入 StyleWork 时加载可选产品与 UI 上下文,并可在信息足够或明确要求时输出带假设标记的轻量 Demo。不要用于直接报价、承诺交期、替代正式 PRD 或在信息不足时假装已有能力。

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

PANGKAIFENG/ai-product-manager-skills16Updated Aug 31, 2026

See all skills by PANGKAIFENG

Report a problem with this skill