ab-test-setup
FreePlan, design, and implement A/B tests and experiments with statistical rigor. Covers hypothesis frameworks, sample sizing, metrics, and result analysis.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Classify and triage security incidents through the full NIST SP 800-61 lifecycle: SEV1-4 severity scoring, false positive filtering, forensic evidence collection, and escalation routing.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run score Not tested
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Full lifecycle incident response from initial triage through forensic collection, severity declaration, and escalation routing. This is NOT threat hunting (see threat-detection) or post-incident review (see incident-commander).
python3 scripts/incident_triage.py --input event.json --classify --false-positive-check --json
The triage tool classifies events into 14 incident types, scores severity, filters false positives, and determines escalation paths.
Exit codes: 0 = SEV3/4 (standard handling), 1 = SEV2 (1-hour bridge), 2 = SEV1 (immediate war room).
| Level | Criteria | Escalation Path |
|---|---|---|
| SEV1 | Confirmed ransomware; active PII exfil >10K records; domain controller breach; CloudTrail disabled | SOC Lead -> CISO -> CEO -> Board |
| SEV2 | Unauthorized access to sensitive systems; credential compromise with priv-esc; lateral movement confirmed | SOC Lead -> CISO |
| SEV3 | Suspected unauthorized access (unconfirmed); malware contained; single account compromise | SOC Lead -> Security Manager |
| SEV4 | Alert with no confirmed impact; policy violation with no data risk | L3 Analyst queue |
Auto-escalation triggers: ransomware note found, active exfiltration confirmed, CloudTrail/SIEM disabled, second system compromised, C-suite account accessed.
Five filters run before escalation: CI/CD agent activity, test environment tagging, scheduled job patterns, whitelisted service accounts, scanner activity. Recurring false positives should be tuned at the detection layer.
Follow DFRWS six-phase framework (Identification -> Preservation -> Collection -> Examination -> Analysis -> Presentation). Collect volatile evidence first (RAM, running processes, network connections) before any containment action.
Chain of custody: SHA-256 hash at acquisition, UTC timestamp, tool provenance, investigator identity, transfer log.
Regulatory notification deadlines (clock starts at incident declaration):
| Framework | Deadline |
|---|---|
| GDPR | 72 hours |
| PCI-DSS v4.0 | 24 hours to acquirer |
| HIPAA (>500 individuals) | 60 days |
| SEC Rule | 4 business days |
| NIS2 | 24-hour early warning; 72-hour notification |
Full deadline reference with penalties: references/regulatory-deadlines.md
→ Read references/playbooks-and-comms.md for the compromised-credentials playbook (GitHub, npm, cloud, app secrets), AI incident classes with their first actions, and the internal, stakeholder and external notification templates
# Classify with false positive filtering
python3 scripts/incident_triage.py --input event.json --classify --false-positive-check --json
# Force severity for tabletop exercises
python3 scripts/incident_triage.py --input event.json --severity sev1 --json
# Read from stdin
echo '{"event_type": "ransomware", "host": "prod-db-01"}' | \
python3 scripts/incident_triage.py --classify --json
Input schema: {"event_type": "...", "host": "...", "user": "...", "source_ip": "...", "timestamp": "...", "raw_payload": {}}
| Skill | Relationship |
|---|---|
| threat-detection | Confirmed hunting findings escalate here for triage |
| cloud-security | Cloud posture findings may trigger incident classification |
| red-team | Red team findings validate detection coverage |
| security-pen-testing | Exploited pen test vulnerabilities escalate for active incident handling |
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Plan, design, and implement A/B tests and experiments with statistical rigor. Covers hypothesis frameworks, sample sizing, metrics, and result analysis.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Web/mobile accessibility decision guide: WCAG 2.2 AA, ARIA, keyboard nav, focus management, contrast, testing. Use for: a11y, accessibility, wcag, aria, screen reader, keyboard, contrast.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Generate, iterate, and scale ad creative for paid advertising across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, and X. Covers platform specs, creative frameworks, and quality validation.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Musica interactiva para juegos: layering vertical, re-secuenciacion horizontal, stingers, reglas de transicion con sync points, y mapeo de estados de gameplay a musica. Usar para: musica adaptativa, sistema de musica dinamica, transiciones musicales, combat music.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Design multi-agent systems, create agent architectures, define communication patterns, and build autonomous agent workflows with structured evaluation frameworks.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Inter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, response formats, and quality loops.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.