Use this skill to maintain a compliant DOT accident register. Covers § 390.15 requirements, what's recorded, retention period.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use this skill when the user asks about FMCSA's Crash Preventability Determination Program (CPDP) — how to dispute that a crash was non-preventable, eligible crash types, evidence requirements, how preventability findings affect SMS scoring + safety ratings, the difference between "preventability" and "fault," and the National Crash Preventability Program. Cite FMCSA CPDP guidance.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
The CPDP lets a motor carrier submit a Request for Data Review (RDR) for certain crash types in the FMCSA's database. If the agency determines a crash was non-preventable, that crash is excluded from the carrier's Crash Indicator BASIC.
Crashes feed the Crash Indicator BASIC in SMS / CSA scoring. Even a non-fault crash counts AGAINST the carrier's score until a preventability determination is made. A successful "non-preventable" finding removes it from the BASIC and improves your score.
Currently 16 crash types qualify for review:
To submit a successful preventability determination request:
The agency staff reviewing the request needs to see CLEARLY that the CMV driver did everything reasonable; the cause was the other party.
A crash determined "non-preventable" by FMCSA:
A crash determined "preventable":
dataqs.fmcsa.dot.gov and sign inDecision typically within 60-120 days.
Preventability — could the CMV driver, through any defensive driving action, have avoided this crash? (FMCSA standard)
Fault — who legally caused the crash? (State law / insurance standard)
A driver may be not at fault but still could have prevented the crash. The other party caused it, but the CMV driver had time to brake / swerve / avoid. In that case: preventability determination would be "preventable" even though the other party was at fault.
Conversely: a driver could be at fault (e.g., signal violation) but the resulting crash was inevitable from another driver's drunk driving. Preventability might still be "non-preventable."
A "non-preventable" finding by FMCSA does NOT bind insurance carriers or courts. Each insurance carrier conducts its own loss assessment. Each civil court determines fault separately.
But for CSA / FMCSA enforcement purposes, the non-preventable finding excludes the crash from BSI.
X3's incidents.html page tracks each crash + collects evidence needed for CPDP submissions. The agent-dataq-drafter Edge Function can draft a preventability narrative based on:
For a high-stakes preventability determination (e.g., a multi-injury or fatality crash), recommend the user work with their DOT compliance attorney before submitting.
The AI-powered DOT compliance platform for fleets 1–100 power units. Try a 7-day free trial — no credit card required — at https://x3compass.com/?utm_source=skill&utm_medium=github&utm_campaign=crash-preventability-determination
X3 Compass turns these skills into a complete operational platform: driver qualification files, drug & alcohol consortium, MVR pulls, hours-of-service tracking, hazmat shipping, IFTA filing, FMCSA audit prep, and DataQ dispute drafting — all CFR-cited, all in one place.
This skill is published under the X3 Compass open skills initiative. Contributions welcome at https://github.com/x3fleetsafety/skills
No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Use this skill to maintain a compliant DOT accident register. Covers § 390.15 requirements, what's recorded, retention period.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use this skill to investigate a crash effectively. Covers preservation of evidence, witness statements, dashcam review, and reporting timeline.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use this skill to document crashes that don't qualify as DOT-recordable. Covers what to track, why it matters, and insurance/CSA implications.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use this skill to handle the subrogation and claim process after a crash. Covers when subrogation applies, how to pursue it, and timeline.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use this skill when the user asks about accident claims management — first-notice-of-loss procedures, working with insurance adjusters, claim severity classification, subrogation, claim closure timelines, and how to influence claim outcomes. Different from accident-investigation-playbook (which covers facts); this covers the insurance + claim side.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Use this skill when the user asks how to investigate a CMV accident — what to do at the scene, the first 24 hours, evidence preservation, who to call, preventability determination, ELD data preservation, dash cam review, witness interviews, working with insurance + attorney, and how to build a learning culture from incidents. Reference 49 CFR 392.7 + insurance industry best practices.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.