Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

repo-understand

Use when a learner asks to learn from a repository and the agent must map curriculum structure and prerequisites before teaching.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

Run score Not tested

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md3.0 KB
  • examples.md1.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Purpose

Create a reliable curriculum map before deep teaching. Prevents shallow file retrieval by forcing the agent to infer learning structure, identify prerequisite dependencies, and recommend coherent starting paths.

Activation

  • User asks to learn a repository, course repo, or technical curriculum. User asks "where should I start?" in a multi-module repo. Agent hasn't established module sequence and prerequisites.
  • Skip if: user wants a narrow operational task unrelated to learning flow, or repo context is absent and user wants generic theory.
  • Routing: run before teach-concept, socratic-mode, check-understanding, and build-with-me for repo-based learning.

Inputs

  • Repository root and visible structure, high-signal docs (README, syllabus, indexes), learner goal and level signals.

Workflow

  1. Classify — Determine repo type: curriculum-first, project-first, reference-first, or hybrid. Identify learning artifacts (lessons, labs, projects, checkpoints).
  2. Map Hierarchy — Derive module/phase order from folder structure and docs. Produce a phase map with outcomes per phase.
  3. Infer Prerequisites — For each phase, list conceptual and tooling prerequisites. Mark dependency edges between phases.
  4. Estimate Progression — Foundational → applied → advanced. Identify transition points where learners often stall.
  5. Synthesize Paths — Propose 2–3 path variants based on learner goals and level, with tradeoffs and estimated effort.
  6. Checkpoint — Ask one decision-forcing question to select a path. Do not start deep instruction before the learner selects or confirms.

Rules

  • DO: require a phase map before any deep explanation.
  • DO: explain why sequence matters, not just what modules exist.
  • DO: provide goal-conditioned paths with tradeoffs — never a single path for all learners.
  • DO: surface uncertainty explicitly when repo signals are weak.
  • DON'T: quote random files without structural context.
  • DON'T: recommend advanced topics before prerequisite chain is visible.
  • DON'T: dump long directory trees — cap orientation to phase outcomes and decisions.
  • DON'T: invent lessons/modules without evidence — label inferred items as tentative.

Output

Responses should contain: repo type classification, learner goal/level, curriculum map (phases + outcomes), prerequisite chain, 2–3 recommended paths with tradeoffs, checkpoint question, and next step. Format naturally.

Checklist

  • Curriculum map includes ordered phases and outcomes.
  • Prerequisite chain is explicit.
  • At least two goal-conditioned paths provided.
  • Checkpoint question asked before deep teaching begins.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Use when critiquing a system design across correctness, scalability, reliability, maintainability, and observability using probe-first questioning.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

yugash007/edu-agent-skills10Updated May 19, 2026

Use when guiding a learner through real project implementation while preserving their ownership and teaching through the build process.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

yugash007/edu-agent-skills10Updated May 19, 2026

Use when generating personalized practice challenges calibrated to the learner's weak areas, level, and project context.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

yugash007/edu-agent-skills10Updated May 19, 2026

Use when verifying whether the learner truly understands a concept through reasoning and application, not recall trivia.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

yugash007/edu-agent-skills10Updated May 19, 2026

Use when coaching hypothesis-driven debugging that requires the learner to gather evidence and reason about root causes before applying fixes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

yugash007/edu-agent-skills10Updated May 19, 2026

Use when a learner has surface understanding and needs to explore mechanism, tradeoffs, edge cases, and production implications at depth.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

yugash007/edu-agent-skills10Updated May 19, 2026

See all skills by yugash007

Report a problem with this skill