Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

model-assumptions-builder

Extract and maintain global and method-specific mathematical-model assumptions from the problem frame, active method cards, data profile, and risk probes, while leaving necessity and impact judgments to the human modeler.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md1.9 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Inputs

  • problem parse;
  • active method cards;
  • data profile and risk-probe summaries;
  • question dependency map;
  • existing assumptions and human decisions.

Read legacy candidate pools only during migration.

Workflow

  1. Extract explicit problem assumptions and method-induced assumptions.
  2. Remove filler statements that do not affect model validity or interpretation.
  3. For each assumption record:
    • scope and source;
    • modeling need;
    • applicable method/Qx;
    • validation evidence;
    • mitigation or fallback link.
  4. Identify conflicts across Qx.
  5. Present unresolved necessity/impact trade-offs in one compact choice card where possible.
  6. Log human assumption_necessity decisions in qx_decisions.jsonl.
  7. Save planning/model_assumptions.md, transcribing settled human labels and impacts with decision IDs.

Assumption Fields

  • ID;
  • statement;
  • scope;
  • source and modeling need;
  • human-confirmed type: necessary or simplifying;
  • validation method/evidence;
  • impact if violated;
  • mitigation/fallback;
  • decision ID.

Rules

  • Do not invent generic assumptions such as “data are accurate” unless they affect a real dependency.
  • Do not finalize necessary/simplifying or impact judgments for the human.
  • Do not leave many repeated sentinels in the final file; collect missing judgments through a choice card and stop finalization until answered.
  • Revisit an assumption only when its method, evidence, or downstream use materially changes.

Verification

  • Every assumption has a modeling need and source.
  • Human-owned labels trace to decisions.
  • Probe/robustness evidence addresses load-bearing assumptions.
  • Cross-Qx conflicts are resolved or explicit.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Detect whether approved modeling code is Python or MATLAB/Beita Tianyuan and route it to the matching reviewer using the compact named-check review contract.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Audit whether the semantic evidence required by the active lean or submission profile exists and is current, without requiring one verbose artifact per skill or an arbitrary number of pass bullets.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Run scoped or final cross-media consistency checks for mathematical-modeling artifacts, comparing canonical numbers, symbols, parameters, decisions, files, and paper claims without performing full-workspace audits for low-risk changes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Map contest attachments to subquestions, audit and clean raw data, and emit one reusable data profile with quality, coverage, imbalance, concentration, and method-readiness evidence for downstream risk screening.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Build one compact choice card at a genuine mathematical-modeling judgment point. Use before method screening, after a meaningful experiment, or before final claim/freeze approval so the human chooses the trade-off while AI handles mechanical consequences.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Plan the smallest set of diagnostic, comparison, paper, and appendix figures or tables needed to support verified mathematical-modeling decisions and claims.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

See all skills by zhnnky329

Report a problem with this skill