Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

paper-section-writer

Draft submission-ready mathematical-modeling paper sections from the approved solution package, frozen numbers, human decision ledger, and verified figures without searching scattered exploratory outputs or inventing interpretation.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.6 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Preconditions

  • rigor_profile is submission.
  • Final method explanation exists.
  • Final result analysis exists.
  • Solution package and current frozen numbers exist.
  • Required human claim-scope and physical/domain-meaning decisions are recorded.

If any prerequisite is missing, return to its producer rather than drafting around the gap.

Primary Sources

Use, in order:

  1. qx_solution_package_for_writer.md
  2. frozen_numbers.json
  3. qx_decisions.jsonl
  4. verified paper figures/tables
  5. final method explanation and robustness report for clarification

Do not hunt through raw experiment folders to invent a narrative.

Workflow

  1. Resolve the requested section and contest format.
  2. Build a claim map:
    • claim ID;
    • frozen value/source;
    • robustness support;
    • human decision ID;
    • figure/table reference;
    • limitation.
  3. Draft the method description to match the final explanation and code.
  4. Draft results with:
    • value and comparison;
    • human-confirmed physical/domain meaning;
    • uncertainty or robustness;
    • limitation and applicable scope.
  5. Mention the baseline and eliminated alternatives only when they explain a real decision.
  6. Use only Type 2–4 figures as appropriate; never place Type 1 diagnostics in the paper.
  7. Save paper/sections/qx.tex or the requested Markdown section.

Human-Owned Content

The AI must not originate:

  • why the method was chosen;
  • what the headline number means physically;
  • confidence and claim scope;
  • contribution framing.

Transcribe these from the decision ledger with provenance. If absent, invoke a compact choice card and stop the final draft until answered; do not fill the paper with repeated sentinels.

Rules

  • Every numerical claim must match frozen_numbers.json.
  • Do not overclaim against untested methods or populations.
  • Do not fabricate citations or causal meaning.
  • Avoid procedural diary prose and ceremonial detail.
  • Keep formulas, symbols, units, captions, and filenames consistent.
  • Do not create a new decision artifact.

Verification

  • Three writer prerequisites pass.
  • Claim map resolves all numbers and judgments.
  • Method, results, and figures match canonical artifacts.
  • Physical meaning and contribution are human-owned.
  • Limitations and uncertainty are visible.
  • No Type 1 figure appears.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Detect whether approved modeling code is Python or MATLAB/Beita Tianyuan and route it to the matching reviewer using the compact named-check review contract.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Audit whether the semantic evidence required by the active lean or submission profile exists and is current, without requiring one verbose artifact per skill or an arbitrary number of pass bullets.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Run scoped or final cross-media consistency checks for mathematical-modeling artifacts, comparing canonical numbers, symbols, parameters, decisions, files, and paper claims without performing full-workspace audits for low-risk changes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Map contest attachments to subquestions, audit and clean raw data, and emit one reusable data profile with quality, coverage, imbalance, concentration, and method-readiness evidence for downstream risk screening.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Build one compact choice card at a genuine mathematical-modeling judgment point. Use before method screening, after a meaningful experiment, or before final claim/freeze approval so the human chooses the trade-off while AI handles mechanical consequences.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Plan the smallest set of diagnostic, comparison, paper, and appendix figures or tables needed to support verified mathematical-modeling decisions and claims.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

See all skills by zhnnky329

Report a problem with this skill