Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

problem-classifier

Classify each parsed mathematical-modeling subquestion by required output and structure, surface ambiguous framing trade-offs for human choice, and record primary/secondary task types without selecting algorithms.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (2)

  • SKILL.md2.4 KB
  • references/task-type-guide.md1.5 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Preconditions

  • planning/parse/problem_parse.json exists and maps every Qx to an output.
  • Material framing ambiguities are visible.

Read legacy parse paths only during migration.

Task Types

  • evaluation/ranking;
  • prediction/estimation;
  • optimization/decision;
  • mechanism/dynamics;
  • classification/clustering;
  • graph/routing/network;
  • simulation/scenario;
  • descriptive/inference;
  • mixed.

Detailed cues are in references/task-type-guide.md.

Workflow

  1. Classify from the required output, decision structure, constraints, and relationships—not keywords alone.
  2. Assign:
    • primary type;
    • optional secondary type;
    • confidence;
    • evidence from the parse;
    • consequences for validation and deliverables.
  3. Identify mixed or ambiguous framings that would change what the team can claim.
  4. For a load-bearing ambiguity, invoke one choice card explaining consequences. Do not silently settle it.
  5. Save planning/classification/problem_classification.json.
  6. Record the human framing decision in methods/Qx/qx_decisions.jsonl, or in planning/framing_decisions.jsonl when the Qx method directory does not yet exist.

Output Contract

{
  "schema_version": 1,
  "subquestions": [
    {
      "id": "Q1",
      "primary_type": "evaluation",
      "secondary_type": null,
      "confidence": "high",
      "evidence": [],
      "required_validation": [],
      "framing_decision_id": null,
      "risks": []
    }
  ]
}

Rules

  • Do not propose or choose methods.
  • Do not classify only from nouns such as “forecast” or “optimal”; verify the required output.
  • A subquestion may be mixed, but avoid listing many types without prioritization.
  • Human framing is required when alternative classifications lead to materially different outputs or claims.
  • Do not create a long taxonomy report when the JSON record is sufficient.

Verification

  • Every Qx has one primary type.
  • Mixed/secondary types are justified.
  • Classification evidence resolves to the parse.
  • Ambiguous framing is human-confirmed or remains a blocker.
  • No algorithm selection leaked into classification.

Reference

  • references/task-type-guide.md

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Detect whether approved modeling code is Python or MATLAB/Beita Tianyuan and route it to the matching reviewer using the compact named-check review contract.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Audit whether the semantic evidence required by the active lean or submission profile exists and is current, without requiring one verbose artifact per skill or an arbitrary number of pass bullets.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Run scoped or final cross-media consistency checks for mathematical-modeling artifacts, comparing canonical numbers, symbols, parameters, decisions, files, and paper claims without performing full-workspace audits for low-risk changes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Map contest attachments to subquestions, audit and clean raw data, and emit one reusable data profile with quality, coverage, imbalance, concentration, and method-readiness evidence for downstream risk screening.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Build one compact choice card at a genuine mathematical-modeling judgment point. Use before method screening, after a meaningful experiment, or before final claim/freeze approval so the human chooses the trade-off while AI handles mechanical consequences.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Plan the smallest set of diagnostic, comparison, paper, and appendix figures or tables needed to support verified mathematical-modeling decisions and claims.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

See all skills by zhnnky329

Report a problem with this skill