Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

result-report-generator

Summarize modeling experiment evidence, compare the approved main method with a usable baseline, surface fallback triggers, and produce a decision-point or final report without creating routine per-round prose.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.7 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Purpose

Turn saved experiment artifacts into compact evidence. Do not treat ordinary successful runs as requiring a long report, and do not choose the winning method.

Inputs

  • run_summary.json
  • method card and probe summary
  • decision ledger
  • saved tables, metrics, and figures
  • session rigor_profile

Stop if the run summary claims outputs that do not exist or if main and baseline are not comparable.

Modes

Ordinary lean round

  • Validate the run summary and referenced artifacts.
  • Return a compact evidence digest in the conversation.
  • Do not save a Markdown report unless:
    • a fallback trigger fired;
    • a material anomaly or contradiction exists;
    • the human must make a proceed/adjust/fallback decision.

Decision-point round

Save:

results/Qx/experiments/roundN/qx_decision_report.md

Include only:

  • main vs baseline metrics;
  • output-degeneracy/concentration evidence;
  • assumption or feasibility warnings;
  • robustness evidence already available;
  • fallback trigger state;
  • unresolved trade-offs.

Then invoke decision-prompt-builder. After the human answers, route the answer to modeler-decision-logger.

Final/submission mode

Save:

results/Qx/reports/qx_final_result_analysis.md

Include:

  • final main/baseline comparison;
  • uncertainty and error;
  • concentration/degeneracy interpretation;
  • robustness links;
  • limitations and applicable scope;
  • exact source paths for numerical claims.

Rejection and Fallback

  • Archive a method only after a human result_verdict or fallback_activation decision.
  • Move rejected code and outputs to workspace/archived/<Qx>/<method>_REJECTED_roundN/.
  • Add one compact history line to qx_method_card.md; do not create a separate iteration log.
  • Do not archive from an AI suggestion alone.

Rules

  • Do not fabricate metrics, comparisons, or interpretations.
  • Separate facts from human verdicts.
  • Do not create result-report-generator_modeler_decision.md.
  • Do not repeat the full run summary; cite it and extract only decision-relevant evidence.
  • Do not call a diagnostic reference a usable baseline.
  • Do not generate paper prose.

Verification

  • Every reported number resolves to a saved artifact.
  • Main/baseline comparison uses the same split, unit, and metric definition.
  • Output concentration and fallback trigger are addressed.
  • Reports are generated only at decision points or final mode.
  • Human verdicts are read from or appended to the canonical JSONL ledger.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Detect whether approved modeling code is Python or MATLAB/Beita Tianyuan and route it to the matching reviewer using the compact named-check review contract.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Audit whether the semantic evidence required by the active lean or submission profile exists and is current, without requiring one verbose artifact per skill or an arbitrary number of pass bullets.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Run scoped or final cross-media consistency checks for mathematical-modeling artifacts, comparing canonical numbers, symbols, parameters, decisions, files, and paper claims without performing full-workspace audits for low-risk changes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Map contest attachments to subquestions, audit and clean raw data, and emit one reusable data profile with quality, coverage, imbalance, concentration, and method-readiness evidence for downstream risk screening.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Build one compact choice card at a genuine mathematical-modeling judgment point. Use before method screening, after a meaningful experiment, or before final claim/freeze approval so the human chooses the trade-off while AI handles mechanical consequences.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Plan the smallest set of diagnostic, comparison, paper, and appendix figures or tables needed to support verified mathematical-modeling decisions and claims.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

See all skills by zhnnky329

Report a problem with this skill