code-reviewer
FreeDetect whether approved modeling code is Python or MATLAB/Beita Tianyuan and route it to the matching reviewer using the compact named-check review contract.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Summarize modeling experiment evidence, compare the approved main method with a usable baseline, surface fallback triggers, and produce a decision-point or final report without creating routine per-round prose.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
See how to installReview the instructions the agent will receive before you install.
Turn saved experiment artifacts into compact evidence. Do not treat ordinary successful runs as requiring a long report, and do not choose the winning method.
run_summary.jsonrigor_profileStop if the run summary claims outputs that do not exist or if main and baseline are not comparable.
Save:
results/Qx/experiments/roundN/qx_decision_report.md
Include only:
Then invoke decision-prompt-builder. After the human answers, route the answer to modeler-decision-logger.
Save:
results/Qx/reports/qx_final_result_analysis.md
Include:
result_verdict or fallback_activation decision.workspace/archived/<Qx>/<method>_REJECTED_roundN/.qx_method_card.md; do not create a separate iteration log.result-report-generator_modeler_decision.md.No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.
No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.
No comments yet. Be the first to write one.
Detect whether approved modeling code is Python or MATLAB/Beita Tianyuan and route it to the matching reviewer using the compact named-check review contract.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Audit whether the semantic evidence required by the active lean or submission profile exists and is current, without requiring one verbose artifact per skill or an arbitrary number of pass bullets.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Run scoped or final cross-media consistency checks for mathematical-modeling artifacts, comparing canonical numbers, symbols, parameters, decisions, files, and paper claims without performing full-workspace audits for low-risk changes.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Map contest attachments to subquestions, audit and clean raw data, and emit one reusable data profile with quality, coverage, imbalance, concentration, and method-readiness evidence for downstream risk screening.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Build one compact choice card at a genuine mathematical-modeling judgment point. Use before method screening, after a meaningful experiment, or before final claim/freeze approval so the human chooses the trade-off while AI handles mechanical consequences.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.
Plan the smallest set of diagnostic, comparison, paper, and appendix figures or tables needed to support verified mathematical-modeling decisions and claims.
The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.