Skip to content
cccskills
FreePublished on GitHub

robustness-checker

Design and run risk-targeted robustness, sensitivity, error, and baseline checks for an approved mathematical model, emitting compact machine evidence in lean mode and a final report in submission mode.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

See how to install

Files included (1)

  • SKILL.md2.3 KB

SKILL.md (original)

Review the instructions the agent will receive before you install.

Purpose

Test the claims most likely to fail. Choose checks from the model's assumptions and decision risks rather than filling a generic checklist.

Preconditions

  • Approved main and usable baseline executed.
  • Run summary, method card, probe summary, and relevant outputs exist.
  • Claim or decision to be tested is known.

Workflow

  1. Identify load-bearing assumptions and claims.
  2. Select applicable checks:
    • parameter or weight perturbation;
    • alternate split or resampling;
    • seed stability;
    • outlier/missing-data treatment;
    • constraint/capacity perturbation;
    • baseline comparison;
    • output concentration/rank stability;
    • error and uncertainty analysis.
  3. State perturbation ranges and why they are meaningful before interpreting results.
  4. Run checks with fixed seeds where stochastic.
  5. Save compact metrics to:

robustness/Qx/qx_robustness_summary.json

  1. In submission, also save:

robustness/Qx/qx_robustness_report.md

  1. If the stability verdict affects method continuation or claim scope, invoke one choice card and log the human answer in qx_decisions.jsonl.

Summary Contract

Record:

  • tested claim/assumption;
  • input and result source paths;
  • perturbation;
  • metric and threshold if predeclared;
  • observed value;
  • status PASS, CONDITIONAL, or FAIL;
  • limitation;
  • fallback-trigger relevance.

Rules

  • Do not run irrelevant checks merely to reach a count.
  • Do not invent a threshold after seeing the result without labeling it exploratory.
  • Do not convert stability metrics into the human confidence verdict.
  • Do not create robustness-checker_modeler_decision.md.
  • A failed robustness check is evidence for adjust/fallback/claim downgrade, not permission for AI to decide.

Verification

  • Every major final claim has a supporting check or explicit limitation.
  • Perturbations are justified and reproducible.
  • Baseline and main comparisons remain metric-compatible.
  • Concentration/degeneracy risks are revisited when relevant.
  • Submission report sources its numbers from the summary and experiment artifacts.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tell others what you thought.

Comments

No login needed. Share how it worked for you, ask a question, or note where it did not run.

No comments yet. Be the first to write one.

Comments are published right away. Do not include personal information such as email addresses or phone numbers. Up to 2 URLs.

0 / 1,000 characters

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA, and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

More skills from this repository

Detect whether approved modeling code is Python or MATLAB/Beita Tianyuan and route it to the matching reviewer using the compact named-check review contract.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Audit whether the semantic evidence required by the active lean or submission profile exists and is current, without requiring one verbose artifact per skill or an arbitrary number of pass bullets.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Run scoped or final cross-media consistency checks for mathematical-modeling artifacts, comparing canonical numbers, symbols, parameters, decisions, files, and paper claims without performing full-workspace audits for low-risk changes.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Map contest attachments to subquestions, audit and clean raw data, and emit one reusable data profile with quality, coverage, imbalance, concentration, and method-readiness evidence for downstream risk screening.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Build one compact choice card at a genuine mathematical-modeling judgment point. Use before method screening, after a meaningful experiment, or before final claim/freeze approval so the human chooses the trade-off while AI handles mechanical consequences.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Plan the smallest set of diagnostic, comparison, paper, and appendix figures or tables needed to support verified mathematical-modeling decisions and claims.

The English summary is being prepared. Showing the original description.

zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills1.1KUpdated Sep 24, 2026

See all skills by zhnnky329

Report a problem with this skill