테스트 설계, 취약점 진단, 품질 보증 (1.3만건)
Use when writing E2E/integration tests, testing native interactions like permissions or system dialogs, capturing UI regressions, or validating cross-platform behavior (Patrol 4.x).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Direct browser control via the Browser Use Terminal CLI. Use when the user wants to automate, scrape, test, or interact with web pages — you drive the browser yourself with Python helpers.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Weekly. Audits the paid and measurement setup the member already has by reading it, then assembles the parts that are missing as local files: campaign structure, ad copy, negative keyword seeds, and conversion tracking specifications, each one complete and ready to paste. It creates nothing in an account, saves nothing, activates nothing, and spends nothing, unless you released the channel. This is where the spend stop lives.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Monthly, on the last weekday. Re-tests every segment in strategy/icp.md against the evidence in this kit's own ledgers, then rewrites the targeting itself where the evidence disagrees with the assumption the segment was written on. It records every change in strategy/CHANGELOG.md. It sends only where you released the channel, never re-queues anyone, never edits the contacted ledger, and never writes a number it did not read out of a named file.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Monthly on the last weekday, light browser lane. Re-tests every theme and every severity rule against a month of real ticket evidence and rewrites strategy/themes.md wherever the evidence disagrees with the assumption. It merges two themes the evidence shows are one, splits a theme whose tickets have two different answers, retires a theme with no volume, creates a theme for a cluster that kept landing unclassified, and rewrites a severity rule wherever the outcomes contradict it. Theme ids are never reused and never renumbered. It holds every outbound action unless you released the channel, and it never touches a credential.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Hire one of the eight open source AI Employees (GTM Engineer, SEO/AEO, Web Dev, Social Media, Ad Manager, Sales, Customer Satisfaction, Chief of Staff) into a local folder, prove it runs, and hand over its install prompt. Also answers which one to hire first, how a hired employee runs on a schedule, how to direct it, how it improves from corrections, and how to upgrade it. Use when the user says hire an employee, install an AI employee, set up the GTM Engineer, names one of the eight, or asks how AI Employees work. It copies files and runs self tests only. It registers no schedule and sends nothing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Runs once by hand on the first day and once a month after that. On the first run it researches the business from its own public presence, writes the charter with a source and a date beside every conclusion, discovers the AI Employees actually installed on this machine within a bounded search, writes the map every other routine in this kit reads, seeds the priorities and the watchlist once, builds the fleet dashboard, and registers this Employee's own seven jobs. On every monthly run it re-runs discovery and reconciles the map against what is really there. It never writes into another Employee's folder, never registers a job it does not own, sends only where you released the channel, spends only where you released it, and never touches a credential.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit and improve the prompt surface of Avibe Agents across backends (Claude, Codex/GPT, OpenCode) — global and project rules, Agent system prompts, Skills, delegation briefs, and Task and Watch messages — using real run evidence. Use when an Agent misbehaves (stalls, over-asks, over-reaches, ignores or over-applies a rule), after a model or backend change, or when the user asks to review, clean up, or tighten prompts.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit websites for SEO, technical, content, security, JS rendering, and AI readiness using SEOmator CLI. Returns LLM-optimized reports with health scores across 373 rules and 20 categories, and can diff two audits to show what a deploy changed. Use when analyzing websites, debugging SEO issues, checking site health, or comparing a site before and after a change.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create a small random Hugging Face model that preserves the original architecture and can serve as a local Optimum Intel repository test fixture.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Add and validate support for a Hugging Face model architecture in the Optimum Intel OpenVINO backend, including exporter configuration, patching, repository tests, and documentation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Security design principles, STRIDE threat modeling, OWASP Top 10 architectural mitigations, and secure patterns. Load when designing systems or reviewing architecture for security.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Methodology for minimizing test count while maximizing behavioral coverage - behavior definition, anti-pattern catalog, consolidation patterns, stopping criterion, coverage-preserving validation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design mandates for acceptance tests - hexagonal boundary, business language abstraction, user journey completeness, pure function extraction, 3 Pillars (domain language / chained narrative / production composition), and the layered ATD discipline (Universe-bound assertion, layer-dependent PBT mode, two-tier acceptance, example-based sad paths)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Quality gates - 11 commit readiness gates, build/test protocol, validation checkpoints, and quality metrics
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Deep knowledge for Outside-In TDD - double-loop architecture, ATDD integration, port-to-port testing, walking skeletons, and test doubles policy
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Reviewer critique dimensions for peer review - implementation bias detection, test quality validation, completeness checks, and priority validation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Test design mandate enforcement, test budget validation, TDD phase validation (3-phase canon per ADR-025), and external validity checks for the software crafter reviewer
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Port the state-delta + property-based testing paradigm to languages other than Python. DIY recipes per language; canonical Python ref shipped in nwave_ai.state_delta.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Runs a timeboxed PROBE to validate one core assumption, then optionally PROMOTES the probe into a walking skeleton — the first e2e thin slice of the feature, committed and demo-able. Use after DISCUSS when the feature involves a new mechanism, performance requirement, or external integration.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Speculative parallel implementation methodology — dispatch N candidate implementations, audit all, score, pick best. Auditability mandate: ALL candidates logged (not just winner).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Property-based testing strategies, mutation testing, shrinking, and combined PBT+mutation workflow for test quality validation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Database security (encryption, access control, injection prevention), data governance (lineage, quality, MDM), and compliance frameworks (GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA)
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Detailed refactoring mechanics with step-by-step procedures, and test code smell catalog with detection patterns and before/after examples
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.