Debug, patch, and verify failed Agent QA runs from MCP evidence, artifacts, logs, and local code without hiding product or infrastructure defects.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
테스트 설계, 취약점 진단, 품질 보증 (1.3만건)
Debug, patch, and verify failed Agent QA runs from MCP evidence, artifacts, logs, and local code without hiding product or infrastructure defects.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Find and fix WCAG 2.2 accessibility issues. Two modes — report (sweep a codebase or page, produce a prioritized written report, no edits) and fix (audit→edit→verify loop on a target). Prefers direct-CDP live-DOM auditing; falls back to a browser-MCP composition or HTML-string audits.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when designing an A/B or split test: define the hypothesis, control and variants, estimate sample size, verify tracking, and predeclare metrics and stopping rules.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Prepare the local environment for the Maestro smoke-test suite — verify tooling, select a device, collect the APK if needed, validate the .env file by variable name only, then hand the user the exact lab-store CLI command to run or run it on request.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Provision a disposable Jurassic Ninja store for the Maestro smoke suite, connect Jetpack to the developer's own WordPress.com test account, create WooCommerce API keys, and write .maestro/.env.local. Use when Maestro setup is missing, when .env.local points at an expired store, or when a clean store is wanted.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
POS unit testing patterns (WooPosCoroutineTestRule, runTest, advanceUntilIdle, mockito-kotlin, event bus mocking, analytics verification). Use when writing, editing, exploring, debugging, or reviewing unit tests for POS (WooPos*) code. NOT for main store app tests — use the `store-tests` skill instead.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
POS (Point of Sale) architecture and patterns. Use when writing, editing, exploring, debugging, fixing bugs, implementing features, or reviewing WooPos-prefixed classes or files under ui/woopos/. POS uses a different architecture than the main app — plain ViewModel (not ScopedViewModel), pure Compose (no Fragments), Compose Navigation (no nav graphs), parent-child SharedFlow event bus. Loading this skill prevents applying main-app patterns that would be wrong for POS. For analytics use `pos-analytics`, for tests use `pos-tests`.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Main app unit testing patterns (BaseUnitTest, BDD naming, mockito-kotlin, AssertJ, StateFlow/LiveData capture, coroutine dispatchers). Use when writing, editing, exploring, debugging, or reviewing unit tests in the store management app. For POS (WooPos*) tests, use the `pos-tests` skill instead.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
On-site and remote vendor audit procedures per GDPR Article 28(3)(h). Covers audit planning, evidence collection methodologies, finding classification, remediation tracking, and audit report generation for processor compliance verification.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Universal opt-out mechanism implementation across US state privacy laws. Covers Global Privacy Control (GPC) signal technical implementation, state-by-state recognition requirements, browser detection methods, authenticated vs unauthenticated handling, and compliance testing.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides SOC 2 Type II Privacy Trust Services Criteria preparation and audit execution. Covers AICPA TSP Section 100 Privacy criteria P1-P8 including notice, choice/consent, collection, use/retention/disposal, access, disclosure, security, and quality. Includes evidence collection, control testing, and report review. Keywords: SOC 2, privacy criteria, TSP, AICPA, Type II, trust services.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides maintenance of cross-border transfer registers, audit trails, and compliance documentation under GDPR Art. 30 and Art. 46, EDPB record-keeping guidance, and supervisory authority expectations. Keywords: transfer register, audit trail, Art. 30, Art. 46, documentation, compliance records.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Texas Data Privacy and Security Act (TDPSA) compliance. No revenue threshold applies to all businesses. Covers data broker registration requirements, biometric identifier provisions under CUBI, consumer rights, AG enforcement, and 30-day cure period. Effective July 1, 2024.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guides implementation of technical, contractual, and organisational supplementary measures for international data transfers per EDPB Recommendations 01/2020. Covers encryption, pseudonymisation, split processing, audit rights, transparency obligations, and internal policies. Keywords: supplementary measures, encryption, pseudonymisation, EDPB recommendations, transfer safeguards.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Manages retention exception workflows including request-approval processes, duration limits, periodic review cycles, documentation requirements, and audit trail maintenance. Covers legitimate grounds for extending retention beyond scheduled periods and governance controls to prevent indefinite data hoarding. Activate for retention exception, retention extension, data hoarding prevention, retention override queries.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design and implement Purpose-Based Access Control (PBAC) architecture including purpose ontology definition, policy engine configuration, audit logging of purpose verification at query time, and integration with existing IAM systems. Enforces GDPR Article 5(1)(b) purpose limitation technically.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Assessment of pseudonymization techniques and re-identification risk. Covers tokenization, hashing, encryption-based pseudonymization, and hybrid approaches. Includes re-identification risk scoring using the motivated intruder test, quantitative metrics (marketer, journalist, prosecutor models), and linkage attack resilience evaluation. References ENISA 2019 pseudonymization report.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Creates GDPR Article 30(2) Records of Processing Activities for data processors with all four mandatory fields: processor and controller names and contact details, categories of processing, third country transfers, and security measures description. Activate for processor RoPA, Art. 30(2), processor records, sub-processor documentation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audits Records of Processing Activities against supervisory authority templates from CNIL, ICO, and BfDI. Provides completeness scoring, gap identification, and remediation tracking. Activate for RoPA audit, completeness check, supervisory authority readiness, CNIL template, ICO template, BfDI template, gap analysis.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Conducts pre-DPIA threshold screening to determine whether a full Data Protection Impact Assessment is required under GDPR Article 35. Applies the EDPB WP248rev.01 nine-criteria test, national supervisory authority blacklists, and organisational risk appetite to produce a documented screening decision. Keywords: threshold screening, DPIA trigger, pre-DPIA, WP248, Article 35(1), blacklist, screening decision.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Classifies personal vs non-personal data per GDPR Art. 4(1) definition test with decision tree for borderline cases. References Breyer v Germany CJEU C-582/14 dynamic IP ruling and WP29 Opinion 4/2007. Keywords: personal data, GDPR Art 4, data classification, Breyer ruling, identifiability test, PII.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.