테스트·보안 스킬

EXPERIMENTAL. Use when working the project-wide out-of-scope backlog at paad/code-reviews/backlog.md and paad/security/backlog.md — cleaning it of entries that are already fixed or gone, or picking the next entry and fixing it end-to-end. Not for producing backlog entries — that is /agentic-review — and not for reviewing a branch diff.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates structured usability test scenarios with realistic tasks, success criteria, and facilitation notes — ready to run with real participants or in a moderated session.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design a usability test plan with tasks, success metrics, participant criteria, and facilitation guide. Use when planning moderated or unmoderated usability testing sessions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," or "site navigation." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have and how they connect. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to add, fix, or optimize schema markup and structured data on their site. Also use when the user mentions "schema markup," "structured data," "JSON-LD," "rich snippets," "schema.org," "FAQ schema," "product schema," "review schema," "breadcrumb schema," "Google rich results," "knowledge panel," "star ratings in search," or "add structured data." Use this whenever someone wants their pages to show enhanced results in Google. For broader SEO issues, see seo-audit. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Full website SEO audit with parallel subagent delegation. Crawls up to 500 pages, detects business type, delegates to up to 15 specialists (8 always + 7 conditional), generates health score. Use when user says audit, full SEO check, analyze my site, or website health check.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to review pull requests, analyze code changes, check for security issues in PRs, or assess code quality of diffs.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," or "indexing issues." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audits any landing or service page across 48 checks in 10 categories for LLM/AI discoverability, GEO readiness, content clarity, schema markup, internal linking, freshness signals, and technical crawlability. Produces an overall score out of 100, a per-category score out of 100, pass/warn/fail/ manual counts, and a prioritised fix list — all rendered as a standalone HTML report saved to disk. Use when a user provides a URL and asks to audit it, score it, check its GEO readiness, test its AI discoverability, run a landing page audit, or evaluate it for LLM citation potential. Also trigger on phrases like "audit this page", "score this URL", "check GEO for", "is this page AI-ready", "run a GEO audit", "LLM page check", "how would AI read this page", or "landing page score".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to plan, evaluate, or build a free tool for marketing purposes — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Also use when the user mentions "engineering as marketing," "free tool," "marketing tool," "calculator," "generator," "interactive tool," "lead gen tool," "build a tool for leads," "free resource," "ROI calculator," "grader tool," "audit tool," "should I build a free tool," or "tools for lead gen." Use this whenever someone wants to build something useful and give it away to attract leads or earn links. For downloadable content lead magnets (ebooks, checklists, templates), see lead-magnets.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit design token usage across a product for consistency and coverage.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create QA checklists for verifying design implementation accuracy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Identify, categorize, and prioritize accumulated design inconsistencies and structural problems across a product.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design click/first-click tests to evaluate navigation and information findability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to research, profile, or analyze competitors from their URLs. Also use when the user mentions 'competitor profile,' 'competitor research,' 'competitor analysis,' 'profile this competitor,' 'analyze competitor,' 'competitive intelligence,' 'competitor deep dive,' 'who are my competitors,' 'competitor landscape,' 'competitor dossier,' 'competitive audit,' or 'research these competitors.' Input is a list of competitor URLs. Output is structured competitor profile markdown files. For creating comparison/alternative pages from profiles, see competitors. For sales-specific battle cards, see sales-enablement.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a directory of multilingual blog content for completeness, consistency, hreflang correctness, meta-tag parity, and freshness. Builds a translation coverage matrix, flags stale translations, validates hreflang and schema, and emits a prioritized report with runnable fix commands. Use when user says "locale audit", "blog locale-audit", "check translations", "multilingual audit", "translation check", "hreflang check", "Uebersetzungen pruefen".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Conduct a comprehensive accessibility audit against WCAG guidelines with severity ratings and remediation steps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audits any SDK documentation site and produces a fully scored, downloadable HTML report. Use this skill whenever a user provides a documentation URL and asks to audit, review, analyse, score, or check the quality of SDK docs. Also trigger for phrases like "audit the SDK docs at X", "check if the docs at X are complete", "review this SDK documentation", "how good are these docs", "run an SDK audit on X", or any time a user pastes a URL alongside words like audit, review, crawl, check, analyse, quality, completeness, or gaps. ALWAYS use this skill — do not attempt the audit without following this structured crawl → analyse → cross-reference → report workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design rigorous A/B tests with hypotheses, variants, metrics, and sample size calculations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Full-site blog health assessment scanning all blog files for quality scores, orphan pages, topic cannibalization, stale content, and AI citation readiness. Spawns parallel subagents for comprehensive analysis. Produces per-post scores and a prioritized action queue. Use when user says "audit blog", "blog audit", "site audit", "blog health", "audit all posts", "check all blogs".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program," or "experiment playbook." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better, or when they want to build a systematic experimentation practice. For tracking implementation, see analytics. For page-level conversion optimization, see cro.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audits any domain's AI-readiness by using curl to directly probe robots.txt, llms.txt, and llms-full.txt, then scores each file against a structured checklist and delivers a formatted report with pass/warn/fail findings and actionable fixes. Use this skill whenever a user provides a domain or URL and wants to know if llms.txt or llms-full.txt is available, discoverable, or properly structured. Trigger on phrases like "check llms.txt for", "does this site have llms.txt", "find llms.txt", "check llms for this url", "audit llms.txt", "is llms-full.txt available", or any time a user shares a domain/docs URL and wants AI-readiness checked. Also trigger when the user wants to verify GEO/AEO readiness of a documentation site.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audits any developer documentation site across 33 checks in 7 categories and produces a scored report (out of 100) with Pass / Warn / Fail status per check. Use this skill whenever a user provides a docs URL and asks to audit it, review it, score it, check its quality, or evaluate it for AI discoverability, SEO, structure, content, or completeness. Also trigger when the user says "run a docs audit", "audit these docs", "check this documentation", "how good are the docs for X", or pastes a docs URL with any evaluative intent. Always use this skill — do not attempt a freeform docs review without following this structured workflow.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.