테스트·보안 스킬

Architect a feature with the Carmack Council before writing code. Use when explicitly asked to plan a feature, do a "council plan", "carmack plan", or invoke /council-plan. Carmack's philosophy chairs a council of domain experts — Troy Hunt (security), Martin Fowler (refactoring), Kent C. Dodds (frontend), Matteo Collina (Node.js), Brandur Leach (Postgres), Vercel Performance, Simon Willison (LLM pipeline), Karri Saarinen (UI quality), Vitaly Friedman (UX quality). Interactive feature discovery followed by parallel subagent dispatch. Produces a sequenced, attributed implementation plan with no code. Stack: Next.js App Router / React / TypeScript / tRPC / Prisma / Neon / Clerk.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Perform a rigorous Carmack Council code review. Use when explicitly asked to review code, do a "council review", "carmack review", or invoke /council-review. Carmack's philosophy chairs a council of domain experts — Troy Hunt (security), Martin Fowler (refactoring), Kent C. Dodds (frontend), Matteo Collina (Node.js), Brandur Leach (Postgres), Vercel Performance, Simon Willison (LLM pipelines), Karri Saarinen (UI quality), Vitaly Friedman (UX quality), Kent Beck (test quality). Uses parallel subagents for deep, independent review. Produces prioritised P1/P2/P3 findings. Stack: Next.js App Router / React / TypeScript / tRPC / Prisma / Neon / Clerk.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a statement of applicability already exists and the team wants its exclusions to survive the audit, and asks "review our SoA exclusions", "is this a valid justification", "can we exclude physical security if we are fully remote", "the auditor challenged our not applicable controls", "rewrite our exclusion justifications" or "we outsource it, so it does not apply, right". Tests every excluded control against scope, assets, activities, suppliers, risks and commitments, gives each a keep, rewrite, reverse or ask verdict, and writes a review table plus rewritten justifications for the owner to approve.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a certification audit is booked and the team wants to know whether the first stage will go through, and asks "are we ready for stage 1", "pre-audit readiness check", "what will the auditor read first", "documentation review before the certification audit", "mock stage 1" or "what would stop the audit". Walks the documentation set the way a certification auditor reads it, checks that documents agree with each other and with the records, and writes a list of stoppers, likely findings and polish items with an owner and a fix for each.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a company needs its information security policy set written or rebuilt, or asks "write our security policies", "draft the information security policy", "we need policies for the audit", "policy pack for a startup", "our template policies are 40 documents nobody reads" or "which policies do we actually need". Maps the policy set to the company's size and owners, drafts the top-level policy and the topic policies in testable language that reflects what the company does, flags commitments that need a decision, and prepares the approval and communication record for leadership.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a supplier has returned a security questionnaire, assurance report, certificate or trust pack and someone asks "review this vendor's answers", "is this supplier safe to use", "read their SOC report for us", "what should we ask the vendor next", "triage the vendor security assessment" or "does their certificate cover the service we buy". Checks report and certificate scope against the service in use, sorts answers into evidenced, asserted, contradicted and evasive, lists the obligations the report puts back on the customer, and writes a triage note with follow-up questions and a proposed decision for the owner.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when the implementation status column of a statement of applicability may not match reality, and the team asks "is our SoA accurate", "check the implemented column", "do we have evidence for every implemented control", "reconcile the SoA with our evidence", "pre-audit evidence check" or "the auditor found a control marked implemented with no records". Samples the records behind every control marked implemented, grades the evidence, proposes a corrected status for each row and writes a reconciliation table plus an evidence gap list with owners.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a company needs to decide how much assessment each supplier deserves, or asks "tier our vendors", "which suppliers are critical", "we have 200 vendors and cannot assess them all", "build a third-party risk tiering", "rank suppliers by risk" or "which vendors need a security review this year". Builds the complete supplier population from finance, single sign-on and contracts, scores each supplier on data, access and dependency, assigns a tier by the highest axis, sets the assessment depth and cycle per tier, and writes a tiered list with the reason for every score.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when an engineering team needs a secure development policy, or has one that does not match how code really ships, and asks "write our secure SDLC policy", "secure development policy from our CI", "document our code review and scanning for the audit", "what does our pipeline already enforce", "change management for engineers" or "secure coding policy for SOC 2 or CRA". Reads the repositories and pipeline definitions, inventories what is actually enforced (reviews, checks, scanners, deploy gates, dependency and secret controls), and writes a policy whose every "must" points to the place it is enforced, with gaps listed as decisions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a team must define what its management system covers before a certification project, or its current scope is one vague sentence, and asks "write our ISMS scope", "what should be in scope", "can we exclude the sales office", "scope for the certificate", "draw the boundary of our management system" or "the auditor says our scope is unclear". Drafts the scope statement with boundaries, interfaces, dependencies and justified exclusions, for a security, privacy or AI management system, and writes a statement file plus a boundary table of open questions.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when an internal auditor has one process or area to audit and needs a working checklist built from the company's own documents, or asks "build an internal audit checklist", "audit questions for access management", "what do I test in the supplier process", "audit plan for this area", "how many samples should I take", "internal audit of our data protection process" or "test our incident process against what the policy says". Turns each commitment in the company's policies and procedures into a test with a question, a record to inspect, a sample and a pass criterion, adds framework-specific checks through a lookup, and writes a checklist file the auditor fills in during fieldwork.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when an existing risk register needs a check before an audit, a management review or a new owner takes it over, or when someone asks "clean up our risk register", "is our risk register any good", "review the risk register before the audit", "our risks have not been updated", "find duplicate risks", "who owns these risks" or "the scores look wrong". Reads the register read-only and finds stale, duplicated, unowned, orphaned and mis-scored entries, risks missing given the company's own incidents and findings, and expired acceptances, then writes a findings file with a proposed fix per line for the owners to decide.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a risk register has treatment decisions but no plan anyone can execute, or when someone asks "write the risk treatment plan", "turn the risk register into actions", "what do we do about our high risks", "treatment plan for the auditor", "budget the security roadmap from the risks" or "our treatment plan is just a list of controls". Turns each reduce, avoid or transfer decision into dated actions with an owner, budget, dependency and the record that will prove it was done, states the expected residual score and why, and adds interim measures for risks that stay high while the work runs. Writes a CSV plan and a short notes file.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a bank, payment or e-money institution, investment firm, insurer, crypto-asset service provider or other financial entity in scope of DORA needs to know whether its ICT risk management setup holds up, or when someone asks "DORA gap analysis", "are we DORA compliant on ICT risk", "check our ICT risk management framework", "prepare for the supervisor's DORA review", "does our ISO 27001 ISMS cover DORA" or "audit our Article 6 framework". Confirms the entity type and whether the simplified regime applies, maps the entity's own documents and records against the ICT risk management articles, and writes a gap list with owners, evidence and priorities.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a company needs a written risk assessment method before it builds or rescores a register, or when the current method produces registers where everything scores 3. Triggers: "write our risk methodology", "define likelihood and impact scales", "what is our risk appetite", "risk acceptance criteria", "who can accept a risk", "our auditor says the method is not repeatable", "risk matrix for our ISMS". Drafts a short method with likelihood and impact anchors in the company's own money, hours and records, a scoring rule, an acceptance threshold with an authority ladder, reassessment triggers, and a calibration test on five sample risks.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when an incident or a serious near miss is closed and the team must learn from it, or an auditor asks for lessons learned, and someone says "run the post-mortem", "post-incident review", "lessons learned", "retro on the outage", "blameless review", "root cause of the incident" or "what do we change after this breach". Builds the timeline from records before the meeting, runs a blameless discussion, finds the contributing factors, and turns them into a few owned, dated actions linked to updates of the risk register, controls, playbooks and supplier records, then writes the review and an action tracker.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when someone wants to know where to start with the grcskills library, or asks "review my GRC setup", "what should I fix before the audit", "which compliance skills do I need", "audit my ISMS folder", "give me a 30-day compliance plan" or "rank the skills for my company". Reads the frontmatter of every skill in the library, inspects the compliance material the agent can reach (repo, policy folder, registers, platform exports), ranks the 10 skills that would help most with impact, effort and evidence for each, audits what is broken, duplicated or missing, and writes a 30-day plan to files in a grc-setup-review folder. Read-only on everything else.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a company starts a compliance programme and needs to know how far it is from a framework, and asks "run a gap analysis", "how ready are we for the audit", "baseline us against the framework", "what do we have and what is missing", "readiness assessment before we hire an auditor" or "how long until we can certify". Baselines what exists against the chosen framework from documents and records, rates each item by evidence rather than opinion, sizes every gap by effort and audit risk, and writes a gap register plus a prioritised summary with the long-lead items first.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when an internal or external audit raised a nonconformity, finding, exception or observation and the team must answer it, or asks "write the corrective action plan", "root cause for this audit finding", "respond to the major nonconformity", "CAPA for the auditor", "how do we close this finding" or "the auditor rejected our corrective action". Separates correction from corrective action, runs a root cause analysis that stops at a cause the company controls, checks for the same problem elsewhere, and drafts a response with actions, owners, dates and the evidence that will prove effectiveness at the next audit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a team needs its first information security risk register, or has one that is a copied catalogue nobody owns, and asks "build our risk register", "draft a risk assessment", "what are our top risks", "risk register from scratch", "our auditor wants a risk assessment" or "turn our incidents and findings into risks". Drafts 20 to 40 company-specific risk scenarios from the material the agent can reach, scores them against an agreed method, proposes owners and treatments, and writes a CSV register plus a notes file of assumptions and questions for owners.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a risk owner wants to accept a residual risk instead of treating it further, or when someone asks "write a risk acceptance", "we want to accept this risk", "risk exception form", "document the risk acceptance for the auditor", "security exception for this system", "can we sign off this risk" or "management accepted the risk, how do we record it". Drafts a one-page decision record per risk: the risk and its score, the options considered with cost, why acceptance is reasonable, compensating measures with evidence, conditions, expiry and the triggers that reopen it, with a signature block for the person who holds the authority.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a company must work out where each of its AI systems sits under the EU AI Act, and asks "is this high-risk", "classify our AI systems", "AI Act risk tier", "are we a provider or a deployer", "does Annex III apply to us", "is this a prohibited practice", "what does the AI Act mean for our chatbot" or "which AI Act obligations do we have". Tests each system, one at a time, for scope, role, prohibited practices, the two high-risk routes, the narrow exemption, transparency duties and general-purpose models, and writes a reasoned classification record per system plus a summary table of resulting obligations to confirm with whoever owns legal interpretation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a covered entity or business associate needs to know where protected health information lives and moves, or asks "map our PHI", "ePHI inventory", "HIPAA data flow diagram", "where does patient data go", "PHI flow map for the risk analysis", "which vendors need a BAA" or "do our logs contain PHI". Traces health data from where it enters, through systems, integrations, logs, backups and vendors, to where it leaves and is disposed of, records the safeguards that cover each flow and the business associate agreement behind each external one, and lists the gaps as input to the security risk analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this skill when a team suspects its policies describe a company that does not exist, before an audit or customer review, or asks "do our policies match what we actually do", "check the policy against reality", "paper versus practice", "will the auditor find gaps in our policies", "our policy says quarterly but we never do it" or "align policies with how we work". Turns each policy into testable statements, samples the systems and records that show the practice, classifies every gap and proposes whether to fix the policy or the practice, with owners and priorities.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.