테스트·보안 스킬

Audit every endpoint in a PostHog project for staleness, failed materialisations, and unused materialised versions. Use when the user asks "what endpoints can I clean up?", "are any of my endpoints broken?", "which materialised versions are still being called?", or wants a one-shot cleanup pass over the Endpoints product. Produces a prioritised report grouped by issue type, with recommended actions but does not modify anything without explicit confirmation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Author useful, low-noise log alerts on services in a PostHog project. Use when the user asks to set up alerts for their logs, suggest alerts they should add, or evaluate whether a service is worth monitoring. Covers service triage, baseline characterisation, threshold drafting, back-testing via simulate, and shipping with a notification destination.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Start the dev server, discover API routes from the codebase, hit every endpoint, and report which ones return errors.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit the health of a PostHog project's data warehouse — find every broken or degraded pipeline item across sources, sync schemas, materialized views, batch exports, and transformations. Use when the user asks "what's broken in my warehouse?", "give me a health check", "audit my data pipeline", "why are some dashboards stale?", or wants a one-shot triage summary before deciding where to spend time. Produces a prioritized report of issues grouped by severity and type, with recommended next steps.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

How to author, edit, and adapt PostHog Signals scouts — the scheduled agents that scan a project and emit findings into the Signals inbox. Use when a user wants to customize a canonical scout for their own setup (narrow its scope, retune its thresholds, add disqualifiers), tweak a scout's schedule or dry-run posture, or write a brand-new scout from scratch for a specific use case (a custom event, a product surface no canonical scout covers). Covers the scout SKILL.md anatomy, the emit contract, the dedupe + scratchpad-memory conventions, the per-team skills-store path vs the canonical in-repo path, and the emit-and-inspect test loop (with dry-run as an optional safety net). Trigger on "write/edit/customize a signals scout", "new scout for X", "tune my scout schedule", "make a scout that watches <event>".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze a repository to generate recommended Claude Code settings.json permissions. Use when setting up a new project, auditing existing settings, or determining which read-only bash commands to allow. Detects tech stack, build tools, and monorepo structure.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Tests associations between categorical variables in clinical data using chi-square, Fisher's exact, Boschloo, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, and modern McNemar variants with calibrated confidence intervals (Wilson, Newcombe, Miettinen-Nurminen). Use when analyzing categorical outcomes, paired binary endpoints, or testing treatment-outcome independence in confirmatory or exploratory clinical trials.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Controls error rates across thousands of simultaneous tests in genomics discovery using false-discovery-rate methods (Benjamini-Hochberg 1995; Benjamini-Yekutieli 2001 for arbitrary dependence; Storey q-value with pi0 estimation; local FDR; independent filtering Bourgon 2010; covariate-weighted FDR via IHW Ignatiadis 2016), plus family-wise error control (Bonferroni, Holm) and the GWAS genome-wide threshold. Covers the FDR-versus-FWER choice as the discovery-versus-confirmatory distinction, the dependence assumptions behind BH (PRDS) versus BY, pi0 estimation, the independent-filtering and false-coverage-rate traps, and reproducibility ranking via IDR (Li 2011). Use when correcting p-values from genome-wide tests, choosing between BH/BY/q-value/Bonferroni, setting an FDR threshold, applying IHW or independent filtering, or interpreting q-values. For confirmatory trials with few pre-specified endpoints (closed testing, graphical/gatekeeping), see clinical-biostatistics/multiplicity-graphical.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Diagnostic test / biomarker accuracy — sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, likelihood ratios, accuracy from a 2x2 table; ROC curve, AUC, and the optimal cutoff (Youden) for a continuous biomarker; and post-test probability via Bayes. Use when you have test results vs a gold standard (binary 2x2, or a continuous score + true labels) and need to judge how good the test is, pick a threshold, or compute the probability of disease given a result. Emphasizes the prevalence-dependence of PPV/NPV.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, Toxicity) profiling for drug candidates. Integrates ADMET-AI predictions, SwissADME drug-likeness, PubChemTox experimental toxicity, ChEMBL clinical data, Lipinski rule-of-five, and CYP interaction data. Use for drug-likeness assessment, BBB penetration, bioavailability, hepatotoxicity prediction, ADME/PK profiling, or screening compound libraries before lab testing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Automated LLM-driven hypothesis generation and testing on tabular datasets. Use when you want to systematically explore hypotheses about patterns in empirical data (e.g., deception detection, content analysis). Combines literature insights with data-driven hypothesis testing. For manual hypothesis formulation use hypothesis-generation; for creative ideation use scientific-brainstorming.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyzes chemical libraries by scaffold using Bemis-Murcko scaffolds, generic frameworks, cyclic skeletons, matched molecular pair (MMP) analysis via mmpdb, R-group decomposition, Free-Wilson analysis, scaffold hopping, and chemotype-aware ML train/test splits. Use when identifying chemotype clusters in a library, deriving SAR transformation rules, decomposing series into R-groups, performing scaffold-balanced QSAR splits, or planning analog campaigns.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Validates docked / generated protein-ligand poses using PoseBusters physical-validity tests, strain energy quantification, geometric checks (planarity, vdW overlap, bond/angle distortion), and pose-energy reasonableness. Filters AI-docking outputs (DiffDock, EquiBind, NeuralPLexer) where ~50% of poses fail physical-validity tests. Use when QC-ing docking results, comparing classical vs ML docking outputs, or filtering pose lists before SAR analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Make a GTK4/libadwaita app accessible — accessible labels and roles, tooltips on icon-only buttons, keyboard navigation, contrast, and testing with Orca/Accerciser. Use when fixing a11y issues or running the accessibility category of a HIG audit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Package a GNOME app as a Flatpak — manifest for the GNOME runtime, sandbox permissions, build/run/test loop, and Flathub submission checklist. Use when packaging, distributing, or preparing a GNOME app for Flathub.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit a GTK4/libadwaita app for GNOME HIG compliance across 12 categories (text, icons, layout, shortcuts, accessibility, color, dialogs, responsiveness, CSS, GSettings, i18n), then fix violations category by category. Use when asked to audit, review, polish, or "make HIG-compliant" a GNOME app, or before a release/Flathub submission.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Authoritative resource for building, auditing, and improving GNOME GTK4/libadwaita apps. Design tokens, 42-widget component library, 21 pattern skills, 47 mirrored HIG pages, 34 real-app audits, and lint scripts. Use when building a GNOME app, adding GNOME GUI features, auditing HIG compliance, packaging for Flatpak/Flathub, or when the user mentions GTK, libadwaita, Adw, Blueprint, or GNOME HIG.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Completes the online SBTI personality test at sbti.fancc.de5.net, answers all single-choice questions using the model's default personality and stable behavioral tendencies, submits the test, and returns the final type, match percentage, result description, and fifteen-dimension scores. Use when the user asks to take the SBTI test, run the SBTI quiz, get an SBTI result, or complete that personality test website for them.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use every time you push a commit to an active pull request, to verify the PR is truly stable before reporting merge readiness. Covers the post-push wait window, AI review audit (Copilot/Greptile/Codex), and the gh commands to snapshot PR state. Trigger on "I pushed" or "is the PR ready to merge".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Two-phase memory hygiene. Phase 1: scan external Claude Code memory (~/.claude/projects/<slug>/memory/) for durable rules to migrate into the repo and entries already duplicated by repo atoms. Phase 2: audit in-repo memory/, CLAUDE.md, docs/architecture/, and docs/sections/ for dead links, duplication, drift, and bloat.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Autonomous themed tech-debt cleanup. Reads docs/architecture/debt-ledger.yml, rotates to the least-recently-served debt theme, works it for a time budget (default 2h) or until drained, opens one PR, and asks judgment questions inline at the end. Use for daily debt burndown without Peter pointing at a target: grandfathered analyzer rules, architecture-test baselines, obsolete-field reads, cross-section stitching.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Three-axis orchestrator: (1) clean section boundaries — naming, routes, views, ViewModels, DB ownership, cross-section access; (2) internal cohesion — no EF in service layer, caching in service only, proper interfaces, reusable ViewComponents, architecture-test coverage; (3) focused tests — grouped under the section, covering invariants/negatives/triggers, pruned of redundancy. Push-and-bot-review loop. Use when a sizable PR landed, a section shows arch drift, or /pr-review returned a non-trivial violation list. Camps is the gold-standard reference.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Stryker-driven test cull: delete slop, consolidate redundants, fill mutation-coverage gaps. Score up, test count and lines down. Use when the user says 'trim tests', '/trim-tests', or wants to clean up LLM-generated test bloat. No args picks the worst-scored file; argument scopes to a section, service, or file.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Audit site navigation — find dead-end features, missing backlinks, and poor discoverability. Produces an improvement list, no code changes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.