AIPOCH

Transform lengthy academic papers into concise, structured 250-word abstracts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs primary, secondary, and exploratory endpoints for biomedical and clinical research protocols. Always use this skill when a user needs to translate study aims into operational endpoint definitions with event rules, assessment timing, composite logic, interpretability, and protocol-stage auditability. Focus on endpoint precision, feasibility, clinical meaning, ambiguity reduction, and implementation readiness rather than generic study design advice.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates complete tumor immune-infiltration-guided bulk-transcriptome diagnostic biomarker and machine-learning research designs from a user-provided cancer type and study direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a tumor bioinformatics study centered on differential expression, immune infiltration estimation, immune-linked module discovery, consensus feature selection, diagnostic modeling, nomogram construction, clinical association, and optional prognostic extension or validation. Covers five study patterns (immune-cell-first diagnostic workflow, immune-module-to-biomarker workflow, consensus-ML biomarker workflow, diagnostic-plus-prognostic hybrid workflow, translational validation workflow) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, reference literature pack, and self-critical risk review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs internal, external, temporal, and functional validation strategies at the protocol stage for medical research studies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates complete Mendelian Randomization + single-cell transcriptomics (scRNA-seq) research designs from a user-provided direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or build a study combining MR and single-cell data — even if phrased as "help me write a paper on X", "design a bioinformatics study for Y", or "I want to study Z using MR and scRNA". Covers five study patterns (mechanism gene-set, key-cell, candidate-gene reverse validation, exposure-disease-cell triangulation, translational biomarker) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and a strictly verified reference literature retrieval layer with real references only.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates complete programmed-cell-death (PCD) / regulated-cell-death (RCD) bulk-transcriptome oncology research designs from a user-provided disease and mechanism theme. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, plan, or structure a cancer bioinformatics study built around cell-death patterns, tumor microenvironment, prognostic modeling, immune landscape analysis, mutation profiling, and computational drug sensitivity. Covers five study patterns (mechanism-gene-set, subtype-discovery, prognostic-signature, immune-response stratification, translational drug-hypothesis) and always outputs four workload configs (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+) with recommended primary plan, step-by-step workflow, figure plan, validation strategy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and a strictly verified reference literature retrieval layer with real references only.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Compares multiple study-route options for the same biomedical research question and recommends one primary plan, while explicitly explaining why alternative routes are secondary, premature, weaker, or dependency-heavy. Always use this skill when the user already has a reasonably defined question but is unsure which main study route should anchor the project. Focus on plan comparison, route selection, dependency awareness, and primary-plan justification rather than full protocol drafting.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Generates complete process-related diagnostic biomarker bioinformatics research designs from a user-provided disease context, gene-family or pathway theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on process-related genes, DEG and WGCNA integration, machine-learning feature selection, nomogram-based diagnostic modeling, immune infiltration, regulatory-network analysis, and optional external or experimental validation. Covers five study patterns (process-DEG discovery, co-expression-module integration, machine-learning biomarker selection, diagnostic model/nomogram workflow, immune-regulatory interpretation and validation) and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Detects methodological gaps across study design, analysis, validation, bias control, reproducibility, and implementation readiness within a biomedical research area. Use this skill when a user wants to identify what current studies are still methodologically missing, which weaknesses are most consequential, and what upgrade path would produce a stronger next-step study. Always separate design gaps, analysis gaps, validation gaps, and reproducibility gaps. Never treat technical complexity as methodological rigor.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when performing time-dependent ROC curve analysis for survival data with follow-up time, event status, and a numeric marker. Supports CSV/TXT/TSV/Excel input, `risk_score` as the default marker unless `--marker_col` is provided, parameter validation, standardized output directories, AUC table export, ROC point export, and PDF figure generation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when performing sample-level dimensionality reduction and visualization on abundance or OTU-style matrices with a companion group file, generating UMAP and/or t-SNE coordinates and plots for group separation assessment. NOT for: differential expression testing, single-cell workflows requiring dedicated embeddings pipelines, or analyses without a sample grouping file.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when running prognostic survival analysis on a clinical cohort with time-to-event data to estimate univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, export result tables, and generate forest plots. NOT for: nomogram construction, calibration curves, time-dependent ROC analysis, or model training/feature selection beyond the built-in univariate screening rule.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when building XGBoost models on tabular data and returning feature importance ranking outputs. Supports binary classification and regression with automatic task detection, train-test split, performance tables, feature importance ranking tables, and PNG importance plots.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Finds translational opportunities that connect basic-research discoveries to clinically meaningful use cases such as diagnosis, stratification, prognosis, treatment response prediction, monitoring, or therapeutic development. Use this skill when a user wants to turn a mechanism finding, pathway signal, cellular phenotype, experimental observation, or omics discovery into a stronger translational research direction. Always separate mechanistic relevance from translational usability, and never present a basic finding as clinically actionable unless the evidence supports that level.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Identifies translationally meaningful paths for bioinformatics findings by mapping omics or computational discoveries to diagnosis, stratification, prognosis, treatment-response, monitoring, or target-nomination use cases, while auditing bridge evidence, assayability, and validation burden. Use this skill when a user wants to know whether a bioinformatics finding can be framed as a stronger translational topic without overclaiming clinical relevance. Always separate statistical signal from translational value, and never imply clinical utility, targetability, or validation depth without explicit evidence support.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Scans the biomarker landscape of a disease area by biomarker type, clinical/research use case, evidence layer, validation status, and maturity level. Use this skill when a user wants a field-level biomarker evidence map rather than a generic literature summary. Always separate exploratory biomarkers from externally validated or clinically embedded biomarkers, and never imply clinical maturity without explicit evidence support.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds professional search strategies for PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and similar databases. Use when a user needs to construct a MeSH-based Boolean query, design a systematic review search, expand a concept with synonyms, apply study-type or date filters, or adapt a query across multiple databases. Also triggers when the user says "help me search for papers on X", "build a search strategy", "what are the MeSH terms for", or "I need a systematic review search string".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Explains why studies on the same biomedical topic reach different or opposing conclusions by auditing differences in population, endpoint definition, sample source, assay or platform, study design, statistical model, adjustment strategy, validation chain, and bias control. It separates true contradiction from apparent contradiction caused by framing or methods. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, trial identifiers, dataset details, platform details, study features, or conflict explanations that are not supported by the input.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Organizes the evidence and competitive landscape around a drug, target, or pathway by separating disease relevance, tractability, preclinical evidence, clinical evidence, modality fit, and crowding. Always map what is biologically supported, what is druggable, what has actually advanced, and what remains strategically open. Never confuse target relevance with druggability, preclinical activity with clinical promise, or narrative excitement with validated development maturity. Never fabricate references, trial status, approval status, company activity, or asset metadata.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Ranks papers by evidence family, methodological quality tier, validation depth, and claim discipline; assigns anchor, context-setting, mechanistic support, or caution citation roles; prevents prestige-based or design-label-based ranking errors.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Reads a paper figure by figure before re-integrating the full narrative, so the user can identify the core findings quickly and check whether each visual actually supports the authors' main claims. Always separate figure content, figure-linked claim, evidentiary strength, and unsupported interpretation. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, figure content, panel labels, result values, or study details that were not actually provided.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quickly judges whether a biomedical paper is worth deep reading by screening for question fit, design quality, sample adequacy, methodological novelty, and reproducibility value.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Identifies real, evidence-audited, topic-specific research gaps in medical research by first retrieving and verifying literature from trusted sources, then mapping the current evidence landscape, rejecting pseudo-gaps, and converting only medium/high-confidence gaps into study-ready research opportunities. Always require real literature retrieval before formal gap claims. Never fabricate references, metadata, or findings.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

A medical-research-native literature reading skill for users with clinical, bioinformatics, translational, and basic experimental backgrounds. Use this skill whenever a user wants to read, analyze, critique, or interpret a medical or scientific paper — whether they provide a PDF, abstract, DOI, PMID, or just a title. Triggers include requests like \"analyze this paper\", \"critique this study\", \"is this a strong paper?\", \"give me similar studies\", \"prepare me for journal club\", \"help me understand this bioinformatics paper\", \"what are the weaknesses here?\", or \"turn this into a mind map\". Also activate for any downstream deliverables such as journal club kits, comparison tables, PI decision briefs, replication starters, or follow-up experiment designs. Do NOT treat as a generic summarizer — this skill performs structured evidence-type classification, track-specific critical appraisal, interpretation-boundary judgment, and research-grade follow-up generation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.