AIPOCH

Explains why studies on the same biomedical topic reach different or opposing conclusions by auditing differences in population, endpoint definition, sample source, assay or platform, study design, statistical model, adjustment strategy, validation chain, and bias control. It separates true contradiction from apparent contradiction caused by framing or methods. Never fabricate references, PMIDs, DOIs, trial identifiers, dataset details, platform details, study features, or conflict explanations that are not supported by the input.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Builds professional search strategies for PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and similar databases. Use when a user needs to construct a MeSH-based Boolean query, design a systematic review search, expand a concept with synonyms, apply study-type or date filters, or adapt a query across multiple databases. Also triggers when the user says "help me search for papers on X", "build a search strategy", "what are the MeSH terms for", or "I need a systematic review search string".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Scans the biomarker landscape of a disease area by biomarker type, clinical/research use case, evidence layer, validation status, and maturity level. Use this skill when a user wants a field-level biomarker evidence map rather than a generic literature summary. Always separate exploratory biomarkers from externally validated or clinically embedded biomarkers, and never imply clinical maturity without explicit evidence support.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Identifies translationally meaningful paths for bioinformatics findings by mapping omics or computational discoveries to diagnosis, stratification, prognosis, treatment-response, monitoring, or target-nomination use cases, while auditing bridge evidence, assayability, and validation burden. Use this skill when a user wants to know whether a bioinformatics finding can be framed as a stronger translational topic without overclaiming clinical relevance. Always separate statistical signal from translational value, and never imply clinical utility, targetability, or validation depth without explicit evidence support.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Finds translational opportunities that connect basic-research discoveries to clinically meaningful use cases such as diagnosis, stratification, prognosis, treatment response prediction, monitoring, or therapeutic development. Use this skill when a user wants to turn a mechanism finding, pathway signal, cellular phenotype, experimental observation, or omics discovery into a stronger translational research direction. Always separate mechanistic relevance from translational usability, and never present a basic finding as clinically actionable unless the evidence supports that level.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when building XGBoost models on tabular data and returning feature importance ranking outputs. Supports binary classification and regression with automatic task detection, train-test split, performance tables, feature importance ranking tables, and PNG importance plots.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Academic paper reading and research development system for biomedical researchers. Finds papers via Semantic Scholar, reads with structured notes, tracks discussion insights, and synthesizes literature into a Research Foundation Document (RFD) for downstream protocol design skills. 8 commands: /setup /feed /read /discuss /recap /update /sync /propose

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when running prognostic survival analysis on a clinical cohort with time-to-event data to estimate univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, export result tables, and generate forest plots. NOT for: nomogram construction, calibration curves, time-dependent ROC analysis, or model training/feature selection beyond the built-in univariate screening rule.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when performing sample-level dimensionality reduction and visualization on abundance or OTU-style matrices with a companion group file, generating UMAP and/or t-SNE coordinates and plots for group separation assessment. NOT for: differential expression testing, single-cell workflows requiring dedicated embeddings pipelines, or analyses without a sample grouping file.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when performing time-dependent ROC curve analysis for survival data with follow-up time, event status, and a numeric marker. Supports CSV/TXT/TSV/Excel input, `risk_score` as the default marker unless `--marker_col` is provided, parameter validation, standardized output directories, AUC table export, ROC point export, and PDF figure generation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when you need a standardized R CLI workflow to run two-class SVM-RFE feature ranking on an expression-like matrix, choose an informative feature count from cross-validated error, and generate reproducible ranking and error plots. NOT for regression, multi-class classification, missing-value imputation, or remote data fetching.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when generating Sankey or alluvial plots from sample annotation tables where rows are samples and selected columns are categorical stages such as risk group, response status, subtype, or cohort labels. NOT for: gene network flow analysis, continuous-value trajectories, or graph-structured pathway visualization.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when performing correlation analysis between two variables including Pearson and Spearman correlation methods. Supports command-line parameter input, automatic data format detection, parameter validation, result directory creation, and CSV or TXT format result export.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when you need a standardized R CLI workflow to build a protein-protein interaction network from a local gene list and an offline STRING cache, export node and edge tables, and render a reproducible PDF network plot. NOT for online API fetching, arbitrary graph databases, multi-omics integration, or non-STRING interaction sources.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when constructing a prognosis nomogram from survival-related clinical predictors, exporting the nomogram bundle and C-index table, and optionally rendering the final nomogram PDF. NOT for: univariate/multivariable Cox feature screening, calibration curves, ROC analysis, decision-curve analysis, or non-survival outcomes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when assessing how well a survival model's predicted probabilities agree with observed outcomes by fitting a Cox model and generating bootstrap calibration curves at one or more prediction horizons from a clinical CSV file. NOT for: nomogram construction, univariate Cox screening, ROC analysis, or decision-curve analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use this bioinformatics data analysis skill to construct a database-driven lncRNA-mRNA regulatory network from target lncRNA and/or gene lists by projecting shared miRNA evidence from local ceRNA reference tables. It does not infer networks from expression matrices.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Extracts concrete unmet clinical needs from guidelines, reviews, real-world studies, and clinical-practice evidence. Use this skill when a user wants to turn broad medical research value into specific clinical pain points such as weak early detection, poor risk stratification, treatment-response heterogeneity, monitoring gaps, diagnostic delay, undertreatment, overtreatment, or implementation failure. Always ground unmet-need claims in retrieved evidence and distinguish true care gaps from generic statements of importance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when building a weighted gene co-expression network from a bulk expression matrix and a sample group file, filtering variable genes by MAD, identifying co-expression modules with WGCNA, correlating modules with traits, and exporting module-level plots and gene tables. NOT for single-cell RNA-seq, differential expression testing, methylation analysis, or datasets that are too small for WGCNA after quality control.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when analyzing transcription factor (TF) regulatory networks using Dorothea database. Input gene list, identify regulating transcription factors, generate TF-Target network visualization. For: transcription factor enrichment analysis, gene regulatory network research.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when performing PCA principal component dimensionality reduction on tabular numeric data. Supports command-line parameter input, automatic numeric feature selection, parameter validation, result directory creation, and CSV or TXT format result export.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Clarifies a vague clinical or biomedical research idea into a structured, bounded, searchable, researchable, and testable question. Always use this skill whenever a user has an early-stage clinical or research thought, an over-broad topic, an ill-defined evidence question, or an unclear problem statement that must be translated into a question framing suitable for literature retrieval, evidence synthesis, gap analysis, study design, or downstream protocol planning. Never jump straight to answering the substantive medical question unless the user explicitly asks for that. Focus first on question framing, boundary setting, and downstream-ready formulation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when you need a standardized R CLI workflow to train a two-class random forest model from an expression-like feature matrix, rank variable importance, and generate reproducible error and importance plots. NOT for regression tasks, multi-class classification, missing-value imputation, preprocessing, or remote data fetching.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Designs complete integrated research plans for bulk transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and related omics from a user-provided biomedical direction. Always use this skill whenever a user wants to design, scope, or structure a bulk multi-omics or single-omics-plus-clinical study — including disease-focused, mechanism-focused, biomarker-focused, stratification-oriented, or translational projects. It should define the research question, choose the best-fit study pattern, recommend example datasets as reference candidates only, specify the core analysis modules and method choices, propose a validation ladder, and output four workload configurations (Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+). Never fabricate datasets, accession numbers, sample counts, metadata completeness, cohort availability, assay coverage, literature references, PMIDs, DOIs, or validation status. Always include the mandatory Dataset Disclaimer immediately before any workflow section that mentions datasets or public resources.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.