'cycles' 검색 결과

Use when internet_learner cycles all report rejected.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 (Incident Response Recommendations for Cybersecurity Risk Management). Use for CSF 2.0-aligned incident response life cycles, IR roles, Community Profile priorities for DE/RS/RC and preparation, playbooks, coordination, and continuous improvement. Covers 800-61r3 only; does not replace CSF 2.0 full text, SP 800-61r2 tactical playbooks, or sector-specific breach-notification law.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the DoD Systems Engineering Guidebook (OUSD R&E, February 2022). Use for the DoD SE process model — the 16 SE processes (8 technical management + 8 technical) mapped to ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288, the event-driven technical reviews and audits across the Major Capability Acquisition life cycle (ASR, SRR, SFR, PDR, CDR, SVR/FCA, PRR, PCA), the Systems Engineering Plan (SEP), risk/issue/opportunity management, TPMs and leading indicators, system-of-systems and digital engineering, and the 24 design considerations (RAM, system safety, HSI, system security engineering, MOSA, supportability, etc.). Acquisition-program oriented: thin on detailed cost estimating, contracting law, and non-DoD or commercial life cycles.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from NASA-STD-8729.1A — NASA's R&M (Reliability and Maintainability) standard covering spaceflight and support systems (Revision A, 2017-06-13). Use for NASA's objectives-driven R&M framework — the R&M objectives hierarchy (one Top Objective decomposed into four sub-objectives, paired with tailorable strategies), how R&M requirements are established inside the SMA Plan required by NPR 7120.5, the SMA Technical Authority concurrence/independent-evaluation governance, milestone vs. readiness review gates, the reliability/maintainability/availability vocabulary (Ai vs. Ao, the failure causal chain, risk as a triplet), and the R&M Evidentiary Methods catalogue (FMEA/FMECA, FTA, RBDA, RCM, LORA, plus the space-environment and parts-pedigree analyses). Scoped to NASA spaceflight and support systems and to assurance planning: it is an objectives-and-strategies standard, so it deliberately does NOT prescribe step-by-step analysis procedures (those live in the referenced NASA Preferred Reliability Practices) and is thin on facility R&M, detailed math/derivations, and non-NASA or commercial life cycles.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the Expanded Guidance for NASA Systems Engineering (NASA/SP-2016-6105-SUPPL, Volume 1, March 2016) — the practitioner-depth supplement to the NASA SE Handbook. Use for the load-bearing mechanics the handbook compresses: the SE Engine's per-phase cadence and the iterative-vs-recursive distinction, the AS9100 crosswalk, life-cycle tailoring vs. customization and the Compliance Matrix, the recursive system-design consistency loop (ConOps vs. Operations Concept, requirement flow/type/ownership, successive refinement), product realization (verify/qualify/accept/certify cardinality, protoflight, 'test the way we fly' coverage, two-form transition), and the crosscutting technical-management procedures (six-step scheduling, cost-estimating method selection, JCL, interface document family, RIDM/CRM, CM baselines, EVM arithmetic, MOE/MOP/KPP/TPM, the three required leading indicators, and the decision-analysis method catalog). This is the DEPTH layer — it deliberately does NOT restate the base definitions; pair it with the nasa-se-handbook pack. Scope: NASA space-flight SE practice (Vol 1 Practices); thin on the Vol 2 process-appendix detail, on non-NASA/commercial life cycles, and on software-engineering methodology.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Query and mutate Linear issues, projects, cycles, teams, workflow states, and comments via its GraphQL API. Use when the user wants to read or change Linear data programmatically — without the MCP server, and without hand-navigating the Linear UI.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implements and reviews push and local notification lifecycles across Flutter, Android, iOS, React Native and Kotlin Multiplatform. Use for FCM/APNs or Expo delivery, token rotation, notification permissions and channels, account bindings, duplicate messages and cold-start tap navigation. Git push and observability alerts are outside this skill.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

360 feedback register: reviewer, subject, review cycle, visibility, due date and score, as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for 360 reviews or peer feedback cycles.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user asks to "pick a launch date", "plan the launch window", or "set the embargo and lift time"; produces a candidate-window comparison table (conflict / tailwind / risk per window) built from industry-event cycles and the competitor launch calendar, a launch-week vs rolling-release format call, store-review buffer padding (labeled Estimated), and an embargo window definition (lift moment + timezone) submitted to the launch registry as a candidate. Not for judging the cultural moment itself — use trend-spotter; not for launch-day execution — use launch-day-conductor. 发布择时/发布窗口/竞品日历/禁运期窗口/审核缓冲

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert in LangGraph - the production-grade framework for building stateful, multi-actor AI applications. Covers graph construction, state management, cycles and branches, persistence with checkpointers, human-in-the-loop patterns, and the ReAct agent pattern.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Iteratively improve a Claude Code skill using the skill-reviewer agent until it meets quality standards. Use when improving a skill with multiple quality issues, iterating on a new skill until it meets standards, or automated fix-review cycles instead of manual editing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Manages local UI state and side effects in Flutter using the flutter_hooks package (v0.21.x) with HookWidget, useState, useEffect, useMemoized, useAnimationController, and custom hooks. Use this skill when replacing StatefulWidget boilerplate with hooks, reusing stateful UI logic across widgets, managing controller lifecycles (TextEditingController, AnimationController, ScrollController) without manual dispose, implementing countdown timers or subscriptions in widgets, mixing flutter_hooks with Riverpod via HookConsumerWidget, or any time the words 'flutter hooks', 'useEffect', 'useState', 'HookWidget', or 'flutter_hooks' appear in the request.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when you need code research over an indexed codebase with minimal context: structural graph queries (who calls X, call chains, architecture overview, dead code, cross-service HTTP routes) instead of file-by-file grep/read cycles. Also trigger to minimise token spend on repetitive code exploration.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. Use this skill when designing clean architecture for a new microservice, when refactoring a monolith to use bounded contexts, when implementing hexagonal or onion architecture patterns, or when debugging dependency cycles between application layers.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

End-to-end ABM program design and orchestration for B2B SaaS mid-market and enterprise motions. Use when building a target account list, designing account tiering criteria, planning ABM channel orchestration, coordinating BDR outreach with marketing campaigns, defining ABM measurement frameworks, or running an ABM program review. Also use when asked to "build an ABM program," "set up account-based marketing," "design a target account strategy," "plan ABM campaigns," or "measure ABM results." Designed for demand gen teams selling to Mid-Market companies with $10K-$50K+ ACV, multi-persona buying committees, and 3-6 month sales cycles.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Debug iOS apps and profile performance using LLDB, Memory Graph Debugger, and Instruments. Use when diagnosing crashes, memory leaks, retain cycles, main thread hangs, slow rendering, build failures, or when profiling CPU, memory, energy, and network usage.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Capture and inspect iOS leaks and memgraphs. Use when debugging leaked objects, retain cycles, memory growth, or before/after leak evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Expert in LangGraph - the production-grade framework for building stateful, multi-actor AI applications. Covers graph construction, state management, cycles and branches, persistence with checkpointers, human-in-the-loop patterns, and the ReAct agent pattern. Used in production at LinkedIn, Uber, and 400+ companies. This is LangChain's recommended approach for building agents. Use when: langgraph, langchain agent, stateful agent, agent graph, react agent.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

End-to-end bulk time-course analysis from an expression matrix to temporal gene modules and per-cluster pathway enrichment. Orchestrates temporal DE (limma splines or DESeq2 LRT), Mfuzz/tslearn soft clustering of expression-profile shapes, GAM trajectory fitting, per-cluster GO enrichment against a temporal-gene background, and an OPTIONAL circadian rhythm-detection branch (MetaCycle/CosinorPy) that runs only when the design covers >=2 full cycles with >=6-8 evenly spaced samples per cycle. Use when analyzing a bulk time-series expression experiment from any omics platform and deciding limma-splines vs DESeq2-LRT for temporal DE, soft vs hard clustering, whether the sampling design even licenses rhythm detection, and which background to use for enrichment. Not for single-cell pseudotime (see temporal-genomics/trajectory-modeling for the bulk-vs-pseudotime boundary) or unknown-period discovery (see temporal-genomics/periodicity-detection).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Roslyn-powered semantic query CLI for C# solutions. Use when you need to find references, callers, implementations, dependencies, members, or trace call chains in a C# codebase — replaces multi-round grep/read cycles with single precise queries.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Blender Python API リファレンス。bpy / bmesh / mathutils / gpu / bpy_extras モジュール、 bpy.data / bpy.context / bpy.ops / bpy.types / bpy.props / bpy.msgbus / bpy.path コア API。 Mesh / Modifier / Geometry Nodes / Armature / Keyframe / Driver / Shape Key / NLA、 Cycles / EEVEE / Shader Nodes / Rigid Body / Cloth / Fluid / Compositor Nodes / AOV、 headless CLI レンダリング、add-on 開発、Extensions システム、MCP Server (Model Context Protocol)。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when building or updating a rolling 13-week cashflow forecast for an Australian SME: receipts from debtor history, payments from creditors and payroll cycles, ATO obligation timing (BAS, PAYG, super), and weekly actual-vs-forecast variance.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prioritizes rare-disease variants from trio/quad WES/WGS with de novo (DeNovoGear, Triodenovo), compound-heterozygous phasing (WhatsHap), mosaic VAF tiering, phenotype-driven ranking (Exomiser, Phen2Gene, AMELIE), ClinGen gene-disease validity gating, and ACMG SF v3.2 secondary findings reporting. Use when running diagnostic exome / genome pipelines, identifying candidate Mendelian disease genes, screening for incidental findings, or auditing VUS reclassification cycles. The ACMG/AMP classification framework (PVS1 decision tree, Pejaver PP3/BP4 calibration, Tavtigian point system) is in clinical-databases/acmg-classification.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.