'quality' 검색 결과

Report content quality trends from logged evals, with regression alerts. "is our content quality improving"

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Adversarial verification of AI-generated legal content with systematic fact-checking, source validation, and quality control. Use when a user asks to verify, fact-check, red-team, validate sources, or quality-control a legal document, briefing, compliance summary, or regulatory analysis before it is distributed to clients, stakeholders, or published. Trigger phrases include "verify", "fact-check", "red team", "red-flag", "check accuracy", "validate sources", "quality control", "is this correct", and "review for errors". Produces a structured verification report with severity-categorized errors, verified sources, unsupported claim list, missing disclaimers, and an explicit distribution-readiness assessment.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Collaboration platform configuration methodology for legal matter sites. Site architecture, workflow identification, dashboard design, data quality governance, and user adoption for SharePoint, Teams, and equivalent platforms. M365 is the reference implementation — outputs are platform-agnostic enough to brief IT or build simple automations without becoming a Power Automate manual. Use when setting up a matter site, identifying workflows to automate, designing reporting dashboards, managing platform data quality, or driving user adoption. Trigger on: 'set up the matter site', 'configure SharePoint', 'build a dashboard', 'what should we automate', 'brief IT on this workflow', 'nobody is using the platform', 'data quality is poor', 'set up Teams channel', 'matter site structure', 'alerts and notifications', 'user training', 'platform governance', 'status dashboard', 'what workflows can we automate', 'matter site template'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Data quality assessment is an integral part of preparatory data analysis to ensure sound biological information retrieval. We present here the MatrixQCvis package, which provides shiny-based interactive visualization of data quality metrics at the per-sample and per-feature level. It is broadly applicable to quantitative omics data types that come in matrix-like format (features x samples). It enables the detection of low-quality samples, drifts, outliers and batch effects in data sets. Visualiz

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs quality control on single-cell RNA-seq data (.h5ad or .h5 files) using scverse best practices with MAD-based filtering and comprehensive visualizations. Use when users request QC analysis, filtering low-quality cells, assessing data quality, or following scverse/scanpy best practices for single-cell analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Type-specific validation checklists, six quality characteristics, and quality gate thresholds for documentation assessment

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quality gates - 11 commit readiness gates, build/test protocol, validation checkpoints, and quality metrics

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive data quality assessment against business rules, schema constraints, and freshness expectations. Activate when validating data pipeline outputs before production use, auditing a dataset against defined business rules, or producing a quality scorecard for a data asset.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Upload video/audio media to BytePlus VOD (Video on Demand) storage, returning the Vid and playback references; supports both local file upload (ApplyUploadInfo + TOS + CommitUploadInfo) and URL pull upload (UploadMediaByUrl); also supports AI-based comprehensive quality restoration on already-uploaded videos (removing compression artifacts, noise, scratches, improving clarity, and configuring Pro-tier color depth). Trigger keywords: upload video, upload media, upload to VOD, URL upload, pull upload, local upload, file upload, UploadMediaByUrl, ApplyUploadInfo, media ingestion, quality restoration, quality enhancement, comprehensive restoration, video denoising, denoise, compression artifact removal, color depth, bit depth, 10-bit, 12-bit, 16-bit.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when auditing content quality, E-E-A-T, publish readiness, or 内容质量/EEAT评分. Runs 80-item CORE-EEAT scoring with veto checks and fix plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Code quality: cleanup, linting, formatting, quality gates.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Provides SonarQube and SonarCloud integration patterns via the Model Context Protocol (MCP) server. Enables quality gate monitoring, issue discovery and triaging, pre-push code analysis, and rule education directly in the agent workflow. Use when the user wants to check quality gates, search for Sonar issues, analyze code snippets before committing, or understand SonarQube rules. Triggers on "sonarqube", "sonarcloud", "quality gate", "sonar issues", "analyze with sonar", "check sonar", "sonar rule", "pre-push analysis".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Defines testing quality metrics, coverage thresholds, and anti-patterns. Use when establishing test gates or validating a test suite's coverage targets.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive autonomous design quality audit across accessibility (WCAG 2.2), performance, theming, responsive/adaptive design, and anti-pattern detection. Produces a prioritized report with severity ratings and fix recommendations. Use when: 'audit design', 'check accessibility', 'a11y audit', 'design review', 'UI quality check', 'WCAG audit', 'design quality'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Think and work like an expert Air Quality Scientist. Use when a task calls for Air Quality Scientist judgment. Reasons from source emissions through transformation, transport, and dose using SMOKE/MOVES inventories, WRF-driven CTMs like CMAQ and CAMx, PMF/ME-2 apportionment, and concentration-response functions, while treating rotational PMF ambiguity, AOD-to-PM bias in humid regions, uncalibrated low-cost sensors, and untreated wildfire exceptional events as first-class failure modes.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design Health — runs 19 deterministic quality checks on HTML output. Use when the user says /reimagine-it audit, "audit this page", "check design quality", or wants to verify craft-floor compliance before shipping. Catches blank plates, missing focus rings, non-compositor motion, off-palette accents, dead motion, fabricated content. No LLM, no API key. CI-ready with --json and exit codes. Part of the reimagine-it Content-Derived Design suite.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Apply clean code principles when generating or modifying implementation code. Enforces function focus, naming clarity, complexity management, error handling, and self-documenting style. Use when the user mentions 'clean code', 'code quality', 'coding guidelines', or 'implementation quality'. Loaded automatically by the code-generating molecules (code-forge, refactor-safely, bug-fix). This skill governs the craft of writing individual code units -- not architecture (see architecture), not security posture (see secure-coding), not test structure (see test-quality), and not refactoring workflows (see refactor-safely).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Analyze escaped defects and test suite health through blameless postmortems. Covers bug pattern analysis, test suite health reviews, 5 Whys root cause analysis, process improvement cycles, and postmortem/retro meeting templates with action item tracking. Use when: "QA retro," "escaped bugs," "postmortem," "quality incident," "defect analysis," "improvement cycle." Not for: live release go/no-go decisions — use release-readiness. Not for ongoing metric dashboards — use qa-metrics. Not for reviewing existing test code quality — use ai-qa-review. Related: qa-metrics, test-reliability, test-strategy.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Define, track, and act on QA metrics: test coverage percentage, flakiness rate, defect escape rate, MTTR, test execution time trends, automation ROI, quality gates, and SLAs for test suites. Includes metric formulas, realistic targets by company stage, and the action to take when each metric goes red. Use when: "QA metrics," "test metrics," "quality KPIs," "test health," "flakiness rate," "defect escape rate." Not for: building the dashboard UI (Allure/Grafana) — use qa-dashboard; measuring coverage gaps and mutation score — use coverage-analysis. Related: qa-dashboard, coverage-analysis, ci-cd-integration, release-readiness, quality-postmortem.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when reviewing, auditing, scoring, or improving a real or synthetic MATLAB AI tutor transcript, tutoring prompt, generated lesson, exercise, feedback sequence, or skill behavior for MATLAB accuracy, active learning, assignment guardrails, feedback quality, debugging support, transfer prompts, and instructor-facing quality recommendations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Validate data quality in CSV, JSON, and database exports by checking for missing values, type mismatches, duplicates, outliers, and schema violations. Use when building ETL pipelines, auditing data imports, checking data freshness, or ensuring data contracts between teams. Trigger words: data quality, validation, null values, duplicates, schema check, data contract, ETL, pipeline, data drift.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Data pipeline specialist for ETL design, data quality, CDC patterns, and batch/stream processingUse when "data pipeline, etl, cdc, data quality, batch processing, stream processing, data transformation, data warehouse, data lake, data validation, data-engineering, etl, cdc, batch, streaming, data-quality, dbt, airflow, dagster, data-pipeline, ml-memory" mentioned.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Code review specialist for quality standards, design patterns, security review, and constructive feedbackUse when "code review, pull request, PR review, code quality, refactor, technical debt, design pattern, best practice, code-review, quality, patterns, security, refactoring, best-practices, pull-request, review, ml-memory" mentioned.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematic code cleanup and refactoring agent that identifies and fixes code quality issues without changing functionality. Focuses on: - Dead code removal - Import organization - Type improvements - Consistent patterns - File organization Use when "User asks to "clean up" code, User mentions "dead code" or "unused", User wants to "organize imports", User asks about "code quality", User wants to "refactor" without changing behavior, Code review identifies cleanup items, After major feature completion, cleanup, refactoring, code-quality, maintenance, organization" mentioned.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.