Systematic 4-phase debugging with root cause investigation. Use when fixing bugs to prevent random fixes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
1.9천건 · 관련도순
Systematic 4-phase debugging with root cause investigation. Use when fixing bugs to prevent random fixes.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when debugging the Linux kernel: kgdb and kdb, ftrace and kprobes, dynamic debug, kdump and crash analysis, or printk levels on a live or crashed target.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when choosing kernel spinlocks versus mutexes, using RCU, seqlocks, completions, or memory barriers, or debugging scheduling-while-atomic. Not for userspace atomics: use concurrency-debugging.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when writing CUDA kernels, managing the thread, block, and grid hierarchy, tiling shared memory, using streams, setting nvcc flags, or using Thrust. Not for kernel debugging: use cuda-debugging.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when debugging CUDA with cuda-gdb or Compute Sanitizer, reading GPU core dumps, using device printf, or triaging error codes 700, 701, 702, and 719. Not for performance: use cuda-profiling.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when debugging with LLDB on macOS, FreeBSD, or Linux-clang, mapping GDB commands to LLDB, Xcode or VS Code integration, LLDB Python scripting, or debugging Swift and Objective-C.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when reading TSan race reports, debugging deadlocks with GDB thread inspection, analyzing Helgrind lock-order violations, or reviewing std::atomic and happens-before usage.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Guide for writing, configuring, and debugging Claude Code hooks. Use when adding, writing, or debugging hooks — including silent failures and permission errors.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when the user is debugging a bug, tracing an error, or asking why something fails. Examples: "Why is X failing?", "Where does this error come from?", "Trace this bug"
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Systematic debugging: reproduce, isolate, hypothesize, verify — with tooling for hard bugs. Use when stuck on a bug, flaky failure, or production incident.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Comprehensive 4-phase debugging methodology for complex bugs. Use for bugs that aren't immediately obvious or have resisted quick fixes. Keywords: bug, error, fix, debug, broken, crash, fail, exception
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Browser automation, debugging, and performance analysis using Puppeteer CLI scripts. Use for automating browsers, taking screenshots, analyzing performance, monitoring network traffic, web scraping, form automation, and JavaScript debugging.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Anti-debugging detection and bypass playbook. Use when reversing protected binaries that detect debuggers via ptrace, PEB flags, timing checks, or signal/exception handlers on Linux and Windows.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
This skill provides guidance for using Chrome DevTools MCP for browser debugging and automation. Use when debugging web pages, analyzing performance, inspecting network requests, viewing console messages, or interacting with Chrome DevTools features programmatically.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Uses x64dbg to dynamically debug Windows malware: setting strategic breakpoints on APIs, stepping through unpacking and decryption, dumping memory at the right moment, and manipulating execution to reach hidden code. Activates for requests to debug malware with x64dbg, set API breakpoints, or step through unpacking in a debugger.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Observes runtime behavior of binaries via QEMU emulation, GDB debugging, and Frida hooking — syscall tracing, breakpoints, memory inspection, and function interception. Use when running, tracing, or debugging a binary, verifying hypotheses from static analysis, or watching actual syscalls, network calls, or file access; requires human approval before any execution.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Firmware development for the 40-pin "Black Pill"-format board with an STM32F401RCT6 (STM32F401RC, LQFP64, 256 KB flash, 64 KB RAM, 84 MHz) that ships with the WeAct Studio HID Bootloader (USB 0483:572A, flash 0x08000000-0x08003FFF, app at 0x08004000) — its PC13 LED, KEY button on PA0, 25 MHz HSE, USB-C on USB_OTG_FS, and the PlatformIO + STM32Cube HAL setup around them, including a USB CDC virtual COM port for printf debugging. Use when working on this board, an unbranded F401RCT6 Black Pill clone, or any STM32F401/F411 board that enumerates as "WeAct Studio HID Bootloader": project setup, platformio.ini, linking at 0x08004000, flashing through the HID bootloader or ROM DFU, the app starting behind a bootloader (VTOR, SysTick, clock hand-off), clock/PLL configuration for 84 MHz plus 48 MHz USB, printf/serial console over USB (no /dev/cu or COM port), a blink that never starts or hangs in HAL_Delay, entering or recovering the bootloader, or debugging why something on the board does not work.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Authoring and managing Agentforce agent definitions using the declarative Agent Script DSL (.agent files) and associated metadata types, including the Agent Script language for the new Agentforce Builder (hybrid-reasoning -> logic vs | prompt instructions, @actions/@subagent/@variables references, subagents). Use when creating agents in source control, writing or debugging Agent Script, debugging agent metadata, or understanding the metadata lifecycle of GenAiPlugin/GenAiPlanner/BotVersion types. Triggers: 'write or debug Agent Script', 'how do I deploy an Agentforce agent using source control', 'convert an agent topic to a subagent', 'what metadata types make up an Agentforce agent', 'agent test run command failing in CI pipeline', 'GenAiPlugin vs GenAiPlanner metadata relationship', 'Agent Script logic vs prompt instructions'. NOT for Apex-based agent actions — use agentforce/custom-agent-actions-apex. NOT for clicking the agent together in the Builder UI — use agentforce/agentforce-agent-creation.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use when designing, reviewing, or debugging Salesforce Flows from an Admin perspective. Triggers: 'flow', 'automation', 'record-triggered flow', 'screen flow', 'scheduled flow', 'flow error', 'flow interview', 'before-save vs after-save', 'flow deployed as draft', 'entry criteria', 'fault connector', 'flow-meta.xml', 'FlowDefinitionView'. NOT for Flow debug mode, Run As user, or Flow test suites — use flow/flow-debugging. NOT for building an OmniStudio OmniScript — use omnistudio/omniscript-design-patterns.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Master debugger for Python code with expertise in common errors, performance issues, and debugging tools
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Run a self-retrospective on a Skmtc-related session — generator authoring, CLI configuration, debugging, or any sustained interaction involving `@skmtc/core`, `@skmtc/cli`, or `@skmtc/gen-*` packages. Captures three distinct outputs: (1) friction entries (mistakes, surprises, overridden defaults, multi-cycle struggles), (2) a "knowledge acquired" block recording facts the agent learned during the session that weren't in its training — the primary signal for doc gaps — and (3) a closing priority list ranking the top 2-3 findings for docs/skills triage. Wins are logged only when they identify a pattern worth codifying that isn't already in a skill. Use this skill when the user asks to "retro", "skmtc retro", "log friction", "reflect on this session", "what did we learn", "run a retrospective", or after substantive Skmtc work (generator authoring, multi-step debugging, non-trivial CLI configuration) where capturing observations would help improve skills, docs, or Skmtc itself. Distinct from the `skmtc-cli` and `skmtc-generator` skills — those guide *doing* the work; this skill captures observations *about* the work. Do not invoke this skill during ordinary work; it is end-of- session (or mid-session-checkpoint) only.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
MUST USE for any real runtime debugging across ANY language or binary — crashes, silent failures, wrong responses, stuck processes, memory leaks, async misbehavior, unexplained timing, reverse engineering. Runs a hypothesis-driven loop: form ≥3 hypotheses, investigate in parallel, after 2 failed rounds spawn Oracles from orthogonal angles, confirm root cause, lock with a failing test, fix minimally, QA by actually USING the system, scrub artifacts. The actual HOW lives in `references/` — READ THEM. Triggers: 'debug this', 'why is X not working', 'hanging', 'attach a debugger', 'reverse engineer', 'pwndbg', 'gdb', 'lldb', 'node inspect', 'tsx debug', 'pdb', 'dlv', 'delve', 'rust-gdb', 'set a breakpoint', 'context window exploded', 'why is the response empty', 'attach the debugger', 'debug it', 'why is this happening', 'trace this bug', 'reproduce and fix', 'silent failure', 'HTTP 200 but empty', 'why did it stop', 'inspect the binary', 'reverse engineering', 'playwright'.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use this skill when debugging runtime behavior requires live data from the running app, temporary instrumentation, or hypothesis verification through logs. Trigger for async timeouts, stale or incorrect state updates, race conditions, event ordering bugs, intermittent failures, browser/client behavior that static inspection cannot explain, or any issue where the agent should create a local debug HTTP server, insert temporary probes, ask the user to reproduce, inspect .debug/debug.log, then remove all debug instrumentation and assets.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.