'hypothesis' 검색 결과

Structured guide for setting up A/B tests with mandatory gates for hypothesis, metrics, and execution readiness.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Scientific research engine v6.0 NEXUS — adversarial review (Reviewer 2), 32 quality gates, tree search, serendipity tracking, confounder harness, cross-session learning. Use for ANY scientific analysis, hypothesis testing, data validation, literature review, or task where correctness > speed.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Scientific research engine for hypothesis testing, literature gap analysis, experimental validation, and data-driven discovery. Enforces adversarial review (Reviewer 2), 32 quality gates, tree search over hypotheses, confounder harness for quantitative claims, and serendipity detection. TRIGGER when: user asks to analyze scientific data, test hypotheses, validate findings, search for research gaps, design experiments, or investigate results. DO NOT TRIGGER when: pure code review, documentation writing, devops tasks, general conversation, or non-scientific data transformation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Scope, preregister, execute, audit, normalize, and publish GEODE evaluations with research-question, reproduction, attempt-lineage, trajectory, verifier-receipt, and immutable artifact contracts. Use for benchmark runs or comparisons, eval-artifact and cache-accounting audits, GPT or subscription result normalization, research question or hypothesis framing, retry diagnosis, trajectory publication, DPO or reward-data readiness reviews, and requests involving MCPMark, tau2, BFCL, Agent-World, HAL, Terminal-Bench, or Toolathlon.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Mandatory 3-phase explore-reason-act workflow before code modification. Enforces read-before-write, root cause hypothesis formulation, minimal change application. Triggered by "explore" ("탐색"), "reason" ("추론"), "read before write", "root cause" ("근본 원인") keywords.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Performs differential expression on bulk RNA-seq count data with edgeR's negative-binomial GLM and quasi-likelihood F-test framework. Covers DGEList construction, filterByExpr, TMM/TMMwsp normalization, robust dispersion estimation, glmQLFit/glmQLFTest, TREAT for magnitude-bounded hypotheses, contrasts via no-intercept designs, voom and voomWithQualityWeights for heterogeneous samples, and the edgeR v4 bias-corrected APL changes. Use when running bulk DE with edgeR, choosing edgeR over DESeq2 (small n, transcript DE via catchSalmon, large samples), needing TREAT for a fold-change-threshold hypothesis, troubleshooting v3-to-v4 reproducibility, building paired or interaction designs, or handling library-quality heterogeneity.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structured step-by-step reasoning before acting, to avoid guessing. For complex debugging, multi-step analysis, hypothesis checks. NOT for being stuck on approach (mk:problem-solving).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a problem requires structured step-by-step reasoning before acting. Prevents jumping to conclusions or guessing root causes without evidence. Triggers on complex debugging, multi-step analysis, hypothesis verification, or when mk:fix invokes diagnosis phase. NOT for being stuck on approach (too many implementations, forced assumptions, innovation block) — use mk:problem-solving instead.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Safely develop, verify, and document proof-of-concept exploits and payloads for authorized targets inside isolated Workspace Containers. Use when a Hypothesis is well-founded, target authorization covers scope, and each active step will carry a durable approval — for minimal PoCs, impact verification, or reproducible exploit Evidence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan vulnerability research using conventional bug-hunting and pentest stage names, specialty playbooks, and a research-hypothesis-experiment loop. Use when designing a bug bounty workflow, selecting tools and strategies, building a decision tree, or turning a target/scope into a staged hunting plan.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn a specific vulnerability, patch, CVE, Version Diff, or Changelog Claim into a proactive security exploration plan. Use when the user wants research angles, lateral target discovery, patch/CVE strategy, new surface discovery, or hypothesis generation from vulnerability intelligence.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Disciplined diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Reproduce → minimise → hypothesise → instrument → fix → regression-test. Use when user says "diagnose this" / "debug this", reports a bug, says something is broken/throwing/failing, or describes a performance regression.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a bug has multiple plausible causes across layers — competing hypotheses, validation loops, evidence-based conclusions — even when the user just says 'why is this happening?'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When running discovery interviews — question-bank build, bias audit, insight extraction. Triggers on 'audit my guide', 'extract insights from transcript', 'is my hypothesis falsifiable'.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Test, fold or refute hypotheses beside the knowledge record, and reconcile records across branches. Use when open or check say hypotheses wait or an id is CONTESTED, when a write was refused into a hypothesis, before merging a branch whose record changed, and when a pull request's dry run or remeasure is red. Covers consolidate --dry-run, the fold, --refute, --from, same and distinct at the fold, and remeasure.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Plan, write, and maintain automated tests in any language, with worked examples in Python and JavaScript/TypeScript. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write or plan tests, apply TDD (red-green-refactor), structure unit tests with arrange-act-assert and given-when-then naming, choose between fakes, stubs, and mocks, set up dependency injection for testability, build integration tests with testcontainers, database seeding, or transaction rollback, write Playwright or Cypress end-to-end tests, use property-based testing with Hypothesis or fast-check, create pytest fixtures or factory_boy factories, review coverage or mutation testing, or triage flaky tests in CI. Also trigger for "test pyramid", "test trophy", "test isolation", "mocking", "snapshot tests", "golden files", "parametrized tests", "make the tests pass".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away. Scales rigor to the task, runs a hypothesis loop, and logs decisions via show-me-your-work. Use for /figure-it-out, 'figure it out', a large migration, or when no narrower playbook applies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statis...

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which...

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive Lean Six Sigma consulting skill supporting all belt levels (White Belt to Master Black Belt). Use this skill for DMAIC/DMADV project execution, Lean waste elimination (VSM, 8 Wastes/DOWNTIME, 5S), statistical analysis (process capability Cp/Cpk, control charts, hypothesis testing), and Six Sigma training/education. Triggers include "improve process", "reduce defects", "sigma level", "DMAIC project", "value stream mapping", "Kaizen", "process capability", "control chart", "root cause analysis", "5 Whys", "Fishbone diagram", "FMEA", "DOE", or requests involving process improvement methodologies.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Knowledge base from the NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods (NIST HB 151) — the practical statistics reference for engineering, metrology, and quality. Use for: exploratory data analysis and the four univariate assumptions (4-plot); measurement process characterization including bias/precision, calibration designs, gauge R&R, and ISO/GUM uncertainty budgets; production process characterization (stability vs. capability); process modeling and regression (LS/WLS/NLS/LOESS); design of experiments (screening, fractional/factorial, response-surface, Taguchi); statistical process control (Shewhart/CUSUM/EWMA charts, capability indices, acceptance sampling); product/process comparisons (hypothesis tests and confidence intervals for 1/2/3+ groups, ANOVA, multiple comparisons); and reliability (lifetime & repair-rate models, accelerated testing, reliability growth). Scope limits: this is applied frequentist statistics for measurement and quality — it does NOT reproduce the per-distribution formula galleries, worked case studies, datasets, plot images, or Dataplot/R code of the original web Handbook (those are described, not copied); it is thin on modern machine learning, Bayesian methods beyond conjugate reliability priors, time-series/forecasting, and Bayesian experimental design.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.