'quality' 검색 결과

Use when work produces a deliverable, factual claim, dataset, code change, decision, publication, deployment, automation, or irreversible action whose failure would matter; when the user asks for a quality gate, acceptance criteria, QA, completeness, validation, audit, evidence, preflight, release readiness, or a definition of done; or before claiming completion on medium- or high-risk work. Automatically decide whether a formal gate is warranted, derive task-specific pass/fail criteria, gather evidence, and block unsupported completion. Make sure to use this skill even when the user does not say "quality gate" if consequential work needs acceptance criteria or completion evidence. Skip formal gating for trivial, reversible, low-impact requests.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Runs a multi-phase quality audit of a codebase: derives behavioral requirements from code and docs, generates spec-traced tests, runs a three-pass code review and independent spec audits, and reconciles every bug with regression tests. Use for a deep quality assessment of a project, not a quick PR review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Enforce output quality, evidence verification, and quality gates across security audits. Use this skill when you perform SAST, SCA, threat modeling, or security code reviews. Use this skill to verify code locations and taint traces for all findings. Use this skill to prevent the suppression of valid security findings. Use this skill to evaluate reports against quality thresholds (score ≥ 8/10) before delivery.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Namespace router → quality and complexity skills. Use to pick the quality-check intent before invoking the matched concrete skill directly.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Produce a coverage & quality profile of a Narrative dataset (or access rule): row count, per-column null/fill rate, cardinality, ranges, top-values, inferred column shape, and quality flags. Reads bundled stats + sample first, recovers missing/stale stats by configuring and recalculating them, and escalates to a cheap `/write-nql` query only for a measure no stat can provide. Descriptive, not prescriptive. Use when: "profile dataset N", "what does dataset N look like", "coverage and quality of <dataset>", "what id types does N emit", "null rates / cardinality for <dataset>", "is this dataset's stats fresh". (narrative-common)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Codified expertise for quality control, non-conformance investigation, root cause analysis, corrective action, and supplier quality management in regulated manufacturing.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Implement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts. Use when building data quality pipelines, implementing validation rules, or establishing data contracts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when working with Codacy — codacy code quality management. Covers automated code reviews, pattern configuration, coverage tracking, security analysis, and repository settings. Use when managing Codacy projects, reviewing code patterns, configuring quality gates, or tracking code quality trends.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when working with Great Expectations — great Expectations data quality framework analysis. Covers expectation suite management, validation result review, data docs generation, checkpoint execution, datasource configuration, and batch analysis. Use when reviewing data quality results, managing expectation suites, investigating validation failures, or auditing data quality configurations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

SonarQube code quality and security analysis. Use when working with code quality metrics, security hotspots, quality gates, or issue tracking in SonarQube Cloud or Server.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Data Quality Specialist IA — Expert en qualité des données (profiling, cleaning, déduplication, validation de schéma, Great Expectations)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Facilitates conversational discovery to create Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) for non-functional requirements using the ISO/IEC 25010:2023 quality model. Use when the user wants to document quality attributes, NFR decisions, security/performance/scalability architecture, or design systems with measurable quality criteria. This should trigger for requests such as Create ADR for Non-functional requirements; Document Non-functional requirements; Capture Non-functional requirements; Generate Non-functional requirements in an ADR. Part of cursor-rules-java project

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

GPU-accelerated data curation for LLM training. Supports text/image/video/audio. Features fuzzy deduplication (16× faster), quality filtering (30+ heuristics), semantic deduplication, PII redaction, NSFW detection. Scales across GPUs with RAPIDS. Use for preparing high-quality training datasets, cleaning web data, or deduplicating large corpora.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive toolkit for preparing ISO 13485 certification documentation for medical device Quality Management Systems. Use when users need help with ISO 13485 QMS documentation, including (1) conducting gap analysis of existing documentation, (2) creating Quality Manuals, (3) developing required procedures and work instructions, (4) preparing Medical Device Files, (5) understanding ISO 13485 requirements, or (6) identifying missing documentation for medical device certification. Also use when users mention medical device regulations, QMS certification, FDA QMSR, EU MDR, or need help with quality system documentation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quality gates determinísticos para aplicações e serviços Node.js, JavaScript e TypeScript. Use quando o usuário pedir "quality gate Node.js", ESLint ou tsc em Node.js, testes, cobertura, complexidade, SAST, SCA, build ou baseline para Node.js.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Estratégia de quality gates determinísticos e adoção incremental para CI/CD. Use quando o usuário pedir "quality gate", "gate de qualidade", "política de bloqueio", "baseline", "ratchet", "qualidade no CI" ou "SonarQube".

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Quality gates determinísticos para Vue.js, JavaScript e TypeScript. Use quando o usuário pedir "quality gate Vue.js", ESLint, vue-tsc ou Vitest em projeto Vue.js, cobertura, complexidade, bundle, acessibilidade ou baseline para Vue.js.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Systematically review pull requests, feature implementations, and code changes to ensure quality, maintainability, security, and adherence to best practices. Use when reviewing code before merging, conducting peer reviews, performing self-reviews, auditing code quality, checking for security vulnerabilities, ensuring consistent coding standards, verifying test coverage, assessing performance implications, evaluating architectural decisions, or providing constructive feedback to improve team code quality.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Code quality dashboard. Wraps existing project tools (type checker, linter, test runner, dead code detector, shell linter), computes a weighted composite 0-10 score, and tracks trends over time. Use when: "health check", "code quality", "how healthy is the codebase", "run all checks", "quality score". (gstack)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Design structured evaluation rubrics for scoring LLM and agent outputs — defining quality dimensions, scoring scales, hard gates, score descriptions, and edge cases. Load when the user asks to create an eval rubric, define evaluation criteria, design scoring dimensions, write an eval spec, or says "what should I evaluate", "design a rubric", "create eval criteria", "define quality dimensions", "evaluation rubric for", "how do I measure quality of". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Prepare high-quality datasets for LLM fine-tuning with filtering, deduplication, augmentation, and RLHF data formatting. Activate on: fine-tuning data, training data curation, RLHF dataset, data quality filtering, SFT dataset. NOT for: model training infrastructure (ai-engineer), prompt engineering without fine-tuning (prompt-engineer).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Validates agent outputs against schemas and quality criteria, scores confidence, detects hallucinations, monitors convergence, decides when to iterate, and synthesizes actionable feedback. Use when checking if a node's output is acceptable, scoring confidence, detecting fabricated content, deciding whether to re-execute, or generating improvement feedback. Activate on "validate output", "check quality", "confidence score", "hallucination check", "should we iterate", "improvement feedback". NOT for executing DAGs (use dag-runtime), planning DAGs (use dag-planner), or matching skills (use dag-skills-matcher).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Validates agent outputs against expected schemas and quality criteria. Reports structural and content checks within the declared evidence scope. Activate on 'validate output', 'output validation', 'schema validation', 'check output', 'output quality'. NOT for confidence scoring (use dag-confidence-scorer) or hallucination detection (use dag-hallucination-detector).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.