3.3천건 · 관련도순
Frame multi-agent designs through explicit environment, autonomy, information, coordination, commitment, incentive, and verification assumptions. NOT for endorsing multi-agent architecture without need or claiming runtime correctness from conceptual methods.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Declare an agentic application's interaction disclosure, state, context, capabilities, and effect-control boundaries. Use for a reviewable design specification and static consistency audit before implementation. NOT for proving that controls are deployed or enforced, exposing private chain-of-thought, selecting a model/router, or designing a multi-agent protocol.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design or review a declared control-command profile and its verb/backend lifecycle matrix. Distinguish policy denial, unsupported capability, delivery acknowledgement, independently observed effect, and unknown outcome; bind authorization to principal, target, scope, current policy, expiry, and fencing epoch. NOT for claiming runtime correctness, proving an adapter from declarations, or approving a control-panel button without independent runtime evidence.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Discipline an AI agent needs to work an issue/task tracker (Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues) as the shared source of truth: pull the right next item instead of inventing work, search before creating to avoid duplicates, write actionable items with checkable acceptance criteria, keep status transitions honest, and link work to items via branches/PRs/commits so progress is legible. Use when an agent picks up tracker work, files a new issue, updates status, or closes an item. NOT for authoring the PR itself (use agent-pr-authoring), roadmap-level planning and prioritization (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), or the mechanics of multiple agents coordinating on the same codebase (use multi-agent-coordination).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build production-ready LLM applications, advanced RAG systems, and intelligent agents. Implements vector search, multimodal AI, agent orchestration, and enterprise AI integrations. Use PROACTIVELY for LLM features, chatbots, AI agents, or AI-powered applications.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs and audits closed, ordered, replay-safe message protocols between already admitted agent bodies. Use when a multi-agent exchange needs explicit epochs, audiences, per-sender sequencing, gathers, terminal fences, acknowledgements, and deterministic replay. NOT for selecting or spawning agents, granting identity or authority, choosing a runtime topology, general human facilitation, wire transport implementation, or deciding whether evidence is true.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Extend and modify the admin dashboard, developer portal, and operations console. Use when adding new admin tabs, metrics, monitoring features, or internal tools. Activates for dashboard development, analytics, user management, and internal tooling.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert in 2000s-era music visualization (Milkdrop, AVS, Geiss) and modern WebGL implementations. Specializes in Butterchurn integration, Web Audio API AnalyserNode FFT data, GLSL shaders for audio-reactive visuals, and psychedelic generative art. Activate on "Milkdrop", "music visualization", "WebGL visualizer", "Butterchurn", "audio reactive", "FFT visualization", "spectrum analyzer". NOT for simple bar charts/waveforms (use basic canvas), video editing, or non-audio visuals.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs and audits deterministic, authority-filtered partitions of trust-typed context for already admitted bodies or abstract continuation slots. Use when causal context, obligations, disclosure boundaries, vector-space identity, capacity, and omission proofs must survive partitioning. NOT for spawning or admitting agents, choosing worker count, retrieving arbitrary knowledge, writing successor prompts, or granting tools, leases, identity, or effect authority.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design and scaffold new skills, subagents, and MCP surfaces. Use when choosing which primitive to create. NOT for invoking existing agents, generic coding help, or deployment work.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Expert-level idiomatic Rust API design — the patterns that make illegal states unrepresentable and abstractions zero-cost. Type-state programming (PhantomData state machines), newtype + sealed + extension traits, typestate builders, RAII guards & Drop ordering, the interior-mutability decision tree (Cell/RefCell/Mutex/RwLock/Atomic/OnceLock), enum-driven state machines, error architecture (thiserror vs anyhow), dyn vs generic dispatch & object safety, the impl Trait / GAT / RPITIT toolbox, and Deref-for-smart-pointers (and its abuse). Use when designing a Rust library's public API, encoding invariants in the type system, choosing a dispatch or error strategy, or reviewing Rust for idiom. NOT for borrow-checker firefighting / toolchain / test-runner workflow (use rust-development-workflow), NOT for pd-console GPUI rendering/layout/panes (use gpui-rust-console), NOT for app packaging/notarization (use rust-app-distribution).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Designs digital experiences for ADHD brains using neuroscience research and UX principles. Expert in reducing cognitive load, time blindness solutions, dopamine-driven engagement, and compassionate design patterns. Activate on 'ADHD design', 'cognitive load', 'accessibility', 'neurodivergent UX', 'time blindness', 'dopamine-driven', 'executive function'. NOT for general accessibility (WCAG only), neurotypical UX design, or simple UI styling without ADHD context.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design scheduling agents. Use for timezone-safe negotiation, focus protection, and privacy-safe free-busy handling. NOT for calendar UI, project planning, or general agent architecture.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Time-blind friendly planning, executive function support, and daily structure for ADHD brains. Specializes in realistic time estimation, dopamine-aware task design, and building systems that actually work for neurodivergent minds.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apply cognitive task analysis to expert work that depends on perceptual cues, branching judgment, and recurring monitoring loops. Use when decomposing expert capability into agent structure, simulation design, or validation interviews. NOT for ordinary step-by-step SOP capture or simple pipelines with no tacit cue layer.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Design low-friction UX, interaction patterns, and comeback loops for AI coding assistant apps, agent consoles, background coding agents, and Port Daddy swarm/operator surfaces. Use when creating flows like prompt-to-diff, context attach, plan/apply/review, checkpoint rollback, background-agent dashboards, visual proof, or multi-agent invocation. NOT for generic landing pages, static dashboards, or implementation-only changes without product flow.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Build stateful Agents on Cloudflare Workers with current, source-verified SDK APIs. Covers durable state, RPC, chat, schedules, queues, fibers, Workflows, MCP, and channels while keeping authorization and external effects application-owned. NOT for assuming SDK helpers grant application authorization or effect approval.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Apache Airflow DAGs, operators, SLA monitoring, and workflow orchestration. Activate on: Airflow, DAG, operator, sensor, scheduler, task dependency, SLA, backfill, XCom. NOT for: dbt transformations (use dbt-analytics-engineer), streaming pipelines (use streaming-pipeline-architect).
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Construct a finite oriented simplicial or cellular cochain model and compute its stated linear invariants when coefficient spaces, maps, metrics, and observations are explicit. Use for scoped Hodge, rank, or residual calculations; not for attributing agent intent or authorizing effects. NOT for attributing intent, identifying a liar, or authorizing external effects.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Temporal interval algebra for reasoning about time relationships in planning and knowledge representation
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.
Foundational concurrent computation model where actors communicate exclusively through asynchronous message passing
한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.