'brainstorm' 검색 결과

Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Marc Andreessen-mode decision and productivity skill. A blunt, market-first operator that pressure-tests ideas, ventures, features, and career bets through Andreessen's actual frameworks — market dominates team and product; the only milestone that matters is product/market fit; bias to build over deliberate. Use when the user says 'andreessen', 'pmarca mode', 'should I build this', 'is there a market', 'are we at product/market fit', 'pmf check', 'pressure-test this idea', 'be brutal about this venture', 'market-first take', or wants a no-disclaimers, no-hedging, confidence-leveled verdict on whether something is worth pursuing. Also provides the 3x5-card + Anti-Todo personal productivity routine. Runs on a fixed anti-sycophancy operating prompt: leads with the strongest counterargument, never validates premises, uses explicit confidence levels, never apologizes for disagreeing. Not for polite brainstorming — this skill exists to tell you the market is dead when it is.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Transform rough ideas into solid designs through structured questioning

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

# 🧠 Skill Router (Skill Orchestrator)

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when a user wants a standalone browser-based visual companion for interactive mockups, diagrams, wireframes, layout comparisons, visual brainstorming, or clickable visual option selection. Starts a local zero-dependency Node server, writes HTML screens, and reads browser click events.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Standalone browser-based visual companion for interactive mockups, diagrams, wireframes, layout comparisons, visual brainstorming, and clickable visual option selection.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use when the user says "plan a feature", "brainstorm", "explore this idea", or wants to go from idea to structured plan and roadmap.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Build AI-powered software with TypeSafe: small units of AI intelligence you can use like programming primitives. Its System One models, including Jev, turn natural language and application state into typed judgments and probabilities that code can combine. Use when a feature needs programmable common sense, when brainstorming what AI could make possible in an app, or when an LLM prompt-and-parse step could become a structured decision. Applications include routing, ranking, extraction, verification, and interactive experiences; these are starting points, not the limits. Read live docs and cookbooks to find useful patterns and discover new combinations.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Turn an idea into a Conventional Docs Decision, then a Plan: classify the request, explore options and risks through dialogue, then commit a numbered Decision that review, prototypes, and acceptance move through. Use PROACTIVELY before any creative work — new features, new subsystems, interface or dependency changes, or any open-ended design question ("what are the options", "how should I approach", "should I use X or Y", "help me decide", "write a decision", "ADR").

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

[Content] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for product/feature ideation with ranked opportunities and validation tests. --mode={roadmap|scope}.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Você DEVE usar isto antes de qualquer trabalho criativo - criar features, construir componentes, adicionar funcionalidade ou modificar comportamento. Explora a intenção do usuário, requisitos e design antes da implementação.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Modos operacionais de IA (brainstorm, implement, debug, review, teach, ship, orchestrate). Use para adaptar o comportamento com base no tipo de tarefa.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

跟用户对话讨论选题——**默认一次一个**，用户主动给主题或经历，AI 围绕用户的输入深挖、提炼角度、写一份 draft。不是 AI 拿三个开放问题追用户，也不是一次给 5 个候选。触发词："找选题"/"我想做一条 X"/"最近有个想法"/"seed"/"启动种子"。可选 batch 模式：`/cheat-seed --batch 5` 走旧的 brainstorm 5 候选 + 写 5 draft 流程。

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

GStack office-hours method for early product ideas, startup demand checks, builder-mode brainstorming, narrow wedge selection, and pre-architecture clarification before plan review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Bootstraps and runs a multi-agent development team with roles (dev, QA, DevOps), parallel work, and sprint plans that survive context resets. Use when kicking off a project with parallel AI agents, writing brainstorm prompts that produce real debate, planning sprints across chats, or recovering from context overflow mid-sprint.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Routes requests to the BMad Method (v6.12.4) agile framework: persona agents, planning skills (brief, PRFAQ, PRD, UX, spec, architecture, epics, sprint planning), shipping skills (build, code review, walkthrough, QA tests, retrospective), and core helpers (brainstorming, research, review, party mode). Use when the user mentions BMad or BMM, names a BMad agent such as Mary, John, Sally, Winston, or Amelia, or wants a structured flow from idea through PRD and architecture to built, reviewed code.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Pre-PRD Research methodology combining Business Analysis, Creative Problem-Solving, Brainstorming, and Innovation Strategy. Use before writing any PRD for problem validation, market research, competitive analysis, stakeholder interviews, ideation, root cause analysis.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Use for "design X", "let's design", "brainstorm X" or "I want to build X"; a dialogue that produces ADR artifacts.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Structured problem solving in 6 steps: Problem definition, goals, brainstorming, evaluation, implementation, and review.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Meta-skill: Structured thinking as a 3-phase workflow. Combines analysis (think), ideation (brainstorm), and decision-making (decide) into one continuous process.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Ideenschürf-Workflow für festgefahrene, schwere Probleme (Beweise, Forschungsfragen, hartnäckige Design-/Architekturprobleme): einen Ideenspeicher über acht Schürftechniken füllen (Wiedererkennung, Fern-Disziplin-Analogie, Alltags-Allegorie, Störgefühl/Ästhetik, Märchen-Reframing, Web-/Literatur-Recherche, Geschwisterprojekte, Bestandsquerlauf), dann gegen bereits Versuchtes filtern, eine Idee wählen und bis zur Substanz verfolgen. Nutze diesen Skill, wenn ein Problem trotz mehrerer Anläufe feststeckt, wenn „neue Ideen für X" gebraucht werden, bei „wir drehen uns im Kreis", oder für periodische Innovations-Läufe über ein Projekt. Für breites, freies Ideensammeln ohne festgefahrenes Problem stattdessen brainstorm (SCAMPER, Six Hats etc.).

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.

Strukturiertes Problemlösen in 6 Schritten nach D'Zurilla und Goldfried: Problemdefinition, Ziele, Brainstorming, Bewertung, Umsetzung und Rückblick.

한국어 요약은 준비 중입니다. 원문 설명을 표시하고 있습니다.